E-ISSN:2456-1487
P-ISSN:2456-9887
RNI:MPENG/2017/70771

Research Article

COVID-19

Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

2021 Volume 7 Number 6 November December
Publisherwww.medresearch.in

Relationship between Blood Group and Risk of Infection, Intubation and Death in Covid Pandemic

Singh R.1*, Siddiqui M.2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2021.i06.02

1* Renu Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jalaun, Orai, Uttar Pradesh, India.

2 M Siddiqui, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jalaun, Orai, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Background: Few people infected by the coronavirus become seriously ill, while others show mild symptoms or are asymptomatic. Recent research points out that the ABO blood group might play an essential role in a person’s susceptibility and severity of COVID-19 infection. Aims: This study is conducted to find the relationship between ABO groups and COVID-19 infection. Methods: A total of 395 patients were included in this study. The study population was divided based on ABO blood groups into types A+, A−, B+, B −, AB, O+, and O−. Results: Blood group B was associated with high susceptibility to infection. We found slightly increased infection prevalence among the Rh factor positive blood group. The risk of infection was decreased among blood groups with Rh factor negative. Cases having blood group B have higher chances of covid-19 infection followed by AB and type O. Conclusion: We estimated Rh-negative blood types to have a protective effect for covid -19 infection. Our results add to the growing body of evidence suggesting blood group type may play a role in COVID-19 infection.

Keywords: COVID-19, ABO blood groups, Severity, Infection

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Renu Singh, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jalaun, Orai, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Email:
Renu Singh, M Siddiqui, Relationship between Blood Group and Risk of Infection, Intubation and Death in Covid Pandemic. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2021;7(6):280-285.
Available From
https://pathology.medresearch.in/index.php/jopm/article/view/582

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2021-11-27 2021-11-29 2021-12-06 2021-12-13 2021-12-20
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
Nil Nil Yes 19%

© 2021by Renu Singh, M Siddiquiand Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

The new infectious coronavirus disease 2019, called COVID-19, began to spread from China in December 2019 [1]. The most evident COVID-19 symptoms are pneumonia and respiratory failure, which reiterate the symptoms reported in the SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) epidemic of 2003 [2,3].  On 11 March 2020, the World Health Organization declared it a pandemic [4,5]. The novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) has spread rapidly across the globe and has caused over 21.1 million confirmed infections and over 761,000 deaths worldwide as of August 17, 2020 [6].

Since specific biological rules characterize each disease, it is necessary to consider them to build an adequate mathematical model to describe real situations. The pattern comprises a first phase, indicated by an exponential increase of infections, and a later phase, social distancing measures reduces the spread of the disease, generally followed by a gradual decrease of daily infections. Finally, the number of daily infections becomes smaller than the daily recovered ones, thus allowing the number of infected individuals to decrease. Even if this general pattern has been reproduced around the world, the spread of the virus showed important local differences, mainly in the rate of the initial exponential spread. From this historical event, it is extremely difficult to understand if these patterns are the consequence of geographical inhomogeneities or if these are spurious correlations that are caused by the singularity of the observed event. Indeed, some works underlined as in the early stage of the epidemics, the recorded geographical pattern is characterized by the localization of most of the infection in temperate regions, distinguished by specific temperature and humidity characteristics [7,8]. Other hypothesized co-morbidities that may explain local differences are hypertension, obesity, and age distribution, which display heterogeneous regional distributions [9,10].

In particular, blood groups were recognized to influence susceptibility to certain viruses, including SARS-CoV-1 [11] and Norwalk virus [12]. Blood group A and B glycosyltransferases also affect glycosylation in many cell types, including epithelial cells in the respiratory tract and shed viral particles [13]. Recently, Zhao et al.

 [14] found that ABO blood groups presented a different risk to contract COVID-19 due to being exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Previously, for the similar coronavirus SARS-CoV responsible for SARS, Guillon et al. [15] investigated whether ABO antibodies could stop the interaction between the SARS-CoV receptor and ACE2. They found that the S protein expressed by A-positive–infected cells shares epitopes of the A histo-blood group in vitro, the adhesion of S protein and ACE2 can be inhibited by the anti-A natural antibody. The anti-A and anti-B natural antibodies being produced in individuals with blood group O could potentially block viral adhesion to cells, which could explain their lower risk of infection.

