ABO and Rhesus Types of Blood Group Distribution in
Blood Donors in Blood Bank, Government Medical College and Hospital-Suryapet,
Telangana: A Tertiary Care Centre Study
Reddy
M.K.1, K. Raja Kumar2, Reddy D.S.3
1Dr.
Madhukar Reddy Kadaru, Assistant Professor, 2Dr. K. Raja
Kumar, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical
College, Suryapet, Telangana, 3Dr. D. Smitha Reddy, Associate Professor,
all authors are affiliated with Department of Pathology, Government Medical
College, Suryapet, Telangana, Andra Pradesh, India.
Abstract
Aims
and objectives: To study the distribution and
frequencies of ABO and Rhesus (Rh) blood groups among blood donors, who
participated in indoor and outdoor blood donation camps organized by suryapet blood
bank, Government medical college-suryapet, Telangana. ABO and Rh typing is very
important for proper functioning and safe blood banking. Materials and Methods: A Three-year retrospective study was carried
out at suryapet blood bank, Telangana, during 3-year period from January 2016
to December 2018 and the total number of blood units collected
was 7,035. The donors were screened and who are medically fit are accepted for
blood donation. Blood group of the blood donors was determined by forward grouping
and reverse grouping methods with the help of commercially available standard
monoclonal antisera. Results: The
most common blood group among donors was “O” (43.90%) followed by “ B”
(32.50%), “A” (17.95%) and the least prevalent blood group was “AB” (05.62%). Maximum
number of blood donors were Rh positive (95.72%) while Rh negative were only
(04.27%). There was a higher rate of male donors than female donors. Conclusion: The present study concludes
that most common blood group was “O” positive and the least common is “AB”. This
data helps in appropriate maintenance of inventory in the blood bank and also
plays important role in patients health care.
Keywords:
ABO, Blood Groups, Blood Donors, Rhesus (Rh),
Genes.
Manuscript received: 2nd March 2019 Reviewed: 11th March 2019
Author Corrected: 16th March 2019 Accepted for Publication: 20th March 2019
Introduction
Each individual has different blood groups. The ABO
blood group system is divided in to four blood types on the basis of presence
or absence of A and B surface antigens determined by ABO genes, located on
chromosome 9q with anti-A and anti-B antibodies in serum of individuals lacking
the corresponding antigen [1].
ABO blood group discovered by Karl Landsteiner for
which he received Noble prize followed by weiner discovery of Rh (D) antigens.
After Von Decastello and Sturli discovered the fourth Type Blood Group AB [2].
The cause of Haemolytic disease of foetus and Newborn (HDFN) was linked to the
Rh Blood group which is very essential in Obstetrics [3].
Blood groups are genetically determined, inherited
in a simple mendelian fashion and are useful in paternity testing, legal medicine,
immune haematology, blood transfusions, unmatched pregnancy. Disease such as
duodenal ulcer, Diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection are known to have
some association with blood groups [4].
The prevalence of ABO Blood groups varies from
region to region and race to race. Data regarding ABO blood group distribution
is very important for effective management of safe blood transfusion services
and Blood bank. Therefore it is essential to have Knowledge regarding
distribution of these blood groups in the population of this study region and
hence this study has been carried out to determine the frequency and
distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in blood donors of tertiary care
hospital of Government Medical College and Hospital-Suryapet, Telangana and to compare
with other studies [3][5].
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study was carried out with 7,035
blood donors aged between 18 to 65 years. These donor subjects had donated
blood in Suryapet blood bank, Government Medical College and General Hospital,
Suryapet and voluntary blood donation camps organized from January 2016 to
December 2018, i.e for three years.
All the donors were screened and interviewed for
health history, medical history including previous transfusions, the donors who
are medically fit are accepted for donations. Blood group of the blood donors
was determined by forward grouping (cell grouping) and reverse grouping (serum
grouping) by test tube agglutination methods with the help of commercially
available standard monoclonal antisera A, anti sera B, antisera O after
validation of the antisera at blood bank. Reverse blood grouping was performed
by test tube agglutination method with pooled known A, B, and O cell types that
are prepared by the blood bank daily. If the both forward (cell group) and
reverse (serum group) grouping are identical than the final blood group is
confirmed. Rh negative blood group were confirmed by anti globulin technique
(Du test). All Du positive were considered as Rh positive group.
The donor blood group data is recorded, tabulated,
analysed and compared with similar studies with other authors.
Sampling Technique:
ABO and Rh grouping was performed for each sample using tube agglutination
method according to our standard operating procedure. The reagents used were
anti-A, anti-B, anti-AB and anti-D manufactured by Tulip Diagnostics (Tulip
Diagnostics (P) Ltd, Verna, Goa, India). All blood group O donors were tested by anti-H lectin (Tulip
Diagnostics (P) Ltd, Verna, Goa, India) to rule out Bombay blood group. All
antisera used were monoclonal reagents and were used after subjecting it to
quality control test. A cells, B cells and O cells prepared in house for
reverse grouping were pooled from three different known donor samples.
