A study on effect of tobacco on semen quality
Padia B.1,
Dhokiya M.2
1Dr.
Bhumi Padia, Tutor, Department of Pathology, GMERS Medical College, Junagadh, 2Dr.
Mukund Dhokiya, Consultant Pathologist, SRL Diagnostics, Junagadh, Gujarat,
India.
Corresponding Author:
Dr. Mukund Dhokiya, Consultant
Pathologist, SRL Diagnostics, Junagadh, Gujarat, India, E-mail: dr.bhumipadia@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:
Male infertility has a significant
contribution in cases of infertility. Different habits among males i.e.
smoking, tobacco chewing and alcohol intake have found adverse influence on
sperm count and sperm motility. The mechanisms according to which tobacco
affects spermatozoa are poorly understood. Some of the studies focused on the
relation between cigarette smoking and the principal semen analysis, variable
such as concentration, Morphology and Motility. In this study, we compared the
sperm parameters-concentration and motility between tobacco consumers and
tobacco non-consumers. Objectives: To
identify the role of smoking and tobacco chewing in decreasing sperm count and
motility. Methods: Total 100 semen samples from the cases of infertility
reported at GMERS Medical College & Hospital were taken in this study. The
results of tobacco chewers and smokers were studied and compared according to
WHO guidelines, to that of tobacco non-consumers. Results: Out of 100
samples 59 showed decreased sperm count of which 41 men were tobacco consumers.
44 out of 100 samples showed decreased progressive motility, of which 29 men
were tobacco consumers. Conclusion: Tobacco consumption either as smoking or tobacco chewing have a
role in deteriorating the sperm quality and therefore in infertility of the
male partners.
Key words: Semen, Tobacco, Sperm count, Sperm motility
Author Corrected: 16th March 2019 Accepted for Publication: 20th March 2019
Introduction
According to WHO infertility is “a disease of the
reproductive system defined by the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy
after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse”. Male
infertility has a significant contribution in cases of infertility. Besides
general physical status, genetics, hormones and accompanying illnesses, routine
semen examination remains the principle index of male fertility evaluation.
Modern lifestyle and urbanization have been implicated as the factors
responsible for male infertility. Tobacco contains nicotine. It is accepted
that nicotine and its metabolite cotinine may lead to poor semen function and
resultant infertility [1]. Studies have examined the effects of tobacco
consumption either in the form of chewing or smoking, on human seminal quality.
It is likely that smoking adversely affects male reproductive health [2]. Semen
analysis, at the same time being a very simple and fundamental test, remains
the key investigation to study their impact in cases of male infertility. As
the cases of infertility are increasing there is a need to study its causative
factors and take measures to curb the same. So this study is conducted to
assess the effect of tobacco-one of the causative factor associated with male
infertility on semen quality with the help of seminal analysis. This article is
published to study the association between tobacco and deteriorating sperm
concentration and motility so that necessary steps can be taken to improve
fertility rates by decreasing one of the causative factors of
infertility-tobacco.
Materials and Methods
Place and type of study- It is a retrospective study
carried out in Department of Pathology- Central
laboratory, GMERS Medical College & Hospital, Junagadh, Gujarat from
January 2018 to December 2018.
Sampling method- Semen samples were
collected by masturbation in a sterile container or in semen collecting condom
after abstinence of 2 to 7 days, allowed to liquefy and analyzed immediately
thereafter, primarily for sperm count and motility.
Sample collection- Semen samples were
collected by masturbation in a sterile container after abstinence of 2 to 7
days. Immediately after ejaculation into the collection vessel, semen is
typically a semisolid coagulated mass. Within a few minutes at room
temperature, the semen usually begins to liquefy (become thinner), at which
time a heterogeneous mixture of lumps will be seen in the fluid. As
liquefaction continues, the semen becomes more homogeneous and quite watery,
and in the final stages only small areas of coagulation remain. The complete
sample usually liquefies within 15 minutes at room temperature, although rarely
it may take up to 60 minutes or more allowed to liquefy and analyzed
immediately thereafter, primarily for sperm count and motility [3]. Examination
was done via light microscopy of the wet preparation after proper liquefaction
of the semen sample and results were compared to the WHO standards [4].
