Morphological study of placenta in hypertensive disorders in pregnancy
Bar P. K.1, Ghosh S.2, Gayen P.3, Mandal S.4, De (Pati) A.5, Biswas A6
1Dr. Prasenjit Kumar Bar, Assistant Professor, 2Dr. Saswata Ghosh, Assistant Professor, 3Dr. Prosenjit Gayen, Assistant Professor, 4Dr Saikat Mandal, Demonstrator; 1,2,3,4author are affiliated with Malda Medical College. 5Dr. Anuradha De (Pati), Associate Professor, School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata. 6Aditi Biswas, Assistant Teacher, Mollarpur Girls’ High School, Birbhum, West Bengal, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Prosenjit Gayen, Assistant Professor, Malda Medical College, Malda, West Bengal, India. E-mail: prosenjitdr@gmail.com.
Abstract
Introduction: Hypertensive
disorders are common complications of pregnancy. Thorough macroscopic
and microscopic examination of the placenta provides much insight into
the prenatal health of the baby and the mother. Objectives: 1.
To study the morphological changes in the placenta in pregnant mothers.
2. Comparative study of morphological changes in the placenta among
hypertensive and normotensive pregnant mothers. Methods:
An Observational Prospective Cohort Study was performed. Detail
clinical history taken and placentae were collected from both 40
hypertensive and 40 normotensive mother's delivered in labour room or
operation theatre. Both macroscopical and histopathological examination
was done. Findings were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results:
The comparison of placental diameter, placental thickness, mean
placental weight, placental volume, placental surface area between
hypertensive and normotensive group showed statistically significant
difference (p value < 0.05). Incidence of placental haematoma,
infarction, basement membrane thickening of villi and syncytial knot in
hypertensive group was 20%, 27.5%, 50% and 92.5% & in normotensive
group was 5%, 10%, 12 % and 60% respectively. All cases in hypertensive
group had placental fibrinoid necrosis of villi in comparison to 57.5%
cases in normotensive group (p < 0.05). For fibrosis of villi and
cytotrophoblatic proliferation p value was < 0.05 which was
statistically significant. Conclusion: Effects of
hypertensive disorder in pregnancy reflect in gross and microscopic
findings of placenta which may contribute to the further management of
mother and baby.
Key words: Hypertensive Disorders, Morphology, Placenta, Pregnancy
Author Corrected: 4th June 2019 Accepted for Publication: 9th June 2019
Introduction
Hypertensive
disorders are common complications of pregnancy. How pregnancy
initiates or aggravates hypertension remains unsolved despite decades
of intensive research. Most adverse events like maternal and neonatal
mortality and morbidity are attributable directly to the preeclampsia
syndrome, characterized by new-onset hypertension with proteinuria
during pregnancy [1].
Hypertensive
disorders during pregnancy are classified into 4 categories, as
recommended by the National High Blood Pressure Education Program
Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: 1) chronic
hypertension, 2) preeclampsia-eclampsia, 3) preeclampsia superimposed
on chronic hypertension, and 4) gestational hypertension (transient
hypertension of pregnancy or chronic hypertension identified in the
latter half of pregnancy) [2].
A pregnant woman with a blood pressure of less than 140/90mmHg, throughout the pregnancy, is considered as normotensive [3].
Intrauterine
existence of the fetus is dependent on the vital organ ‘The
Placenta’ [4]. If the placenta is examined minutely it provides
much insight into the prenatal health of the baby and the mother. It is
the vital organ for maintaining pregnancy and promoting normal fetal
development. Placenta is a mirror, which reflects the intrauterine
status of the fetus [5].
It
has been recorded that maternal utero-placental blood flow is decreased
in pre-eclampsia, because there is maternal vasospasm [6,7]. Maternal
vasospasm leads to fetal hypoxia. Fetal hypoxia is not uncommon near
term and it may lead to fetal distress and fetal death [8]. Reduced
maternal utero-placental blood flow leading indirectly to constriction
of fetal stem arteries, has been associated with the changes seen in
the placentae of preeclamptic women [9].
Placentae
from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia had significantly lower
total volumes of parenchyma and villous surface area when compared with
normal pregnancies of comparable gestation [10]. Minor areas of
infarctions are seen in about 25% of placentae from normal pregnancies.
Extensive placental infarction is usually seen in placentae from
preeclamptic mothers [3]. Placenta from preeclamptic mothers tend to
be, on average, smaller than those in uncomplicated pregnancies and
infarcts are more numerous, larger and often centrally located [11].
Histopathological
findings like cytotrophoblastic cellular proliferation; syncytial knot
formation, fibrin plaque formation etc. were present in greater amount
in hypertensive placentae [10].