Starting from these experimental results regarding the SARS-CoV spike, Breiman et al. [16] extended the hypothesis to the new SARS-CoV-2, suggesting the different susceptibility of individuals with other ABO blood groups may have the same explanation.

Keeping these facts in mind, we conducted a study to discover association between blood group and COVID-19 infection. Because there is not much primary evidence regarding the association between blood groups and COVID-19 infection, upcoming relevant studies will be added to the present study results.

Material And Method

The study was conducted on 395 COVID-19-confirmed patients admitted to Government Medical College, Orai, Jalaun, UP, India, for two years. The Ethical Committee approved the study. Data were extracted from a number of COVID-19 infections in each blood group, A, B, O and AB. The required data were entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets and data analyzed on SPSS version 25.0. Standard error was calculated to assess the frequency of COVID-19 infection in each blood group.

Inclusion criteria: Inclusion criteria were as follows: Relationship between ABO blood group and COVID-19 infection; that reported frequency of COVID-19 among different ABO blood groups.

Exclusion criteria: Not confirmed case of COVID-19.

The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by a positive real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction test of SARS-CoV-2 on nasal and


pharyngeal swab specimens from patients. ABO grouping was done through a blood grouping reagent anti-monoclonal diagnostic test kit manufactured by Mediclone Biotech Private Limited, India. To determine the severity of COVID-19 infection, ACEP2020 divided patient conditions into the following:

(a) Mild low risk.
(b) Mild at risk.
(c) Moderate.
(d) Severe.
(e) Critical.

We followed up the patients to know the prognosis of the disease, cured or died (from 14 to 39 days).

Results

Table 1: Distribution of cases according to age groups. 

Age group No. of cases Percentage
0-20 25 6.33
21-30 71 17.97
31-40 34 8.61
41-50 59 14.94
51-60 102 25.82
61-70 72 18.23
>70 32 8.10
Total 395 100
Mean ±SD 48.72±18.19  

People of age group 40-70 years were more susceptible to covid-19 infection, more common 51-60 years of age group (25.82%). The mean age of covid-19 disease is 48.72±18.19 years.

Table 2: Distribution of cases according to sex.

Sex No. of cases Percentage
Male 262 66.33
Female 133 33.67
Total 395 100

There was a male preponderance of 66.33% in Covid-19 infected cases.

Table 3: Distribution of cases according to blood group.

Blood group No. of cases Percentage
A+ 64 16.20
A- 10 2.53
B+ 159 40.25
B- 10 2.53
AB+ 38 9.62
AB- 0 0.00
O+ 106 26.84
O- 8 2.03
Total 395 100

The maximum cases have blood group B 42.78% followed by O group 28.87%. Least no. of cases were having AB blood group.

Table 4: Distribution of cases according to Rh factor. 

Rh factor  No. of cases Percentage
Positive 367 92.91
Negative 28 7.09
Total 395 100

92.91% of covid-19 infections were Rh factor positive.

Discussion

A better understanding of COVID-19 is imperative, which has given the current pandemic’s toll. We investigated whether blood type is relevant for the risk of infection, intubation and death. Overall, we found modest but consistent risk differences between blood types. After adjusting for ancestry (the relevant confounder for this analysis), estimated risk differences were larger for intubation and death outcomes than the initial infection. We assessed more considerable risk differences between Rh blood types than between ABO types, with Rh-negative individuals being at lower risk of all the three outcomes. Type A had a lower risk of infection and intubation, and death compared with AB and O blood groups. Only blood group B had inconsistent effects between Covid -19 infection, intubation and death. Cases having blood group B had increased risk of intubation and decreased risk of death compared to blood group O. We also found consistent evidence for protective associations between Rh-negative blood groups and SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Blood type appears to have a consistent effect, though the magnitudes of these effects on risk of intubation are modest, and our estimates have significant uncertainties relative to their magnitudes.

Our study suggests that maximum suspects were from blood group B 42.78%, O group 28.87%. Least no. of cases were having blood group AB.

In our study, 42.78% of cases infected by Covid-19


were of blood group B, and the least no. of patients were of blood group AB. The activity of ACE2 in blood group B is much higher than in blood group O [17], leading  to higher viral infection resulting in higher mortality and morbidity in patients of blood group B than blood group O.