Motility was assessed by evaluating 200 sperms per sample using the sperm
progression rating according to WHO criteria as follows:
A, Rapid forward progressive motility;
B, Slow or sluggish progressive motility;
C, Non-progressive motility;
D, Immobility.
WHO criteria for normal semen were
taken as reference value [4]
Liquefaction time |
Complete in 60min |
Volume |
1.5ml |
Color |
Opalescent white |
pH |
>7.1 |
Concentration (ml) |
15 million |
Progressive motility |
32% |
Vitality |
58% |
Morphology |
4% |
Leukocytes (ml) |
< 1 million |
Mar test |
<50% sperm with bound particles |
Inclusion
criteria- Total 100 cases of clinically diagnosed
infertility, reported at GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Junagadh in the
year 2018 were included in this study. The age group of cases was 22 – 45
years. Participants were questioned regarding their careers, smoking and
tobacco chewing habits, and medical and family histories. Study group were
compared for two characteristics one is for number of sperm count and other is
for progressive motility. For normal comparison WHO criteria [4] were taken
into consideration. Those who had smoked or chewed tobacco for ≥12 months were
considered chronic smokers or tobacco chewers respectively i.e. chronically
addicted.
Exclusion criteria- Previous
disease or surgery associated with reproductive function (including varicocele,
cryptorchidism, epididymitis, mumps, azoospermia); vasectomy and vasectomy
reversal.
Statistical
methods- The data was processed with simple
statistical analysis and p value was calculated. P-value < 0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Ethical consideration
and permission- The necessary approval to conduct
this study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) of the
college before starting the study.
In
the present study no any scoring system or any surgical procedure were used.
Results
The
results of this study are tabulated as follows:
Table
1 shows that out of 100 samples studied 59 showed decreased sperm count, of
which 41 were addicted to either smoking or tobacco, 26 were chronic smokers,
36 chronic tobacco chewers, of them 21 smoked and chewed both, and 18 men were
free of addiction.
Table-1: Distribution according to
sperm count
Relation of sperm count and tobacco addiction |
Low sperm count |
Normal sperm count |
Total |
Chronically Addicted |
41 |
14 |
55 |
Free of Addiction |
18 |
27 |
45 |
Total |
59 |
41 |
100 |
Table
2 reveals that 44 samples showed decreased progressive motility of the sperm,
of which 29 were addicted to either smoking or tobacco chewing in 100 tested
samples.
Table-2: Distribution according to
sperm motility
Relation of sperm motility and tobacco addiction |
Low sperm motility |
Normal sperm motility |
Total |
Chronically Addicted |
29 |
26 |
55 |
Free of Addiction |
15 |
30 |
45 |
Total |
44 |
56 |
100 |
The
p value in our study was 0.005. This value is less than 0.05 which means there
is a negative correlation between sperm count and sperm motility and tobacco
addiction and the result obtained is statistically significant. Hence it is
obtained in the result that tobacco addiction deteriorates semen quality by
decreasing sperm quality and motility.
Discussion
Patterns
of male fertility vary greatly among regions and even within regions. A
combination of social habits e.g. cigarette smoking, environmental conditions
and genetics are suspected to contribute to this variation [5]. According to
the World Health Organization (2002), approximately one-third of the world’s
male adult population (above 15 years of age) smokes. The combustion of tobacco
yields about 4000 chemical compounds, some of which are deadly toxic. Given
that cigarette smoke contains more than 30 compounds known to be mutagens, or
carcinogens such as" radioactive polonium, benzo (a) pyrine, dimethylbenz
(a) anthracene, dimethylnitrosamine, naphthalene, and methylnapthalene"
which have a direct deleterious effects on humanembryos and female and male
germ cells are probable (Zenzes, 2000) [6].
There
are many toxic substances in cigarettes. Among them is cadmium, which has been
proven experimentally to disrupt spermatogenesis and decrease sperm
concentration in smokers [7]. Tobacco smoking was also associated with a
significantly reduced level of zinc in seminal plasma, which is thought to be
one of the important factors that affect sperm motility [8]. Other harmful
substances associated with smoking are alkaloids, nitrosamines, and cotinine,
which produce reactive oxygen species like free radicals and peroxides. These
species attack the integrity of DNA in the sperm nucleus by causing base
modification, DNA strand breaks, and chromatin packing. The result is DNA
fragmentation that can increase the sperm abnormal forms in smokers [9].
