Cytopathological study of salivary gland
lesions in rural population: Use of the Milan system for reporting
Mahammadtalha B.1, Swami S.Y.2
1Dr. Bagwan Mahammadtalha,
Post Graduate Student, 2Dr. Sunil Y. Swami; Associate Professor, both autours are affiliated with Department of Pathology, S.R.T.R. Government Medical
College, Ambajogai, Maharastra, India.
Corresponding Author: Dr. Sunil Y. Swami, Bhagwanbaba Chowk, Gitta-Road, Shepwadi, Taluka:
Ambajogai, District-Beed, Maharastra, India. E-mail: drsys02@gmail.com.
Abstract
Introduction: Salivary gland lesions are superficial
lesions & seek attention of patient easily. These lesions vary from
non-neoplastic to neoplastic ones and from benign to malignant. Impact of
changing habits of people may be reflected in spectrum of oral health &
lesions of salivary glands. Objectives
and Method: Present study includes the spectrum of distribution of various
lesions of salivary glands in the patients visiting tertiary care rural
hospital. In the present study, the Milan system was used for reporting
salivary gland cytopathology in 150 cases. Results:
FNAC proved to be a safe and effective modality in diagnosis and planning
management of patients with salivary gland lesionsin the rural based
population. Conclusion: Milan system was found characteristically
significant for cytopathological diagnosis of SGLs.
Key words: Milan system, Cytopathology, Salivary gland, Rural
population
Author Corrected: 18th February 2019 Accepted for Publication: 22nd February 2019
Introduction
Salivary
gland diseases usually present as a swelling of the affected gland. FNAC (Fine
needle aspiration cytology) is being increasingly used in the diagnosis of the
salivary gland swellings [1]. Salivary gland lesions comprise 2-6.5% of all
head and neck neoplasms in adults. The common presentation is an enlarged mass
which is usually accessible for FNAC. Salivary gland tumors are not common;
moreover, the associated histopathology of these tumors is extremely varied and
complex due to the presence of epithelial and non-epithelial neoplasms,
lymphomas, metastatic tumors and non-neoplastic lesions in the salivary glands
[2]. The rapidity for diagnosis, low morbidity and a high diagnostic accuracy
makes FNAC a popular method for evaluating the salivary gland neoplasms before
any surgical intervention [3].
Material and Methods
This
study included 150patients presented with salivary gland swellings.
Type of study: Prospective and observational study.
Inclusion criteria: All cases of salivary gland lesions were
included in the present study.
Exclusion criteria: Patients on conservative treatment and those
referred to other hospitals were excluded from the study.
Detail clinical
history was taken, and local examination followed by systemic examination was
done in all patients. After taking consent, FNAC was done using 21-23-gauge
needle attached to a 10 ml syringe and smears were prepared. Smears were wet
fixed in 95% ethyl alcohol at least for 30 minutes and Papanicolaou (Pap)
staining was done. Air dried smears were stained with May-Grunwald Giemsa (MGG)
stain. Stained smears were mounted with DPX (dextrene polystyrene xylene) and
examined under the light microscope.
Results
In
the present study, 150 cases of SGLs (Salivary gland lesions) were studied in
rural based population by using the Milan System of reporting cytology.
Out of 150 cases, maximum lesions i.e.84 (56%) were
observed in submandibular salivary gland followed by 53 (35.33%) and 09 (06%)
lesions in parotid and sublingual salivary glands respectively. 4 lesions (2.67
%) were observed in minor salivary glands.
Table-1: Frequency distribution pattern in
SGLs:
Category |
Cyto-diagnosis: |
Male |
Female |
Total |
% |
|
I |
Non- Diagnostic. |
11 |
05 |
16 |
10.67 |
|
II |
Non- Neoplastic. |
32 |
38 |
70 |
46.67 |
|
III |
AUS. |
05 |
04 |
09 |
06.00 |
|
IV |
Neoplasm: |
A. Benign: |
18 |
17 |
35 |
23.33 |
B. SUMP: |
02 |
00 |
02 |
01.33 |
||
V |
SM: |
03 |
03 |
06 |
04.00 |
|
VI |
Malignant: |
08 |
04 |
12 |
08.00 |
|
Total |
79 |
71 |
150 |
100 |
Out of 150 cases, maximum lesions i.e. 70 (46%)
were non-neoplastic followed by 37 (24.66%) of neoplastic lesions &16
(10.67%) cases were non-diagnostic.
Non-neoplastic
lesions included inflammatory, metaplastic and reactive lesions like acute,
chronic & granulomatous sialadenitis, sialoadenosis & reactive
lymphadenitis. About 9 (06%) cases of AUS [Atypia of undetermined significance]
were observed which was within the frequency of Milan’s system of
classification i.e. 10%.
