Analysis of T cell subsets in lichen planus- a perception to pathogenesis

  • Dr. R. Shubha Sangeetha Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. B R Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Dr. Anamika Singh Thakur Postgraduate student, Department of Pathology, Dr. B R Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
  • Dr. Y.A. Manjunatha Professor & Head of Department, Department of Pathology, Dr. B R Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
Keywords: Lichen Planus (LP), Immunohistochemistry, T Cell Subsets, CD4 T Cell, CD8 T Cell, D-E Junction (Dermo- Epidermal junction)

Abstract

Introduction: Lichen planus (LP) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis, histopathologically characterized by band like lymphohistiocytic infiltrate obscuring the dermo-epidermal interface and associated with basal cell vacuolar degeneration. Cell mediated cytotoxicity as evidenced by dermal T lymphocytes have been postulated to initiate or stimulate the pathogenic mechanisms for Lichenoid dermatitis.

Aims and Objective: The aim of the study is 1) To determine the T cell subsets in the inflammatory population. 2) To analyze the pattern of distribution of T cells subsets in histopathologically diagnosed cases of LP. Materials and Method: Biopsies received from Dermatology department of Dr B R Ambedkar Medical College and histopathologically diagnosed as LP were subjected for immunohistochemistry for CD4 and CD8.Manual quantification and distribution of T cell subsets were analyzed by 2 individual observers.

Result: Forty cases of LP diagnosed histopathologically were subjected for immunohistochemistry for CD4 and CD8. The mean age of the patients were 35.74 years with slight female predominance (F:M ratio 1.5:1). A mixed CD4 and CD8 phenotypes were identified in inflammatory population. At the dermo-epidermal junction the mean CD8+ T cells subset was 67.5± 9.92 % and mean CD4+ T cells was 32.5±9.92 %. Perivascular quantification revealed a mean CD4+ T cells of 55±10.82 %and mean CD8+ T cells of 45±10.82%.

Conclusion: In LP cases as CD8+ cytotoxic T cells density was more in D-E Junction compared to CD4+ T helper cells, a pathogenetic role of CD8+ T cells can be highlighted in basement membrane damage. An increase in perivascular CD 4+ T cells concentration signifies the pathogenetic role of dual T cell subsets in LP. This study would perhaps give a better insight to dermatologist to improvise the treatment response.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. McKee P, Calonje E, Brenn T, Lazar A. McKee's pathology of the skin. Edinburgh: Elsevier Saunders; 2012.

2. Feldman SR, Sangueza OP, Pichardo-Geisinger R, Kinney M, Feneran A, Narahari S. Dermatopathology Primer of Inflammatory Diseases. CRC Press; 2013 Dec 3.

3. Billings S, Cotton J. Inflammatory Dermatopathology A Pathologist’s Survival Guide 2nd ed. Switzerland: Cleveland Springer;2016.

4. De Panfilis G, Manara G, Sansoni P, Allegra F. T-cell infiltrate in lichen planus. Demonstration of activated lymphocytes using monoclonal antibodies. J Cutan Pathol. 1983;10(1):52-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.1983.tb00315.x.

5. Sehgal VN, Srivastava G, Sharma S, Sehgal S, Verma P. Lichenoid tissue reaction/interface dermatitis: recognition, classification, etiology, and clinicopathological overtones. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(4):418-429; quiz 430. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.82389.

6. Mobini N, Toussaint S, Kamino H. Histopathology of Skin, 10th ed Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health /Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Publication; 2009.

7. Iijima W, Ohtani H, Nakayama T, Sugawara Y, Sato E, Nagura H, et al. Infiltrating CD8+ T cells in oral lichen planus predominantly express CCR5 and CXCR3 and carry respective chemokine ligands RANTES/CCL5 and IP-10/CXCL10 in their cytolytic granules: a potential self-recruiting mechanism. Am J Pathol. 2003;163(1):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63649-8.

8. Shimizu M, Higaki Y, Higaki M, Kawashima M. The role of granzyme B-expressing CD8-positive T cells in apoptosis of keratinocytes in lichen planus. Arch Dermatol Res. 1997;289(9):527-532. doi: 10.1007/s004030050234.

9. Kyriakis KP, Terzoudi S, Palamaras I, Michailides C, Emmanuelidis S, Pagana G. Sex and age distribution of patients with lichen planus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006;20(5):625-626. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01513.x

10. Parihar A, Sharma S, Bhattacharya S, Singh U. A clinicopathological study of cutaneous lichen planus. J Dermatol & Dermatol Surg. 2015;19(1):21-26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssdds.2013.12.003.

11. Bos JD, Zonneveld I, Das PK, Krieg SR, van der Loos CM, Kapsenberg ML. The skin immune system (SIS): distribution and immunophenotype of lymphocyte subpopulations in normal human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88(5):569-573. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12470172.

12. Rana S, Gupta R, Singh S, Mohanty S, Gupta K, Kudesia M. Localization of T-cell subsets in cutaneous lichen planus: An insight into pathogenetic mechanism. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2010;76(6):707-709. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.72452.

13. Tirumalae R, Panjwani PK. Origin Use of CD4, CD8, and CD1a Immunostains in Distinguishing Mycosis Fungoides from its Inflammatory Mimics: A Pilot Study. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(6):424-427. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.103060.

14. Florell SR, Cessna M, Lundell RB, Boucher KM, Bowen GM, Harris RM, et al. Usefulness (or lack thereof) of immunophenotyping in atypical cutaneous T-cell infiltrates. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(5):727-736. doi: 10.1309/3JK2-H6Y9-88NU-AY37.
CITATION
DOI: 10.17511/jopm.2019.i11.10
Published: 2019-11-30
How to Cite
Sangeetha, R. S., Singh Thakur, A., & Manjunatha, Y. (2019). Analysis of T cell subsets in lichen planus- a perception to pathogenesis. Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, 5(11), 892-898. https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2019.i11.10
Section
Original Article