Histopathological features of subcutaneous mycosis: a retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Subcutaneous fungal infection is commonly seen in tropical and subtropical countries particularly in India. The lesions are usually presented as swelling, in the localized form. Subcutaneous mycosis is caused by penetration of causative fungi into the subcutaneous tissue. Histopathology is one of the main tools of diagnosis in mycology as it has the advantages of early diagnosis compared to culture, low cost and it provides a presumptive identification of the infecting fungus. It also gives information about tissue reaction and supplement culture report. It gives the idea about the fungus isolated in culture is contaminant or pathogenic. Many a times tissue might be sent in formalin as fungal infection is not suspected clinically. Role of histopathologist is very important in diagnosing these subcutaneous fungal lesions.
Material &Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on subcutaneous fungal infections seen between January 2014 to December 2018 in the Department of pathology, IGMC&RI, Puducherry. Twenty-two patients with biopsy proven subcutaneous fungal infections were included in the study. In the present study, the varied histopathological features like type of inflammatory response, presence of granulomas, necrosis, eosinophils and abscess formation were seen in the tissue sections.
Results: The most common histopathology feature was giant cell reaction seen in 21 (95.5%) cases, followed by epithelioid cell granuloma in 13(59%) cases and areas of necrosis in 13 (59%) cases. Eight (36%) cases showed numerous eosinophilic infiltration 10(46%) cases of scant eosinophils and 4 (18%) cases showed absent eosinophils. These fungal structures were identified in H&E stain itself in 13 (59%) cases.
Conclusion: Histopathological study is most important in subcutaneous mycosis as most of the time diagnosis is unsuspected and delayed because of its rarity and varied presentation. Fungal infection should be suspected in cases with localized cystic swelling. High index of suspicion, careful microscopic examination and special stains are important for accurate diagnosis.
Downloads
References
Priyadharshini G, Varghese RG, Phansalkar M, Ramdas A, Authy K, Thangiah et al. Subcutaneous Fungal Cysts Masquerading as Benign Lesions – A Series of Eight Cases. J Clin and Diagn Res. 2015;9(10):1-4. doi: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/14157.6637.
Sivayogana R, Madhu R, Ramesh A, Dhanalakshmi UR. A Prospective Clinico mycological study of deep mycoses in a tertiary centre in Tamil Nadu. Int J Res Dermatol. 2018; 4(2):126-135. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20181482.
Verma S, Thakur BK, Raphael V, Thappa DM. Epidemiology of subcutaneous mycoses in northeast India: A retrospective study. Indian J Dermatol 2018; 63(6):496-501.doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_16_18.
Rickerts V, Mousset S, Lambrecht E, Tintelnot K, Schwerdtfeger R, Presterl E et al. Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture, and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect invasive mold infections from biopsy specimens. Clinical Infectious Dis. 2007 ;44(8):1078-1083. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/512812.
Schwartz J. The diagnosis of deep mycoses by morphologic methods. Hum Pathol. 1982;13(6):519-533. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(82)80267-0.
Chintagunta S, Arakkal G, Damarla SV, Vodapalli AK. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis in an immunocompetent individual: a case report. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2017;8(1):29-31. doi: http://www.idoj.in/text.asp?2017/8/1/29/198770.
Chandler FW, Watts JC. Fungal Diseases. In: Damjanov I, Linder J, editors. Anderson's Pathology. 10th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1996.pp 951-962.
Guarner J, Brandt ME. Histopathologic diagnosis of fungal infections in the 21st century. Clinic Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(2):247-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00053-10.
O'Donnell PJ, Hutt MS. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis: a histopathological study of nine cases from Malawi. J Clin Path. 1985;38(3):288-292. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jcp.38.3.288.
Mishra D, Singal M, Rodha MS, Subramanian A. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomycosis of foot in an immunocompetent host. J Lab Physicians. 2011;3(2):122-124. doi: http://www.jlponline.org/text.asp?2011/3/2/122/86848.
Madke B, Khopkar U. Pheohyphomycotic cyst. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2015;6(3):223-225. doi: http://www.idoj.in/text.asp?2015/6/3/223/156429.
Revankar SG. Phaeohypomycosis. Infect DIS Clin North Am. 2006; 20(3):609-20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2006.06.004.
Sharma NL, Mahajan V, Sharma RC, Sharma A. Subcutaneous pheohyphomycosis in India - a case report and review. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(1):16-20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2002.01337.
Bhat RM, Mo nteiro RC, Bala N, Dandakeri S, Martis J, Kamath GH et al. Subcutaneous mycoses in coastal Karnataka in south India. Int J Dermatol. 2016; 55(1):70-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijd.12943.
Abraham LK, Joseph E, Thomas S, Matthai A. Subcutaneous phaeohyphomyco¬sis: a clinicopathological study. Int Surg J. 2014; 1(3):140-143. doi: https://doi.org/10.5455/2349-2902.isj20141106.
Pang KR, Jashin WJ, Huang DB, Tyring SK. Subcutaneous fungal infections. Dermat Ther. 2004; 17(6):523-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04056.x.
OAI - Open Archives Initiative
