An analytical study of discarded
units of whole blood in blood bank of KIMS
Hubballi, a tertiary care hospital of North Karnataka
Giriyan S.S.1, Bajpai R2,
Agrawal A.3, Nirala N.K.4
1Dr. Sujata S Giriyan, Professor and Head, 2Dr. Richa Bajpai, Post
Graduate Resident, 3Dr. Akanksha Agrawal, Post Graduate Resident, 4Dr.
Niraj Kumar Nirala, Post Graduate Resident, all authors are attached
with Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences,
Hubli, Karnataka, India
Address of
Correspondence: Dr. Richa Bajpai, Department of
pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi,
Karnataka. Email: dr.richa3110@gmail.com
Abstract
Objective:
Blood is a vital fluid for the body which should be properly stored and
utilized so that it can be used in emergencies. This study has been
done to determine the number of units of whole blood discarded in blood
bank of Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, the various
reasons of discards and the methods for reducing this wastage. Methods: The study
was conducted for the period of 9 years from January 2007 to December
2015 wherein the number of collected blood units, blood units discarded
and reasons for discard of these blood units in this period, was
analysed. Discarded blood unit with respect to the blood group was also
studied for last six years i.e. from January 2010 to December 2015. Results: The total
blood storage units for the period of 9 years were 80,312 units, of
which, 4,685 bags were discarded. There were various reasons found
behind this wastage. The main reason being the transfusion transmitted
infections which accounted for 2113 units (45.10%). Other reasons being
suboptimal collection of blood bags (8.13%), damaged bags (1.66%),
expired bags (37.78%). Conclusion:
Blood transfusion is an essential part of patient care. It is important
to implement proper blood transfusion management policies which will
help utilize the blood and it’s components in a more
efficient manner with minimal wastage
Keywords:
Blood bank, Blood bags, Camps, Transfusion transmitted infections,
Wastage of blood
Manuscript received: 24th
April 2017, Reviewed:
2nd May 2017
Author Corrected:
11th May 2017, Accepted
for Publication: 18th May 2017
Introduction
Human blood cannot be manufactured and hence there are no substitutes
for it. It has been estimated that every two seconds someone needs
blood. Over one third of all patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit
receive a blood transfusion [1]. Each unit of blood is therefore,
precious and has to be utilised judiciously with minimal discards.
Blood donated is collected in blood bags and stored under standard and
optimal conditions to help maintain its viability, such that it can be
issued for the patients in need. Even with proper care, there are
various reasons due to which many blood bags are wasted universally.
Although unavoidable in few cases, the overall wastage should be
minimized.
This study highlights the main reasons for discards of blood units in a
tertiary care hospital blood bank and also the need for proper
implementation of standard policies in management. This further can
help reduce the total wastage to a lowest possible level.
Materials
and Methods
This was a retrospective study where analysis of number of collected
blood units, blood units discarded and reasons for discard of blood
units was done for a period of nine years from January 2007 to December
2015 in Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), Hubballi blood
bank. The blood was collected from suitable healthy donors as per the
protocol of this blood bank and standardized selection criteria. Donors
who did not meet the criteria were excluded at the time of donation
itself.
Identity and sex of the donors was not revealed anywhere in this study
and prior permission was obtained from the institutional ethical
committee.
The data collected was analysed and tabulated. An elaborate account of
each discarded blood unit in respect to its blood group was tabulated
for last six years only i.e. from January 2010 to December 2015 as the
corresponding documents were not available for previous years.
Results
The total number of blood storage units in KIMS blood bank over a
period of these nine years was 80,312. Of these 4,685 (5.83%) units
were discarded for various reasons.
Table-1: Number of units
of blood discarded out of total storage units over a period of 9 years
Year
|
Total Storage
|
Total Discards
|
2007
|
8460
|
240
|
2008
|
8376
|
305
|
2009
|
10503
|
663
|
2010
|
8447
|
355
|
2011
|
8713
|
400
|
2012
|
9291
|
1124
|
2013
|
8425
|
495
|
2014
|
8660
|
657
|
2015
|
9437
|
446
|
Various reasons for the discard of blood units from the most common to
least common were sero-positivity for transfusion transmitted
infections i.e. 2113 (45.10%), Suboptimal collection of blood units-381
(8.13%); Damaged bags-78 (1.66%); Expiry of blood units-1770 (37.78%);
others-341 (7.27%) which included reasons like hemolysis and
Indeterminate seroreactivity.
Of all the Transfusion transmitted
infections, HIV was found in 288 (13.62%) units, Hepatitis B in 1613
(76.33%), Hepatitis C in 194 (9.18%) and Syphilis in 18 (0.85%) units.
Discussion
The demand for blood transfusion in modern day health care and surgical
procedures is increasing with the improvement in diagnosing the complex
diseases and assessing accurately the need for blood replacement [2]. A
judicious use of blood can save a life and its proper management can
avoid wastage.
In our study out of 80,312 units 4,685(5.83%) were discarded (Table 1,
fig 1). A study done by Suresh et al shows that out of 5261 units of
blood, 298(5.7%) were discarded [2]. Nayana et al in their
study concluded that out of total 15,084 blood units, 618(4.09%) were
discarded [3].
As studied there are various reasons for discarding blood units (figure
2). The main reason for discards is transfusion transmitted infections.