In the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic, it was shown that anti-A antibodies in individuals with blood group O prevented the invasion of the S protein into the tissues [18]. It has been claimed that, due to the same mechanism, this will cause less infection in individuals with blood group O in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic [19,20]. Although there are anti-A antibodies in blood group B, no published studies show that blood group B is less susceptible to SARS-CoV-2.

Individuals with blood group O have a lower angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) level, while blood group A has a positive association with ACE activity [21]. ACE is an enzyme that activates angiotensin; the lower level of this enzyme can thus reduce the risk of hypertension [22], which is a COVID-19 risk factor [23]. This is another proposed mechanism for developing more severe COVID-19 disease in blood group A and less severe disease in blood group O [21]. Although ACE2 is the virus receptor, it can have some benefits. For example, it can attenuate inflammatory response and redox stress; and it can counterbalance the ACE effect, and in the case of lower ACE levels, it can work even more effectively [21,24].

Although the primary receptor for SARS-CoV-2 is ACE2 [25], like many pathogens that bind to specific terminal carbohydrates [26], SARS-CoV-2 binds to the carbohydrates that determine the ABO blood groups, which are extensively expressed in the mucous membrane of the respiratory tract [25,27]. Therefore, blood group AB has the most contact and blood group O the least with the pathogen [25].

Results were also consistent with an association discovered for SARS-CoV-1, in which O blood groups were less common among SARS patients [28]. Our results are also most consistent with the results reported by Zhao et al. [29] and Ellinghaus et al. [30], non-O appears to be at greater risk of infection but a lesser chance of mechanical ventilation. However, the authors note that this decreased risk is not statistically significant at the 5% level. Unlike Ellinghaus et al., though,

we estimated a slightly higher risk for types B and AB relative to O for intubation.

Conclusion

In this novel study, we report an association between the ABO blood group and COVID-19 susceptibility, demonstrating the latter as a biomarker differentiating the former. In this study, there was an association between the ABO blood group and COVID-19 susceptibility and severity. Specifically, people with blood group B have a higher susceptibility and severity, whereas people with Rh factor negative have a lower chance of infection.

People with blood group B:

1) People with blood group B might need particularly strengthened personal protection to reduce the chance of infection.

2) SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with blood group B might need to receive more vigilant surveillance and aggressive treatment and close observation

What does the study add to existing knowledge?

It might be helpful to introduce ABO blood typing in managing COVID-19 infection. The interest of this study assists people in realizing the relationship between the ABO blood group and the condition, severity and demise of COVID-19. Moreover, further investigations and studies are recommended to clarify the present finding and provide more beneficial insights into COVID-19.

Author Contributions: Dr Renu Singh conceived the main idea, wrote the manuscript and performed the statistical analysis. Dr M.Siddiqui collected the data and critically revised the manuscript. Both the authors approved the manuscript final version and took responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data.

Reference

01. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):470-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30185-9 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

02. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y,


et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

03. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

04. Anon. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19—11 March 2020. . doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar] [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

05. Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D. Structure, Function, and Antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein. Cell. 2020 Apr 16;181(2):281-292. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

06. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Weekly Epidemiological Update 1 World Health Organization WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 Weekly Epidemiological Updates (2020-08-17). . . 2020 Apr 16;181(2):281-292. e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar] [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

07. Sajadi MM, Habibzadeh P, Vintzileos A, Shokouhi S, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Amoroso A. Temperature, Humidity, and Latitude Analysis to Estimate Potential Spread and Seasonality of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e2011834. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.11834 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

08. Scafetta N. Distribution of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic and Its Monthly Forecast Based on Seasonal Climate Patterns. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 17;17(10):3493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103493 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

09. Kershaw KN, Diez Roux AV, Carnethon M, Darwin C, Goff DC Jr, Post W, et al. Geographic variation in hypertension prevalence among blacks and whites: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am

J Hypertens. 2010 Jan;23(1):46-53. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2009.211 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

