E-ISSN:2456-1487
P-ISSN:2456-9887
RNI:MPENG/2017/70771

Research Article

Isolated

Tropical Journal of Pathology and Microbiology

2019 Volume 5 Number 8 August
Publisherwww.medresearch.in

Antibiogram of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from various clinical samples of hospitalized patients in a tertiary care hospital of North India

Kaur Gill M.1*, Kaur Gill A.2, Khanna A.3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2019.i08.01

1* Manmeet Kaur Gill, Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

2 Anureet Kaur Gill, BDS Final Year Student, , Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Dental Science and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

3 Ashish Khanna, Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.

Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae is an important cause of nosocomial and community acquired infections worldwide. It exhibits high antibiotic resistance due to production of Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamases (ESBLs) and Carbapenamases. The aim of present study was to know its resistance pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae so as to help local physicians choose appropriate antibiotics for effective infection control. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective study carried out from January 2019 to July 2019 in the department of Microbiology of a tertiary care hospital in North India. The study comprised of a total of 194 non-repeat isolates obtained from various clinical samples received in Microbiology lab for culture & sensitivity testing. All isolates were processed to determine their antimicrobial sensitivity profile. For data analysis SPSS software, version 17.0 and MS excel 2007 were used. Results: Out of total 2155 (22.43%) positive cultures 194 (9%) isolates were that of Klebsiella pneumoniae Most of the isolates obtained were multi-drug resistant, ESBL and Carbapenamase producers. 100% isolates showed resistance to Ampicillin.Conclusion: Since the frequency of multiple drug resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae is alarmingly high, therefore periodic monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility profile of these agents is much needed. This will help physician in selection of appropriate chemotherapy and thus help in effective management of the infections and better patient care.

Keywords: Klebsiella pneumoniae, Clinical samples, Antimicrobial resistance profile

Corresponding Author How to Cite this Article To Browse
Manmeet Kaur Gill, Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Email:
Gill MK, Gill AK, Khanna A. Antibiogram of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from various clinical samples of hospitalized patients in a tertiary care hospital of North India. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;5(8):512-516.
Available From
https://pathology.medresearch.in/index.php/jopm/article/view/297

Manuscript Received Review Round 1 Review Round 2 Review Round 3 Accepted
2019-06-19 2019-06-27 2019-07-04 2019-07-08
Conflict of Interest Funding Ethical Approval Plagiarism X-checker Note
No Nil Yes 8%

© 2019 by Manmeet Kaur Gill, Anureet Kaur Gill, Ashish Khanna and Published by Siddharth Health Research and Social Welfare Society. This is an Open Access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ unported [CC BY 4.0].

Introduction

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a gram negative, encapsulated, non-motile lactose fermenting, facultative anaerobic bacteria belonging to family Entero-bacteriaceae [1, 2]. It is one of the most common causative agents of hospital and community acquired infections. It is usually associated with pneumonia, septicaemia, urinary tract infection but can also cause various other pyogenic infections [3].

Klebsiella pneumoniae is resistant to a wide range of antibiotics. It is intrinsically resistant to ampicillin [4]. A steady increase in Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and its co-resistance to other antimicrobial agents like quinolones and aminoglycoside antibioticshas been observed over past years. These organisms acquire resistance via different pathways mediated by plasmids, transposons, and gene cassettes in integronsetc [5,6]. Carbapenemsare are preferred to treat the infections caused by multi drug resistant (MDR) isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae but recently carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae has been reported (CRKP) [7]. These multi drug resistant organisms (MDROs) poses a serious threat in terms of morbidity and mortality associated with them.

Emergence of resistance of Klebsiella to previously sensitive antibiotics is greatly due to non judicious use of antimicrobial agents [8]. This study was therefore undertaken to update our knowledge on recent trends in resistance patterns among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates obtained from various clinical samples of the patients suffering from infections. This will help clinicians in a rational selection of antimicrobial agents and thus help in better patient management.

Material and Methods

The study was carried out after taking ethical approval from the ethical committee of the institution.

Study design & data collection: It was a prospective study carried out from January 2019 to July 2019. Data collection included information about, age & sex of the patients and a brief clinical history of illness.

Settings: The study was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, S.G.R.D Institute of

Medical Science and Research, Amritsar, Punjab, a tertiary care hospital.

Sample size: The study comprised of a total of 194 non-repeat isolates obtained from various clinical samples received in Microbiology lab for culture & sensitivity testing

Inclusion criteria:All isolates which formed lactose fermenting mucoid colonies on MacConkey agar and further confirmed as Klebsiella pneumoniae by Vitek-2 Compact (Biomerieux) were included i the study.

Exclusion criteria: Species of Klebsiella other than Klebsiella pneumoniae were exclude from the study.

Method: All samples were processed as per standard bacteriological techniques for aerobic cultures [9]. They were inoculated on to Blood and Mac Conkey agar plates and incubated at 37C for 24-48 hours. Isolates of Klebsiella were identified by their colony morphology as it forms large dome shaped colonies on Blood agar and lactose fermenting mucoid colonies on MacConkey agar. Gram staining was performed on the growth obtained in positive cultures which showed Gram negative short and stout rods. Isolates were further identified to specie level by Vitek-2 Compact (Biomerieux) using gram negative identification cards (as per manufacturer’s guidelines).