Transfusion transmitted reactions include infections like Hepatitis B
and C, HIV, Syphilis etc. In present study, among the total discards
due to transfusion transmitted infections (n=2113), Hepatitis B was
found to be most common cause (76.33%) followed by HIV (13.62%) and
Hepatitis C (9.18%). Syphilis was found in very few cases (0.85%) as
depicted in figure 3.
In a study by Suresh et al 49% discards were due to transfusion
transmitted reactions [2]. In another study by Thakare et al, 68.90% of
units were discarded due to Transfusion transmitted infections of
which, 49.8% were reactive for Hepatitis B, 10% for HIV, 9% for
Hepatitis C and no units were reactive for syphilis [4].
Although the risk of transfusion transmitted infections today is lower
than ever, the supply of safe blood products remains subject to
contamination with known and yet to be identified human pathogens.
Strict adherence to donor selection guidelines can decrease collection
of such units.
Apart from transfusion transmitted infections another reason for
discarding blood units in present study was suboptimal collection
(8.13%). Morish et al in their study concluded under collection as the
main reason for discarding blood units i.e. 52% [5]. In a study by
Suresh et al discards due to suboptimal collection was found to be 9.5%
[2].
Sub-optimally collected blood unit is unsuitable for transfusion as
blood to anticoagulant ratio is altered. This could be attributed to
discontinuation of donation due to donor disapproval or due to
phlebotomy failure. Proper counselling of the donors and proper
phlebotomy technique respectively can minimise these problems.
Plausible cause of damage of bags could be mishandling during
processing and storage [6,7]. Sometimes bags can also be damaged during
the process of centrifugation [8]. In this study discards due to
damaged or broken bags was found to be (2.57%) in contrast to results
obtained by Suresh et al in which damaged bags accounted for 3% of the
discards [2].
In present study 38.05% bags were discarded due to Expiry of shelf life
of blood bags. However, Suresh et al and Nayana R. Lakum et al
concluded that discarded blood units due to expiry were 25.1% and
16.01% respectively [2,3].
The reason for Expiry of shelf life could be attributed to
target achieving mass blood donation camps which can lead to more
collection than utilisation. Sometimes Blood bags received from other
Blood banks with short expiry have resulted in wastage of bags.
Apart from these causes, we also evaluated other reasons like
haemolysis and indeterminate sero-reactivity which comprised of 7.27%
of all discards. Suresh et al, in their study concluded that 13.4% of
all discards were due to these reasons and Nayana R Lakum et al
obtained a value of 14.23% [2,3].
Occurrence of more than one camp at distant places with limited
refrigeration facility could be a reason for haemolysis and discards
and also the camps which are held from early morning to late evening
leads to failure of cold chain maintenance resulting in hemolysis.
Total units discarded in our study were 4685 (5.83%) out of total
80,312 which was similar to other studies done. [2,3,4,5].
Our study is significant as it has a very large sample size of 80,312
over a period of nine years. Also by assessing the number of discarded
blood units, blood bank can be better managed in order to minimize the
wastage.
Conclusion
Properly implemented blood transfusion management policies will help
utilize the blood components in a way which results in discarding
lesser number of blood bags. To avoid wastage of blood bags we should
follow a properly conducted donor screening, notification and
counselling of permanently deferred donors.
Good coordination of blood bank staff, clinicians and expert
phlebotomists as well as regular visual inspection and good storage
facilities can help in better overall management of blood banks which
would result in decrease in the number of discarded blood units.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Saxena S, Weiner JM, Rabinowitz A, Fridey J, Shulman IA, Carmel R.
Transfusion practice in medical patients. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Nov
22;153(22):2575-80. [PubMed]
2. B. Suresh, K.V. Sreedhar Babu, R. Arun, P. Chandramouli, D.S.
Jothibai. Reasons for discarding whole blood and its components in a
tertiary care teaching hospital blood bank in South India. J Clin Sci
Res. 2015;4: 213-9.
3. Lakum NR, Makwana H, Agnihotri A. An analytical study of discarded
units of whole blood and its components in a blood bank at a
tertiary-care hospital in Zalawad region of Saurashtra. Int J Med Sci
Public Health. 2016); 5(2): 318-321.
4. Thakare MM, Dixit JV, Goel NK. Reasons for discarding blood from
blood bank of government medical college, Aurangabad. Asian J Transfus
Sci. 2011 Jan;5(1):59-60. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.76009. [PubMed]
5. Morish M, Ayob Y, Naim N, Salman H, Muhamad NA, Yusoff NM. Quality
indicators for discarding blood in the National Blood Center, Kuala
Lumpur. Asian J Transfus Sci 2012;6:19-23. [PubMed]
6. Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood
component. 12th edition. France: Council of Europe Publishing;
2006.p.242-8.
7. World Health Organization. Quality systems for blood safety:
introductory module guidelines and principles for safe blood
transfusion practice. Geneva: World Health Organsization;2002.p.65- 75.
8. Novis DA, Renner S, Friedberg R, Walsh MK, Saladino AJ. Quality
indicators of blood utilization: three College of American Pathologists
Q-Probes studies of 12,288,404 red blood cell units in 1639 hospitals.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002 Feb;126(2):150-6. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
Giriyan S.S, Bajpai R, Agrawal A, Nirala N.K. An analytical study of
discarded units of whole blood in blood bank of KIMS Hubballi, a
tertiary care hospital of North Karnataka.Trop J Path Micro
2017;3(2):155-158.doi:10.17511/jopm.2017.i2.15.