Objectives
Examination
of the placenta can yield information that may be important in the
immediate and later management of the mother and the infant. This
information may also be essential for protecting the attending
physician in the event of an adverse maternal or fetal outcome.
Universal examination of the placenta in the delivery room, with
documentation of findings and submission of tissue for pathologic
evaluation based on abnormal appearance or certain clinical
indications, is standard medical practice [12].
1. To study the morphological changes in the placenta in pregnant mothers.
2. Comparative study of morphological changes in the placenta among hypertensive and normotensive pregnant mothers.
Materials and Methods
Study type: Observational study.
Study design: Prospective Cohort Study.
Study setting/area, Population and period: The
study was performed on pregnant women attending in the Department of
Pathology& Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of North Bengal
Medical College& Hospital, Sushrutanagar, Darjeeling during the
period of 1st March 2008 to 28th February 2009 (One year).
Sampling
Selection of cohort of hypertensive and normotensive pregnant mothers: A
cohort of pregnant women having hypertension (Blood Pressure (BP) ≥
140/90mm Hg), was selected from the patients attending the antenatal
clinic in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, North Bengal
Medical College & Hospital.
A
total of 55 patients were selected. Out of 55 selected hypertensive
cohorts, 40 patients fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria at
the time of delivery and thereafter in the postnatal period of more
than 12 weeks. Normotensive cohort of pregnant women was selected
randomly from antenatal clinic after applying inclusion and exclusion
criteria for selection. Total 50 normotensive pregnant mothers were
selected. Out of 50 selected normotensive patients, 40 were traced at
the time of delivery and thereafter fulfilling the criteria for
inclusion and exclusion and the placentae were collected.
Inclusion criteria: The pregnant mothers in the age group 20 years to 40 years attended for antenatal check up.
Patients
having detailed history, clinical data, consent & cooperation of
patients, blood & urine report & specimen of placenta available
for examination.
Pregnant women having hypertension (blood pressure (BP) ≥ 140/90mm Hg).
Normotensive (blood pressure of less than 140/90mmHg) pregnant mothers without any illness.
Specimen of placenta collected from the full term delivery cases (i.e, cases completed 37 weeks of gestation)
Exclusion criteria: Patients
with age below 20 years and above 40 years. Other Medical or Surgical
illness. Blood & urine report and consent not available and
patients lost or missing in the follow-up period.
Study Techniques
1. Case history and clinical examination
2. Collection of the specimen
3. Examination of the specimen
4. Follow-up
5. Statistical Analysis
Techniques in detail: It includes clinical study of the cases and examination of placenta after delivery as described below:
1. Detail Case history including LMP recorded and Clinical examination done
2. Collection of the specimen.
Fresh placentae were collected at labor room /Operation theatre, labeled and sent to Pathology Department.
Examination of the specimen: Examinations of placenta were conducted according to proforma adopted by Benirschke and later modified by Woodly et al [13].
Gross examination: Following parameters of the placenta were determined:-
dimensions,
surface area, weight, volume, shape, examination of the fetal surface,
insertion of the umbilical cord and amniotic membranes. Examination of
the maternal surface, blood clots, infarcts, number of cotyledon and
examination of cut sections.
Microscopic examination: Documentation
of most of the findings found in light microscopic were tabulated as
present or absent or nil. Placental infarcts were grouped in the
following manner:
Absent
= 0, infarction involving less than 5% of villous parenchyma=1,
infarcts involving 5-10% parenchyma=2 and infarcts involving more than
10% of the villous parenchyma =3 [7].
Histopathological parameters studied:
Maximum possible fields of each slides were examined to find out the
following- Infarction, Fibrinoid Necrosis of Villi, Thrombosis of Fetal
Artery, Basement membrane Thickening of Villi, Fibrosis of Villi,
Cytotrophoblastic Proliferation and Syncytial Knots:
Statistical Analysis: Statistical
Analysis was done by using Epi-Info software Version 3.3.2 .Statistical
Tests (Pearson Chi-square Test, Independent Samples Test) were applied
whenever it was necessary. For significance p-value <0.05 was taken.
Incidence, Relative risk (RR) & Attributable risks (AR) were
measured from the observations of the study.
Result
Among
the 55 hypertensive pregnant mothers and 50 normotensive pregnant
mothers, 40 mothers in each group were studied. And they were grouped
as-
Group I= Hypertensive pregnant mothers
Group II= Normotensive pregnant mothers
In
both these groups, age of the patients ranged from 20 to 32 years and
both were delivered at term pregnancy. Mean Age = 22.35 years ±
3.026 (S.D.) in hypertensive group and 23.23 years ± 2.636
(S.D.) in normotensive group. Maximum number 27 (67.5%) of hypertensive
mothers belonged to gestational hypertension type.