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was also determined by same system using Vitek-2 AST N 280 cards. Antibiotic sensitivity results were interpreted as per CLSI guidelines [10].

Statistical analysis: SPSS version 17.0 software and MS excel 2007 were used for statistics. Chi-square test was used to know the association between the variable.

Results

A total of 9604 clinical samples were processed for culture and sensitivity testing from January to July 2019. Bacterial growth was obtained in 2155 (22.43%) samples out of which 194 (9%) isolates of the positive cultures, were that of Klebsiella pneumoniae.

The present study comprised of 194 Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Of these 194 samples 112 (57.73%) were obtained from male patients and 84 (42.26%) from female patients (table.1).

Isolation rate was highest in patient aged between


41-60 years followed by those above 60 years of age (table 2). Maximum number of isolates were obtained from pus samples (table 3).

Table-1: Gender wise distribution n=194

Sex Patients with cultures positive for K. pneumoniae
Males 58%
Females 42%

Odds Ratio: 2.078; CI: 1.755-2.450; p <0.001; highly significant

Table-2: Age wise distribution n=194.

Patient’s age group Culture Positive n (%)
less than 1 year 4 (2.06%)
1-20 years 8 (4.12%)
21-40 years 47 (24.22%)
41-60 years 73 (37.62%)
> 60 years 62 (31.95%)

Table-3: Isolation rate of Klebsiella pneumoniae from various clinical samples n=194

Sample Culture positive n (%)
Pus 54 (27.8%)
Urine 42 (21.64% )
Blood 15 (7.73%)
Sputum 15 (7.73% )
Other 68 (35.05%)

Table-4: Antibiogram of Klebsiella pneumoniae n=194.

Antibiotic % Sensitive % Resistant
Ampicillin 0 100
Amoxy- clav 5 95
Gentamicin 11 89
Amikacin 15 85
Cefoperazone-Sulbactam 11 89
Piperacillin-Tazobactam 11 89
Cefepime 4 96
Ceftriaxone 4 96
Imipenem 19 81
Ertapenem 11 89
Ciprofloxacin 4 96
Tegicycline 26 74
Colistin 84 16

Most of the isolates obtained were multi-drug resistant and ESBL and Carbapenamase producers. 100% isolates showed resistance to Ampicillin (table 4).

Discussion

Klebsiella pneumonia is worldwide one of the most

frequently isolated gram negative bacteria from clinical specimens of hospitalized patients [11].

There has been an increase in the incidence of infections with this bacteria during the past decade, probably due to an increase in the number of hospitalized or immune-compromised individuals. Also a trend towards greater antibiotic resistance is seen [12,13]

patho_297_01.jpg

Figure 1: Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to antibiotics

The present study highlights an alarming situation of high antibiotic resistance among the isolates of Klebsiella pneumonia. In the present study (Table 3, Figure 1), 100% isolates showed resistance to Ampicillin. The cause may be chromosomally encoded β-lactamases responsible for intrinsic resistance [14]. A high level of resistant is also observed to the fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Ciprofloxacin was found resistant in 96% where as Amikacin resistance was 85% and Gentamicin 89% respectively. The resistance to flouroquinolones could be due to mutations in the chromosomal genes encoding DNA gyrase of the bacteria or due to efflux of the drug [13]. Cephalosporins like Cefepime and Ceftriaxone were sensitive in 4% only. In a similar study, Anubhuti Khareet al have also reported high resistance to these groups of antibiotics [15].

Among Carbapenems, Imipenem resistance was in 81% and Ertapenem in 89%. It has been documented that enzyme KPC carbapenemase confers resistance to carbapenems, penicillins, and extended-spectrum cephalosporins as well [16]. A high levels of carbapenem resistance has also been reported in a study by Yi Liet al [17]. Since CRKP is resistant to most of the antimicrobial agents, therefore it poses a serious threat to public health [18]. Usually to treat carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, polymyxins and tigecycline are used as they are mostly susceptible to these drugs [19,20].


Unfortunately, in the present study high resistance to tegicycline is seen leaving only colistin as treatment option which also shows 16% resistance. Resistance to colistin has also been reported, with a 17% resistance rate in Taiwan [21] and also in our previous study on pus isolates [22].

The present study also reveals that, there is a predominance of males (58%) over females (42%) (p <0.001) w.r.t. isolation of Klebsiella pneumonia also the infection was observed to be more common in age group 41-60 years. (Table 1&2). This has been documented by other studies also [23]. The highest percentage of Klebsiella pneumonia were isolated were from pus (27.8%) followed by urine (22%), blood (8%) and sputum (8%) (Table 3) which is also In concordance with other studies [24].

Limitation- This study was conducted in only one tertiary care teaching hospital so the situation may differ in other parts of the countries. A multi centric study should be conducted to have a more reliable data.