10. Samouda H, Ruiz-Castell M, Bocquet V, Kuemmerle A, Chioti A, Dadoun F, et al. Geographical variation of overweight, obesity and related risk factors: Findings from the European Health Examination Survey in Luxembourg, 2013-2015. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0197021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197021 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. Cheng Y, Cheng G, Chui CH, Lau FY, Chan PK, Ng MH, et al. ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1450-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1450-c [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Hutson AM, Atmar RL, Graham DY, Estes MK. Norwalk virus infection and disease is associated with ABO histo-blood group type. J Infect Dis. 2002 May 1;185(9):1335-7. doi: 10.1086/339883 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Yamamoto F, Cid E, Yamamoto M, Blancher A. ABO research in the modern era of genomics. Transfus Med Rev. 2012 Apr;26(2):103-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2011.08.002 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Zhao J, Yang Y, Huang H, Li D, Gu D, Lu X, et al. Relationship Between the ABO Blood Group and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):328-331. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1150 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Guillon P, Clément M, Sébille V, Rivain JG, Chou CF, Ruvoën-Clouet N, et al. Inhibition of the interaction between the SARS-CoV spike protein and its cellular receptor by anti-histo-blood group antibodies. Glycobiology. 2008 Dec;18(12):1085-93. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwn093 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Breiman A, Ruvën-Clouet N, Le Pendu J. Harnessing the natural anti-glycan immune response to limit the transmission of enveloped viruses such as SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 2020 May 21;16(5):e1008556. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008556 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


17. Chung CM, Wang RY, Chen JW, Fann CS, Leu HB, Ho HY, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies new loci for ACE activity: potential implications for response to ACE inhibitor. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010 Dec;10(6):537-44. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2009.70 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

18. Guillon P, Clément M, Sébille V, Rivain JG, Chou CF, Ruvoën-Clouet N, et al. Inhibition of the interaction between the SARS-CoV spike protein and its cellular receptor by anti-histo-blood group antibodies. Glycobiology. 2008 Dec;18(12):1085-93. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwn093 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

19. Zhao J, Yang Y, Huang H, Li D, Gu D, Lu X, et al. Relationship Between the ABO Blood Group and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Susceptibility. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 15;73(2):328-331. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1150 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

20. Göker H, Aladağ Karakulak E, Demiroğlu H, Ayaz Ceylan ÇM, Büyükaşik Y, Inkaya AÇ, et al. The effects of blood group types on the risk of COVID-19 infection and its clinical outcome. Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Jun 23;50(4):679-683. doi: 10.3906/sag-2005-395 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

21. Dai X. ABO blood group predisposes to COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular diseases. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Sep;27(13):1436-1437. doi: 10.1177/2047487320922370 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

22. van Vark LC, Bertrand M, Akkerhuis KM, Brugts JJ, Fox K, Mourad JJ, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158,998 patients. Eur Heart J. 2012 Aug;33(16):2088-97. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

23. Hessami A, Shamshirian A, Heydari K, Pourali F, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Moosazadeh M, et al. Cardiovascular diseases burden in COVID-19: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:382-391. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.10.022 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

24. Zheng Z, Peng F, Xu B, Zhao J, Liu H, Peng

J, et al. Risk factors of critical & mortal COVID-19 cases: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2020 Aug;81(2):e16-e25. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.021 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

25. Arend P. How blood group A might be a risk and blood group O be protected from coronavirus (COVID-19) infections (how the virus invades the human body via ABO(H) blood group–determining carbohydrates). Availableat:. 10August2020. [Article][Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

26. Preece AF, Strahan KM, Devitt J, Yamamoto F, Gustafsson K. Expression of ABO or related antigenic carbohydrates on viral envelopes leads to neutralization in the presence of serum containing specific natural antibodies and complement. Blood. 2002 Apr 1;99(7):2477-82. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.7.2477 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

27. Mattos, Luiz C. de, and Haroldo W. Moreira. "Genetic of the ABO blood system and its link with the immune system. " Revista Brasileira de Hematologia e Hemoterapia 26.1 (2004): 60-63 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

28. Cheng Y, Cheng G, Chui CH, Lau FY, Chan PK, Ng MH, et al. ABO blood group and susceptibility to severe acute respiratory syndrome. JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1450-1. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.12.1450-c [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

29. Zhao, J. , et al. "X. , Wang, PG (2020). Relationship between the ABO blood group and the COVID-19 susceptibility." MedRxiv [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

30. Severe Covid-19 GWAS Group, Ellinghaus D, Degenhardt F, Bujanda L, Buti M, Albillos A, et al. Genomewide Association Study of Severe Covid-19 with Respiratory Failure. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1522-1534. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2020283 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]