Out of
37 cases of neoplastic lesions, 35 (23.33%) cases were of benign subcategory
while 02 (01.33%) cases were of SUMP [Salivary gland neoplasm of Uncertain
Malignant Potential]. 6 (04%) cases were observed in category of suspicious of
malignancy [SM]. 12 (08%) cases were observed as malignant lesions.
In
our study, the age group of the patients ranged from 02 to 90 years with the
mean age of 39.7 years. 79 cases were males and 71 cases were females with M: F
ratio of 1.11:1.
Non-neoplastic
lesions [Category II] were commonly seen in the age group of 21 -30 years while
neoplastic lesions [Category IV] were commonly seen in the age group of 20 - 60
years. Malignant lesions and lesions with suspicious of malignancy [Category V
&VI] were commonly seen in the age group of 50 -70 years.
Table-2: Cytopathological categories of
salivary gland lesions
SGLs |
M |
F |
Total |
% |
Non-diagnostic samples |
11 |
05 |
16 |
10.67 |
Sialoadenosis |
01 |
00 |
01 |
0.67 |
Acute sialadenitis |
10 |
06 |
16 |
10.67 |
Chronic sialadenitis |
05 |
03 |
08 |
05.34 |
Granulomatous
sialadenitis |
01 |
00 |
01 |
1.67 |
Lymphadenitis [Acute,
reactive, chronic, granulomatous] |
14 |
29 |
43 |
28.67 |
Non-mucinous cysts |
00 |
01 |
01 |
00.67 |
AUS. |
05 |
04 |
09 |
06.00 |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
17 |
15 |
32 |
21.34 |
Basal cell adenoma[BCA] |
01 |
02 |
03 |
02.00 |
SUMP |
02 |
00 |
02 |
01.33 |
Other suspicious for
malignancies |
03 |
03 |
06 |
04.00 |
Mucoepidermoid
carcinoma[MEC] |
02 |
00 |
02 |
01.33 |
Lymphomas |
04 |
02 |
06 |
04.00 |
Metastasis |
02 |
02 |
04 |
02.67 |
Total |
79 |
71 |
150 |
100.00 |
Out of 150 cases, 16 cases (10.67%) were
non-diagnostic, 16 (10.67%) cases were of acute sialadenitis, 08 (5.34%) cases
were of chronic sialadenitis, 43 cases (28.67%) of lymphadenitis including
acute, chronic, granulomatous and tuberculous lymphadenitis, 32 (21.34%) cases were
of PA, 3 (2%) cases were of BCA, 2 (1.33 %) cases were of high grade MEC, 6
(04%) cases each of suspicious or malignant lesions & lymphoma
respectively, 4 (2.67%) cases of secondaries from epithelial malignancies &
01(0.67%) case each of sialo-adenosis and non-mucinous cyst respectively.
Discussion
FNAC
has been well established role in the diagnosis of SGLs & it is a safe,
cost-efficient, minimally invasive procedure that helps the clinicians in the
formulation of further management [4,5]. However, at many times it becomes a
tedious job to diagnose accurately, mainly due to the similar microscopic
picture of normal salivary gland elements, heterogeneous nature of salivary
gland lesions, overlapping features between benign and malignant lesions,
presence of cystic components, and oncocytic metaplasia [6].
Aspirates
from SGLs in category I were reported as non-diagnostic only after processing
& examining all the material. Cases with mucinous cyst contents were
included in AUS category.
Table-3: Comparison
of distribution of SGLs:
Category |
Studies |
||||
Jaiswal P et al [7]. |
Viswanathan K et al [8]. |
Savant D et al [9]. |
Montezuma D et al [10]. |
Present study |
|
I |
3(4.91%) |
75(12%) |
18(9.2%) |
28(7.21%) |
16(10.67%) |
II |
15(24.59%) |
179(28.5%) |
4(2%) |
89(22.93%) |
70(46.67%) |
III |
1(1.64%) |
38(6.1%) |
12(6%) |
39(10.05%) |
9(6%) |
IV-A |
28(45.90%) |
197(31.4%) |
118(59.2%) |
156(40.21%) |
35(23.33%) |
IV-B |
1(1.64%) |
62(9.9%) |
22(11%) |
55(14.18%) |
2(1.33%) |
V |
1(1.64%) |
17(2.7%) |
3(1.5%) |
7(1.80%) |
6(4%) |
VI |
13(21.31%) |
59(9.4%) |
22(11%) |
14(3.60%) |
12(8%) |
Total |
61(100%) |
627(100%) |
199(100%) |
388(100%) |
150(100%) |
In the present study, non-diagnosticcases [I]
were 16 (10.67%) which is comparable with the study done by Viswanathan K et al
[8] & Savant D et al [9].