Mean
birth weight of baby in hypertensive and normotensive groups was 2.4538
kilogram ± 0.19693(S.D) and 2.7423 kilogram ± 0.14430
(S.D) respectively. Normotensive group had 95% normal birth weight in
comparison to hypertensive group, which was 62.5%.
Mean
placental diameter among hypertensive (Fig.1) and normotensives was
15.39cm ± 0.535(S.D.) and 17.91cm ± 0.982(S.D.)
respectively (i.e. lower values in hypertensive group). The comparison
showed statistically significant difference ( p value < 0.05). Mean
placental thickness among the hypertensive group was 2.10 cm ±
0.431 (S.D) and 2.29 cm ± 0.282(S.D) among the normotensvive
group (i.e. lower values in hypertensive group). The difference was
found to be statistically significant in between the groups. p = 0.024
(< 0.05).
Table-1: Showing comparison of mean placental weight between hypertensive and normotensive group.
Placental Weight (Gm) |
Study population |
No. of cases |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Significance |
Group I (Hypertensive) |
40 |
377.00 |
±12.079 |
1.910 |
df=78 t=25.319 P=0.000 (<0.05) |
|
Group II (Normotensive) |
40 |
476.88 |
±21.829 |
3.452 |
Mean
placental weight (table1) among hypertensive and normotensive groups
was 377.00 gm ± 12.079 (S.D) and 476.88 gm± 21.829 (S.D)
respectively (lower in hypertensive group) and the difference was found
to be statistically significant. P value = 0.000 (p<0.05).
Table-2: Showing comparison of mean placental volume between hypertensive and normotensive group.
Placental Volume (ml) |
Study population |
No. of cases |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
Significance |
Group I (Hypertensive) |
40 |
362.25 |
± 10.798 |
1.707 |
df=78 t=43.995 p-value=0.000 (<0.05) |
|
GroupII (Normotensive) |
40 |
564.92 |
± 27.061 |
4.279 |
Mean
placental volume (table 2) was 362.25 ml ± 10.798 (S.D) and
564.92 ml ± 27.061 (S.D) in hypertensive and normotensive group
respectively (i.e. lower placental volume in hypertensive group of
mothers) and difference was statistically significant (p-value =<
0.05). Mean placental surface area was 185.300 sq.cm ± 12.588
(S.D) and 252.404 sq. cm. ± 27.464 (S.D) in hypertensive and
normotensive group respectively which was found to be statistically
significant (p- value< 0.05).
Incidence
of placental macroscopic infarction (27.5%) in group 1 & 7.5% in
group II, the difference was found to be statistically significant,
p-value = 0.019 (<0.05). Relative risk was 3.67 and Attributable
risk was 72.72 %, it indicates 72.72 % of placental macroscopic
infarction was due to hypertension in pregnancy. Incidence of placental
haematoma was 20% in hypertensive group and 5% in normotensive group, 4
times (relative risk = 4) raised in hypertensive group than the
normotensive group, the difference was significant statistically.
Relative risk of placental haemtoma (RR) = 20% / 5% = 4 and
Attributable risk of placental haematoma = (20 – 5) / 20 X 100% = 75% which indicates 75% of placental haematoma due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
Table-3: Showing comparison of different placental infarction groups between hypertensive and normotensive group.
Study Group |
Infarction |
Total |
Significance |
||
Group 0 |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
|||
Hypertensive |
29 (72.5%) |
5 (12.5%) |
6 (15.0%) |
40 (100.0%) |
Pearson Chi-Square Value = 6.865 p = 0.032 df=2 RR = 2.75 AR = 63.6% |
Normotensive |
36 (90.0%) |
4 (10.0%) |
0 0% |
40 (100.0%) |
|
Total |
65 (81.3%) |
9 (11.3%) |
6 (7.5%) |
80 (100.0%) |
Placental
infarction grouped when infarction was absent = 0, involving < 5% of
villous parenchyma = 1, involving 5 – 10% parenchyma = 2) [3].
Incidence of Infarction (Fig. 2) among hypertensive mothers= 27.5% in comparison to 10% in normotensive mothers. Relative risk = 27.5/10= 2.75 and Attributable risk =
(27.5-10) / 27.5 x100= (17.5/27.5) x 100= 3.63%. It indicates that
63.63% of placental infarction due to hypertensive disorders in
pregnancy. (Table 3)
- Group 1 (<5% villous parenchyma involvement) infarction=10% in normotensives & 4.2% in mild hypertensives
- In mild hypertension group 1 and group 2 infarction= 4.2%
- In severe hypertension group 1 and group 2 infarction=25%+37.5%=62.5%
- Severity of infarction had significant relation with the type of hypertension in between the groups (p<0.05).