Inclusion
Criteria: should be in Good health, more than 45
kg, haemoglobin more than 12gms, no history of recent surgery, negative for pre
donation screening for Transfusion transmitted infections.
Exclusion
criteria: Not included in the study are positive
for transfusion transmitted infections, hypertensive patients on medications, tuberculosis,
kidney diseases, heart diseases, cancer, liver diseases, leprosy.
Statistical analysis: the
data was analyzed by using simple percentages and frequencies. Frequency and
percentage for each variable were calculated and 95% confidence intervals (CI)
were taken to define normal range.
Results
ABO Blood groups of 7,035 healthy blood donors, from
January 2016 to December 2018 with 18 to 65 years of age group was studied out.
The three year Retrospective study revealed that out of 7,035 blood donors majority
were 7,014 (99.70%) male donors and 21(0.29%) were female donors (Table No -1). Most of the donors were
in the age group of 20-40 years.
The distribution of blood groups of donors were,
Blood group A (17.95%), B (32.50%), O (43.90%) and AB (5.62%). In ABO system
our study shows the highest frequency of blood group “O” (43.90%), Followed by
blood group B (32.50%), blood group A (17.95%) and Blood group AB (5.62%) (Table No-2). In Rh system, our study
shows frequency of Rh positive (were most common blood group with (95.72%) while
Rh negative is only (4.27%) respectively (Table
no-2).
Table No-1: Gender
distribution among blood donors.
Gender
|
Gender
distribution in each year |
|||
|
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
Total
(%) |
Male donors |
2562 |
2781 |
1671 |
7014(99.70%) |
Female donors |
08 |
03 |
10 |
21 (0.30%) |
Total
donors |
2570 |
2784 |
1681 |
7035
(100%) |
Table No-2:
Distribution of ABO Blood groups and Rhesus types among blood donors
Blood
groups |
Number
and percentage (%) distribution of Various Blood groups |
Total
(%) |
|
Rhesus
postive |
Rhesus
negative |
||
A |
1208 (17.17%) |
55 (0.78%) |
1263 (17.95%) |
B |
2198 (31.24%) |
89 (1.26%) |
2287 (32.50%) |
O |
2950 (41.93%) |
139 (1.97%) |
3089 (43.90%) |
AB |
378 (5.37%) |
18 (0.25%) |
396 (5.62%) |
Total
(%) |
6734
(95.72%) |
301
(4.28%) |
7035
(100%) |
Discussion
The current study helps us to ensure the knowledge
of the distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in the suryapet blood bank area.
Table-3: Comparative
study on prevalence of ABO and Rh phenotypes in different regions of India (in
percentages)
Region |
Place
of study, (Author,
year) |
ABO
Blood Group |
Rhesus
Group |
||||
A |
B |
O |
AB |
POS.(+) |
Neg(-) |
||
South
India
|
Suryapet, (Present study,2019) |
17.95 |
32.50 |
43.90 |
5.62 |
95.72 |
4.27 |
Tirupathi (Khader F et al. 2018)
[2] |
6.98 |
42.61 |
45.59 |
4.80 |
95.96 |
4.03 |
|
Davanagere (Mallikarjuna et al., 2012)
[6] |
26.15 |
29.85 |
31.76 |
7.24 |
94.8 |
5.2 |
|
Shimoga (Girish c et al. ,2011) [7] |
24.27 |
29.43 |
39.17 |
7.13 |
94.93 |
5.07 |
|
Bangalore (Periyavan et al.,2010) [8] |
23.85 |
29.95 |
39.82 |
6.37 |
94.2 |
5.8 |
|
Tirupathi (Suresh et al., 2015) [9] |
20.0 |
32.2 |
41.7 |
6.1 |
96.9 |
3.1 |
|
North India
|
Haryana ( pawwan et al.,2015) [10] |
22.90 |
38.83 |
28.70 |
9.54 |
90.79 |
9.28 |
Uttarakhand( Garg P et al.,2014) [11] |
28.70 |
32.07 |
28.70 |
10.53 |
94.49 |
5.51 |
|
Amritsar (Kaur H et al.,2013) [12] |
18.01 |
38.06 |
34.31 |
9.62 |
91.28 |
8.72 |
|
Lucknow (Chandra et al., 2012) [13] |
21.73 |
39.84 |
29.10 |
9.33 |
95.71 |
4.29 |
|
Central
India
|
Indore (Gupta NK et al.,2012) [14] |
24.15 |
35.25 |
31.05 |
9.01 |
95.43 |
4.57 |
Bhopal (Rajesh et al.,2015) [15] |
22.52 |
35.92 |
30.99 |
10.55 |
95.42 |
4.57 |
|
East
India
|
Durgapur(Nag et al.,2013) [16] |
23.90 |
35.60 |
34.80 |
7.70 |
94.70 |
5.30 |
Ranchi (Singh A et al., 2016) [5] |
22.09 |
35.15 |
34.73 |
8.03 |
86.46 |
3.54 |
|
West India |
Rajasthan( Manish K et al.,2018) [17] |
15.46 |
39.95 |
35.68 |
8.80 |
91.17 |
8.82 |
Gujarat (Rupali et al.,2017) [18] |
25.19 |
35.65 |
29.11 |
10.05 |
94.09 |
5.1 |
|
Surat (Raja KA et al.,2016) [19] |
24.35 |
34.43 |
32.26 |
8.94 |
95.12 |
4.87 |
Table
No-4: Distribution of ABO and rhesus
blood groups outside India
Region |
Place of study |
ABO
Blood Group |
Rhesus
Group |
||||
A |
B |
O |
AB |
POS.(+) |
Neg(-) |
||
Out
side India |
Pakistan [20] |
27.92 |
32.40 |
29.10 |
10.58 |
90.13 |
9.87 |
Nepal [21] |
34.0 |
29.0 |
33.0 |
4.0 |
96.7 |
3.3 |
|
Britian [22] |
42.0 |
8.0 |
47.10 |
3.0 |
83.0 |
17.0 |
|
USA [23] |
41.0 |
9.0 |
46.0 |
4.0 |
85.0 |
15.0 |
|
Nigeria [24] |
21.60 |
21.40 |
54.20 |
2.80 |
95.20 |
4.80 |
|
Saudi Arabia [25] |
24.0 |
17.0 |
52.0 |
4.0 |
93.0 |