This
comprised of smears with less than 60 lesional cells, poorly prepared slides
with artifacts [Fig:1A], slides with normal salivary gland elements in
unilateral swellings, non-mucinous cyst contents showing cyst fluid only or
histiocytes [Fig. 1B].
Aspirates
lacking clear cytomorphologic evidences of neoplastic process were reported as
category II: non-neoplastic. In our study, non-neoplastic SGLs included were
acute sialadenitis [Fig:1 C], chronic sialadenitis [Fig:1D], granulomatous/
tuberculous sialadenitis [Fig: 2A, B, C], sialoadenosis, sialolithiasis and
reactive lymph node hyperplasia’s. Being this study done in rural population,
it seems that non-neoplastic lesions i.e. 70(46.67%) were observed more as
compared to other studies.
Mucinous
cyst lesions [Fig: 2D], reactive atypia [Fig: 3A] observed in the smears were
included in AUS / category III which was comparable i.e.09 (06%) to the studies
done by Viswanathan K et al [8] & Savant D et al [9].
Fig. 1A: Nondiagnostic [I]: Inadequate smear:
shows less than 60 cells in the background of hemorrhage [MGG: 5X]
Fig.1B:
Nondiagnostic [I]: Non-mucinous cyst: shows plenty of cyst macrophages [MGG:
40X].
Fig.1C:
Non-neoplastic [II]: Acute sialadenitis: shows occasional epithelial cells
admixed with plenty of polymorphs. [PAP: 10X]
Fig.1D: Non-neoplastic
[II]: Chronic sialadenitis: shows acinar cells & lymphocytes in the
hemorrhagic background. [PAP: 10X]
Fig.2A: Non-Neoplastic [II]: Tuberculous
lymphadenitis: shows few inflammatory cells admixed with abundant caseous necrosis.
[PAP: 10X]
Fig.2B:
Non-neoplastic [II]: Tuberculous lymphadenitis: shows epitheloid cells &
foreign body giant cells. [MGG: 40X]
Fig.2C:
Non-neoplastic [II]: Tuberculous lymphadenitis: shows acid fast bacilli. [ZN
stain: 40X]
Fig.2D:
AUS [III]: Mucinous cyst: shows cyst macrophages (mucinophages) in the
background of abundant mucin. [MGG: 40X]
Fig.3A: AUS [III]: shows epithelial cells
admixed with occasional atypical cells with large hyperchromatic nuclei. [PAP:
40X]
Fig.
B: Neoplasm [IV: A]: PA shows epithelial cells & mesenchymal spindle cells
in the chondromyxoid ground substance. [PAP: 10X]
Fig.3C:
Neoplasm [IV: A]: Basal cell adenoma (Trabecular variant): shows multiple
hyaline stromal globules surrounded by bland epithelial or basal cells. [PAP:
40X]
Fig.3D:
Neoplasm [IV: B]: SUMP: Highly cellular PA with atypia: shows highly cellular,
matrix poor pleomorphic adenoma with atypia. [PAP: 40X]
The benign
neoplasms with no definite evidence of malignancywere reported in category IV
i.e. Neoplastic: A- Benign. 35 (23.33%)
cases including PA [Fig: 3B] and BCA [Fig: 3C] were observed in this study
which was comparable to study done by Viswanathan K et al [8].
Fig.4A: Suspicious for malignancy [V]: shows
groups of markedly atypical cells with hyperchromatic nuclei. [PAP: 40X]
Fig.
4B: Malignant [VI]: SCC: shows malignant squamous cells admixed with foreign
body giant cells. [PAP: 40X]
Fig.
4C: Malignant [VI]: NHL: shows monomorphic population of lymphoid cells [PAP:
40X]
In
the category IV/ Neoplastic: B: SUMP, two cases i.e. 2(1.33%) [Fig: 3D] with
high cellularity and or atypia with suspicious of malignant potential were
included which was comparable to previous study done by Jaiswal P et al [7].
6
(04%) cases [Fig: 4A] of SM were observed in our present study which showed
markedly atypical cells.12 (08%) cases of malignant SGLs were observed in our
study which included MEC, SCC [Fig: 4B], NHL[Fig:4C] and metastasis, which was
comparable to study done by Viswanathan K et al [8].
Table-4: Comparison of age wise distribution pattern in SGL:
Present study showed maximum cases in age
group of 31-40 years with a mean age of 39.7 years, which was comparable to
studies done by Kakoty S et al [11] &
Shafkat A et al [13].