Conclusion

To conclude, high resistance of Klebsiella pneumonia to commonly used antibiotics is the major reasons for high morbidity and mortality associated with its infections in hospitalised patients. Therefore a regular surveillance of antibiotic susceptibility pattern is needed to prevent indiscriminate use of antibiotics which is a major cause of emergence of drug resistance among pathogens.

What the study adds in the existing knowledge?

The data obtained from the present study can be used to determine trends in antimicrobial resistance of Klebsiella pneumonia, an important nosocomial pathogen and to formulate local antibiotic policy. This will assist clinicians in the rational selection of antibiotic therapy for effective management of patients.

Author’s contribution

Dr. Manmeet Kaur Gill: Research Question framing, Literature search, Study design, Research work, Data collection and data analysis, Manuscript preparation

Anureet Kaur Gill: Assisted in Data compilation

Dr. Ashish Khanna: Assisted in Data analysis

Reference

01. Podschun R, Ullmann U. Klebsiella spp as nosocomial pathogens- epidemiology, taxonomy, typing methods, and pathogenicity factors. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1998;11(4)589-603. doi: 10.1128/CMR.11.4.589 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

02. Winn WC. Koneman's color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. Lippincott williams & wilkins. 2006. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

03. Arti Kapil. Ananthanarayan & Paniker s Textbook of Microbiology. 9thed, Chennai- Universities Press Pvt Ltd. 2013. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

04. Patrick R Murray, Barry Holmes, Hazel M Aucken. Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology & Microbial Infections. Volume 2, 10th edition, Salisbury, UK- Edward Arnold Ltd. 2005. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

05. Kang HY, Jeong YS, Oh JY, Tae SH, Choi CH, Moon DC, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance and class 1 integrons found in Escherichia coli isolates from humans and animals in Korea. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(5)639-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki076 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

06. Stalder T, Barraud O, Casellas M, Dagot C, Ploy MC. Integron involvement in environmental spread of antibiotic resistance. Front Microbiol. 2012;3;119. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00119 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

07. Nordmann P, Cuzon G, Naas T. The real threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(4)228-36. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70054-4 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

08. Pollack M, Charache P, Nieman RE, Jett MP, Reimhardt JA, Hardy PH Jr. Factors influencing colonisation and antibiotic-resistance patterns of gram-negative bacteria in hospital patients. Lancet. 1972;2 (7779)668-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)92084-3 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

09. Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries. Cambridge university press. 2006 Mar 2. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]


10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)- Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 2019; 29th ed-1–319. . [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar] [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

11. Peleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 2010;362 (19)1804-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJ Mra0904124 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

12. Qin X, Hu F. Gastrointestinal carriage of Klebsiella pneumoniaeis a risk factor of subsequent hospital acquired infection. J EmergCrit Care Med. 2017;1;47. doi: 10.21037/jeccm.2017.12.09 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

13. Sarathbabu R, Ramani TV, Rao KB, Panda S. Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from sputum, urine and pus samples. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2012;1(2)04-9. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

14. Sahly H, Aucken H, Benedí VJ, Forestier C, Fussing V, Hansen DS, et al. Increased serum resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(9)3477-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3477-3482.2004 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

15. Petri WA. Penicillins, Cephalosporins and Other B- Lactam Antibiotics, In- Laurence LB, editor, Bruce AC, Bjorn CK, assoc. editors, Goodman and Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12thed, China- McGraw Hill. 2011;1472,1480-1481 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

16. Khare A, Kothari S, Misra V. Incidence and sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6(2)329-33. doi: 10.18203/2319-2003. ijbcp20170324 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

17. Li Y, Shen H, Zhu C, Yu Y. Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections among ICU Admission Patients in Central China- Prevalence and Prediction Model. Bio Med Res Int. 2019;9767313. doi: 10.1155/2019/9767313 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

18. Saidel-Odes L, Borer A. Limiting and controlling carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae. Infection and drug resistance. 2014;7;9-14. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S44358 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

19. Chen LF, Anderson DJ, Paterson DL. Overview of the epidemiology and the threat of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC) resistance. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5;133-41. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S26613 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

20. Munoz-Price LS, Poirel L, Bonomo RA, Schwaber MJ, Daikos GL, Cormican M, et al. Clinical epide-miology of the global expansion of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013;13(9)785-96. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70190-7 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

21. Chiu SK, Wu TL, Chuang YC, Lin JC, Fung CP, Lu PL, et al. National surveillance study on carbapenem non-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan- the emergence and rapid dissemination of KPC-2 carbapenemase. PLoS One. 2013;8(7)e69428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069428 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

22. Gill MK, Sharma S. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic sensitivity patterns of aerobic pus isolates- A study conducted in tertiary care hospital of North India. Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2019;5(2)99-102. doi: 10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2019.021 [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

23. Asha A, Karnaker VK, Rai R. Characterization and Antibiogram of Klebsiella Isolated from Clinical Samples. Int JCurr Microbiol App Sci. 2017;6(7)386-96. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]

24. Biradar S, Roopa C. Isolation and Antibiogram of Klebsiella species from various clinical specimens. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2015;4(9)991-5. [Crossref][PubMed][Google Scholar]