Nicotine has been shown to increase the free radicals in the sperm. At the same time it also increases the susceptibility of the sperm to free radicals. It has been emphasized that human spermatozoa are particularly susceptible to oxidative stress-induced damage by reactive oxygen species (ROS) because their plasma membranes are rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids [10]. The ROS in tobacco smoking induce lipid peroxidation of the sperm plasma membrane; this is considered to be the key mechanism in inducing sperm damage that leads to decreased sperm viability, sperm concentration, sperm motility, and increased morphology defects [11,12].
In
present study a significant difference (p=0.005) is seen in addicted and non-
addicted in terms of semen quality this means tobacco addiction has significant
negative relation with sperm count as well as motility in adult males and thus
increasing the chances of male infertility. The present result showed that the
majority of cases were tobacco chewers.
The
semen parameters (e.g. density, total sperm counts, motility, viability and
normal morphology) of all cases were significantly poorer than that of the
controls in a study by Chia et al (2000) [13].
Wong
et al (2000) evaluated the impact of cigarette smoking on male factor
subfertility and the semen parameters of sperm count, motility, and morphology
by questionnaire and determination of the cotinine concentrations in blood and
seminal plasma of fertile and sub fertile males [14].
In
a cohort study Künzle et al. (2003) observed that cigarette smoking was
associated with a significant decrease in sperm density (−15.3%), total sperm
count (−17.5%), total number of motile sperm (−16.6%), and citrate
concentration (−22.4%) [15].
Smokers had significantly less spermatozoa with
motility grade B (9.37% versus 11.9%, P<0.05) than nonsmokers infertile men
in a prospective study Taszarek-H et al. (2005) [16].
A significant deleterious effects of tobacco smoking
on semen volume and sperm concentration, motility, and abnormal forms. The
correlation analysis placed special emphasis on the negative impact of smoking
on sperm motility in a study conducted by Hussein et al (2011) [17].
In 1985, Kulikausk as et al. found that smokers had a
significantly decreased spermatozoa count and motility when compared with
nonsmokers, but they found no significant difference in abnormal sperm
morphology [18].
A study by Said et al. (2005) concludes that tobacco
chewing is strongly associated with a decrease in sperm quality and to a lesser
extent with oligoas the nozoospermia or azoospermia [19].
In
a retrospective comparative study Coelho et al. (2009) analyzed the effects of
cigarette consumption on semen parameters of 327 men in Portugal. The semen
parameters were first compared between smokers and nonsmokers and then a heavy
smokers/light smoker’s analysis took place. A total of 135 (41%) were smokers
and 55 (40.7%) were heavy smokers. The demographic characteristics were similar
between groups. The tobacco use was associated with an increased incidence of
oligo/azoospermia, without difference in the other semen parameters. It was
also noted a negative correlation between heavy smoking habits and semen volume
abnormalities [20].
The
results of this study are in agreement with that found by Collodel et al (2009)
who demonstrated that the sperm motility, sperm concentration, and fertility
index decreased and the percentage of sperm pathologic features increased as
the number of cigarettes smoked daily increased [21].
According
to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2009), sperm from chronic
smokers were 75 % less fertile than sperm from nonsmokers [22].
A
significant difference is seen in tobacco addicted and non-addicted male in
terms of semen quality in a study by Choksi T et al (2015) [23].
All
the above studies are consistent with our study.
Conclusion
From our study we concluded thatTobacco
addiction has significant negative relation with sperm count as well as
motility in adult males and thus increasing the chances of male infertility.
Contribution by
different authors- In this manuscript,
study was done by Dr. Bhumi and manuscript prepared by Dr. Mukund.
What this
study adds to existing knowledge? From our study we came to know that tobacco addiction has significant
effect on deteriorating semen quality and thus we can spread awareness on
quitting tobacco addiction to improve semen quality and decrease the rate of
male infertility so that there is overall decline in cases of infertility which
is on rise in present day world.
References
How to cite this article?
Padia B, Dhokiya M. A study on effect of tobacco on semen quality. Trop J Path Micro 2019;5(3):115-119.doi:10.17511/ jopm. 2019.i3.01.