Age Group (Years) |
Studies |
|||||||
Kakoty S. et al [11]. |
Dalve K. et al [12]. |
Shafkat A. et al [13]. |
Present study |
|||||
Cases |
% |
Cases |
% |
Cases |
% |
Cases |
% |
|
0-10 |
00 |
00 |
01 |
01.08 |
05 |
05 |
12 |
08.00 |
11-20 |
07 |
14 |
13 |
14.13 |
12 |
12 |
19 |
12.67 |
21-30 |
10 |
20 |
14 |
15.21 |
22 |
22 |
25 |
16.67 |
31-40 |
15 |
30 |
11 |
11.96 |
26 |
26 |
26 |
17.33 |
41-50 |
10 |
20 |
18 |
19.57 |
18 |
18 |
23 |
15.33 |
51-60 |
06 |
12 |
11 |
11.96 |
12 |
12 |
17 |
11.33 |
61-70 |
02 |
04 |
19 |
20.65 |
04 |
04 |
22 |
14.67 |
71-80 |
00 |
00 |
04 |
04.36 |
01 |
01 |
04 |
02.67 |
81-90 |
00 |
00 |
01 |
01.08 |
00 |
00 |
02 |
01.33 |
Total |
50 |
100 |
92 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
150 |
100 |
Table 5: Comparison of sex wise distribution pattern in SGLs:
Studies |
M |
F |
M:F |
|||
Jain C.14 |
42 (52.5%) |
38 (47.5%) |
1.10: 1 |
|||
Gandhi SH et al.15 |
53 (58.8%) |
37(41.1%) |
1.43: 1 |
|||
Singh Nanda et al.16 |
90 (70.8%) |
37(29.1%) |
2.40: 1 |
|||
Present
study |
79
(53%) |
71
(47%) |
1.11:
1 |
|||
In the present study of 150 salivary gland lesions,
male preponderance was observed with male to female ratio of 1.1: 1, which was
comparable to studies done by Jain C [14] and Gandhi SH. et al [15].
Table-6: Comparison of site wise distribution
pattern in SGLs:
Studies/ Sites |
Parotid |
Submandibular |
Sublingual |
Minor |
Total |
Jain C [14] |
38 (54.28%) |
31 (44.28%) |
|
1(1.42%) |
70 |
Singh Net al [16] |
65 (51.1%) |
47 (37%) |
6 (4.7%) |
9(7%) |
127 |
Singh Aet al [17] |
76(79.16%) |
18 (18.75%) |
|
2(2.8%) |
96 |
Ashraf Aet al [18] |
68 (68%) |
30 (30%) |
|
2(2%) |
100 |
Vaidya Set al [19] |
27 (46.5%) |
27 (46.5%) |
1 (1.7%) |
3(5.2%) |
58 |
Present study |
53
(35.33%) |
83
(56%) |
9
(6%) |
4
(2.67%) |
150 |
In the present study of 150 cases of SGL’s,submandibular
gland was most commonly affected i.e.in 83 (56%) cases followed by parotid gland
53 (35.33%) cases and sublingual salivary gland 9 (6%) cases.Minor salivary
glands were affected in 4 (2.67%) cases which was comparable to study done by
Singh A et al [17]& Ashraf A et al [18].
Benign tumors were more common in the age group of 21- 60 year and
malignant tumors were more common in the age group of 61-80 years which was
comparable to the study done by Joshi A
et al [20].
Conclusion
150
cases of SGLs were studied in rural based population by using the Milan system
of reporting cytopathology.Submandibular salivary gland was most commonly
affected followed by parotid gland, minor salivary glands and sublingual glandrespectively.
Age range in our study was from 2- 90 years with mean age 39.7
years. Male
preponderance was observed with M: F of 1.11: 1.Non-neoplastic lesions were
more common than neoplastic SGL’s. Benign tumors were more common in the age
group 21-40 years while malignant tumors were more common in the age group of
61-80years.PA was the most common benign tumor and MEC was the most common
primary malignant tumor.
Role of
FNAC, its diagnostic utility in the rural based population combined with the
use of Milan System of reporting cytopathology in SGLs was found
characteristically significant for cytological diagnosis.
Both
the authors had equally contributed regarding concept, design, literature
search, data analysis and preparation of this manuscript. No prior publication,
support and conflict of interest.
References
How to cite this article?
Mahammadtalha B, Swami S.Y. Cytopathological study of salivary gland lesions in rural population: Use of the Milan system for reporting. Trop J Path Micro 2019;5(2):100-106.doi:10.17511/ jopm. 2019.i2.09.