Table-4: Showing comparison of fibrinoid necrosis of villi between hypertensive and normotensive group.
Fibrinoid Necrosis of villi |
Group1 (Hypertensive Group) |
Group II (Normotensive Group) |
Significance |
Absent |
0 (0%) |
17 (42.5%) |
Pearson Chi-Square Value = 21.587, df= 1, P=0.000001 (<0.05) RR=1.73 AR=42.5 |
Present |
40 (100.0%) |
23 (57.5%) |
|
Total |
40 (100.0%) |
40 (100.0%) |
All
cases in hypertensive group had placental fibrinoid necrosis (Fig. 3
& table 4) of villi in comparison to 57.5% cases in normotensive.
This was found to be statistically significant (p< 0.05). Relative
risk =1.73 and Attributable risk =42.5%. It
means 42.5% of placental fibrinoid necrosis was due to hypertensive
disorders in pregnancy. Incidence of fetal artery thrombosis in
hypertensive group was 10% and in normotensive groups was 2.5%.
Difference was not statistically significant. (p value > 0.05)
Table-5: Showing comparison of basement membrane thickening of villi between hypertensive and normotensive group.
Basement Membrane Thickening of villi |
Group1 (Hypertensvie group) |
GroupII (Normotensive group) |
Significance |
Absent |
20 (50.0%) |
35 (87.5%) |
Pearson Chi-Square Value=21.587 df=1, p- value=0.000001 (p< 0.05) RR = 4 AR = 75% |
Present |
20 (50.0%) |
5 (12.5%) |
|
Total |
40 (100.0%) |
40 (100.0%) |
Incidence
of basement membrane thickening of villi in hypertensive (table 5)
group was 50% in comparison to normotensive group which was 12.5%. It
indicates significant increase in basement membrane thickening of
villi, due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Relative risk = (RR)
= 50% / 12.5% = 4. There is 4 times increased risk of basement membrane
thickening of villi in hypertensive group.
Fig.-1: Photomicrograph showing fetal surface of small irregular
placenta of hypertensive mother (gross examination).
Fig.-2: Photomicrograph showing placental infarct
(H & E Stain x 40) of hypertensive mother
Fig.-3: Photomicrograph showing fibrinoid necrosis of villi, calcification &
syncytial knots (H & E Stain x 40) of hypertensive mother.
Fig.-4: Photomicrograph showing organized arterial
thrombus (H & E Stain x 40) of hypertensive mother
Incidence
of fibrosis of villi in hypertensive group was 95% and in normotensive
group was 52.5%, which was increased significantly in hypertensive
group (p < 0.05). Relative risk (RR) of fibrosis of vill = 1.80 and
Attributable risk (AR) = 44.73%. It indicates 44.73% of fibrosis of
villi due to hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Incidence of
cytotrophoblatic proliferation was 47.5% in hypertensive group and
22.5% in normotensive group. It means significant increased incidence
in hypertensive group, (p < 0.05) with relative risk = 2.11. 52.63 %
increased chance of cytotrophoblastic proliferation is due to
hypertension in pregnancy. Incidence of syncytial knot (Fig. 3) in
hypertensive group was 92.5% and in normotensive group was 60% with
relative risk of 1.54 and Attributable risk = AR = 35.13%. It means
approximately 35% increase chance of syncytial knot was due to
hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
Discussion
Placenta
being a fetal organ shares the same stress and strain, to which the
fetus is being exposed. Thus any disease process affecting the mother
and fetus also has a great impact on the placenta. Normally the
placental morphology varies considerably during its short life span [4].
The
placenta, which is functionally the most important and vital organ
related to intrauterine life, is subjected to various defects and
diseases just as the other vital organs of the body. Various clinical
conditions such as anemia, diabetes, hypertension etc have a
detrimental effect on the placenta, which in different degrees may
seriously affect the health and even the life of the fetus.
Present
study was conducted to examine both macroscopic and microscopic changes
in placentas from hypertensive and normotensive mothers. Some
variations were found to be very specific between the two groups but
other changes were found which cannot be correlated between the two
groups. The observations can be discussed according to the following
headings:
In
the present study mean birth weight of the baby in the hypertensive
group of mothers was lower than the mean birth weight of the baby of
normotensive group of mothers.
Udainia et al observed decrease in the weight of newborn babies in PIH [4]. Similar findings we have found in our study.