7.0 |
|
Iran [26] |
45.0 |
11.0 |
40 |
4.0 |
92.40 |
7.60 |
The
comparison of frequency and distribution of ABO and Rh group in the blood
donors of current study with similar studies done within India (Table no: 3)
and outside of India (Table no: 4). The studies done in the south part of India
by authors, Khader F et al and
others [2,6-9], showed blood group “O” was commonest, followed by “B”, “A” and
“AB”. The same frequency was found in our study i.e “O” was more frequent than
“B” followed by “A” and “AB” blood groups.
In the studies done in North part of Other Indian
authors observed B positive as most common blood group which is different than
our study [10-19], showed blood group “B” is the commonest followed by O,A, and
AB, which is different from our study.
The distribution of blood in India shows that south India,
“O” is the commonest blood group where as in North, East, West and Central India
“B” is the most frequent group.
In the studies done outside India Other authors
observed B positive as most common blood group which is different than our
study [21-26], the frequent blood group is “O”, followed by “A”, “B” ,and “AB”.
Except in the study done in Pakistan [20], the commonest blood group
is “B” followed by “O”, “A” and “AB”.
The incidence of Rh positive and Rh negative is
similar in all the studies conducted in India and out side India.
In all the studies conducted in India [2] [6-19] the
female donors are very low when compared to male donors. This is might be
because of social taboo, stigma, cultural habits, lack of awareness, lack of motivation
and fear of donation and increase in deferral in female donors due anaemic
conditions.
The physicians should have knowledge about
prevalence of blood groups in there society so that they can treat in
emergencies. In antenatal care it helps in children born with congenital
hemolytic diseases. In ante natal care the rare blood groups like “AB” negative,
the attendants can be warned in advance for arranging the rare blood group.
This helps in patients and treating physician for better management of the
cases.
The physician should also aware about distribution
of blood groups in certain population as there is genetic association of
specific blood groups to certain diseases in certain population. The persons
with A blood group are more frequently affected by coronary heart diseases,
ischemic heart diseases, venous thrombosis and atherosclerosis in contrast to
the persons who are having the blood group “ O” are having protective effect
against these diseases [27] [28] 29]. Similarly when compared to non-“O”
groups, the “O” group individuals have 14% reduced risk of squamous cell
carcinoma and 4% reduced risk of basal cell carcinoma [30]. There is also
reduced risk of pancreatic cancer in blood group “O” individuals [31] [32]. The
“B” antigen individuals are prone for increased risk for ovarian cancer [33]. Some
studies states that blood group “O” individuals will have more prone to
duodenal ulcer and mosquito bite transmitted infections [5]. It is also useful
in population genetic studies, resolving medicolegal cases and preventive
measures against the diseases which are associated with different blood groups.
Conclusion
It is concluded that among 7035 healthy blood donors
we observed that the most common blood group was “O”, followed by “B”(32.50%),
“A”(17.95%)) and “AB”(5.62%)). Among Rhesus (Rh) positive were (95.72%) and
negative were (04.27%). The study helps in patient health care, preparing data
base for blood bank, drafting proper national transfusion policies. This study
helps in creating awareness as to which blood groups should be stored and given
priority and knowledge of blood groups distribution is very important for
health planners for drafting health polices to face the future health
challenges in this region of India, for forensic and clinical studies in this population.
The data generated in this study reveals why there is a deficiency of
particular blood group in particular a area and to encourage the donors for
more frequent blood donations, in our study “A” Rh positive individuals has to
donate more frequently and this helps in reducing maternal mortality rate, anaemic
children, thalasemia patients, acute haemoraghic conditions like road traffic
accidents where is a urgent transfusion required. This study recommends to
conduct similar well designed studies in other geographic area of India to
determine the prevalence of blood group distribution in them.
Acknowledgement-
I sincerely thank Dr. Madhukar Reddy for
collecting the data from blood bank and preparing the manuscript preparation.
References