Mean
placental diameter (Fig.1) was statistically significant lower value in
hypertensive groups, (p-value <0.05). According to Gray’s
Anatomy by Patrica C average placental diameter was 18.5 cm, which was
close to our observation in normotensive group and higher than the
hypertensive group [16].
The
difference in Mean placental thickness in our study was found to be
statistically significant (p – value < 0.05) with lower
thickness in hypertensive group. Patrica C in Grays Anatomy said
thickness of the placenta was 2.3 cm. which supports our observation in
normotensive groups [16].
The
placental weight (table 1) is the single most important factor
reflecting fetal growth. Placental weight and Mean placental volume
(table 2) in the present study found to be low in hypertensive group
than that of normotensive which was statistically significant, (p <
0.05).
Majumder
S, and Dasgupta H found mean weight of the placenta was significantly
lower in hypertensive group than normotensive group and Damania (1989),
Fox (1994), and Kalousek (1994) also found lower values of placental
volume in hypertensive than normotensive groups [10,17,18,19]. These
mimic the observation of our study.
Mean
placental surface area in our study was 185.300 sq.cm ± 12.588
(S.D) and 252.404 sq. cm. ± 27.464 (S.D) respectively in
hypertensive and normotensive groups. Udainia A, Bhagat SS, Mehta CD
found that the mean surface area was significantly less in severe
hypertension (179.14 cm2) and in mild hypertension (195.98 cm2) as compared to the control group ( 242.56 cm2) [5]. Majumder S and Dasgupta H, and Damania (1989), Fox (1994), and Kalousek (1994), had similar observation [10,17,18,19].
Incidence
of placental infarction was significantly high in hypertensive group (p
< 0.05). Mardi K, and Sharma J, and Salgado SS et al. found
significant increase in the incidence of infarction in placentae of
hypertensive mothers compared to full term normal placentae [20,21].
In
our study Incidence of retro-placental haematoma was significantly
higher in hypertensive group with a relative risk of 4. Fox H (1997)
found 3 fold increase of retro-placental haematoma in placenta of
preeclamptic mothers which mimics observation of our study [22].
All
patients of hypertensive group show fibrinoid necrosis (Fig. 3) of
villi in comparison to 57.5% in the normotensive group, statistically
significant (p< 0.05). (table 4)
Incidence
of fetal artery thrombosis in hypertensive group was 10% and in
normotensive group was 2.5% noted in our study. Benirschke K, Kaufman
P, found thrombosis in 5% of placentae from normal pregnancies [23]. In
our study mild increase in thrombosis was noted but without any
statistical significance.
Significant
increase incidence of Basement membrane thickening of villi (table 5)
was found in hypertensive group (50%) in our study. Soma H.et aland
Jones CJP and Fox H also found increased thickening of the basement
membrane in placentae of hypertensive pregnancies, which supports our
study [24,25].
Incidence
of fibrosis of villi, cytotrophoblastic proliferation and syncytial
knots was increased significantly in hypertensive groups (p-value <
0.05). Association fibrosis of villi with hypertensive diseases in
pregnancy was mentioned in the book of Anderson’s Pathology [26].
Jones CJP, Fox H\ and Majumder S, and Dasgupta H found
significant increase in cytotrophoblastic proliferation in placenta of
hypertensive group [10,25]. Tinney B Parker F and Majumder S, and
Dasgupta H found increased or greater amount of syncytial knots in
placentae of hypertensive pregnancies [10,27]. These findings support
our observation.
Conclusion
Hypertensive
disorders of pregnancy cause many adverse macroscopic and microscopic
changes in placenta which may increase with the severity of the
disease. These findings may help in the treatment of hypertensive
mother and her offspring.
Prevention
of hypertension in pregnancy may decrease the incidence of fetal
hypoxia and low birth weight. Furthermore these may protect the medical
team in case of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patient who does not have
proper history of prenatal checkup and present with emergency situation
during delivery.
Contribution by Authors
1. Dr. Prasenjit Kumar Bar - Concept designing and conducting the study & writing the manuscript.
2. Dr. Prosenjit Gayen, Dr. Saswata Ghosh, Dr. Saikat Mandal and Aditi Biswas - Conducting the study and writing the manuscript.
3. Dr.
Anuradha De (Pati) - Guiding the study procedure, statistical analysis
and preparing the manuscript suitable for publication.
References
How to cite this article?
Kalaivani A.K, Padma R, Bhoopathy P, Sundaresan S, Valluru V. A comparative analysis of demographic and aetiological features in young and old patients of buccal mucosa cancer. Trop J Path Micro 2019;5(5):366-373. doi:10.17511/jopm.2019.i5.6.