Prevalence of malaria among blood donors in blood bank, Jhalawar
Hospital & Medical College Society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan
Manish Kumar1, Shakyawal B.2,
Madan Y.3
1Dr. Manish Kumar, Assistant Professor, 2Dr.
Brajendra Shakyawal, Assistant Professor, 3Dr. Yogendra Madan,
Assistant Professor, all authors are affiliated with Department of Pathology, Jhalawar
Medical College, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India.
Corresponding
Author: Dr.
Brajendra Shakyawal, in front of Bijasanmatapark, Keshavpura, Sector-4, Kota,
Rajasthan. E-mail: bshakyawal@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Transfusion Transmitted
Malaria (TTM) is the great
concern in endemic countries. Transmission of malaria by blood transfusion was
one of the first recorded incidents of transfusion transmitted infection. The
drugs and cosmetic act in India mandates the testing of all blood donations for
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) hepatitis
B surface antigen (HbsAg), hepatitis C virus(HCV), malaria and syphilis. The
present study aims to determine the prevalence of malarial among voluntary and
replacement blood donors in Blood Bank,
Jhalawar Hospital & Medical college society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Material
and Methods: A retrospective review of donors record covering the
period between Jan 2017 to Dec 2017 at Blood Bank, Jhalawar Hospital &
Medical college society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India. The blood samples were
then obtained by standard procedures of venepuncture. Malarial parasites were
screened by microscopy (peripheral blood smear) and rapid Antigen card
detection in blood bank. The study detected the presence of malaria parasites
in donated blood units. Results: 5 out of 16495 donor
population were positive(Prevalence 0.03%) on Immunochromatographic rapid
diagnostic test for malarial antigen detection (Rapid Antigen Card Test).
Conclusion:
Blood donors in Blood Bank, Jhalawar Hospital & Medical college
society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan, India have a 0.03% prevalence and voluntary
donations are safer as compared to replacement donation. By strict donor
selection, proper donor testing and post testing counselling,the rate of TTM
can be further minimized.
Keywords: TTM, Blood
Donors, Peripheral blood smear,
Rapid Antigen Card Test, Malaria, Microscopy
Author Corrected: 20th February 2019 Accepted for Publication: 26th February 2019
Introduction
Blood donation is
the most important and essential part of blood transfusion services, usually
donated voluntarily or in the form of replacement. Millions of lives are saved
each year through blood transfusions, who have lost large volumes of blood from
serious accidents, major Surgical Operation, Cancer patients requiring therapy, women with haemorrhage at childbirth, patients
of hereditary disorders like Haemophilia and Thalassaemia, severe burn victims
as well as for individuals who have symptomatic anemia from medical or
hematologic conditions or cancers.
Blood
transfusion carries the risk of transmitting major infections such as
hepatitis, HIV, syphilis, and malaria. In minority cases, viral infections such
as cytomegalovirus, herpes virus, and Epstein–Barr virus along with
toxoplasmosis and brucellosis may be transmitted [1]. Therefore Blood banks are
obligated to provide adequate and safe blood to the community. In India, it is mandatory to test every unit
of blood collected for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, syphilis and malaria[2].
The donated blood was discarded whenever the pilot donor sample was found
positive for any TTI. Transmission of malaria by blood transfusion was one of
the first recorded incidents of transfusion transmitted infection[3].Testing of blood for malarial
parasite is mandatory as per the drugs and cosmetic act part X11 B of Schedule
F.
Although
malaria transmission occurs principally through mosquito bites, transfusion-transmitted
malaria (TTM) is an accidental Plasmodium infection caused by the transfusion of whole
blood or a blood component from a malaria infected donor to a recipient,
described for the first time by Woolsey in 1911.The frequency of transfusion
transmitted malaria varies from 0.2 per million cases fornon-endemic countries
to 50 or more cases per million in endemic areas [4].
The microscopic detection of blood though
considered the gold standard for malaria diagnosis for decades, it is quite
labor intensive and require adequate technical skill and man power. This had
spurred the development of other microscopic malarial andrapid detection test
based on the detection of malarial parasite antigen in the whole blood[5].
Donors who are implicated as the source of
transfusion transmitted malaria cases typically have very low level of
parasitemia undetectable even on several thick films [6].
The parasites load in infected donors may be
very low; therefore, no clinical symptoms may be observed andPlasmodium species
may live in the donors for years.This study was undertaken to determinethe
prevalence of malaria among voluntary and replacement blood donors.
Material & Methods
Type of study:Retrospective
study
Place of study:BloodBank,Jhalawar hospital & Medical college society,Jhalawar,
Rajasthancovering the period between Jan 2017 to Dec 2017.
Sampling Methods: All records
including TTI records, donor registers, completely filled donor forms, which included
the type of donation (voluntary/replacement), the patient’s details,
pre-donation questionnaire, counselling details and medical examination
findings available for each case were analysed. The samples from all blood
donations were screened for HIV 1-2, HBsAg, HCV, syphilis and malaria. We
at our blood bank, have been routinely screening all donated units of blood for
malaria using RDT, based on immunochromatographic methods detecting antigens,
histidine-rich protein 2 (HRP2-P. falciparum), and p-lactate
dehydrogenase (pLDH-P. vivax). Field stained thick and thin smears were
madeof all positive cases to corroborate the results of RDT.
Statistical
Methods: All Data were collected for malaria and analysed.
Result
Out of the 16495 blood donors, 5013(30.39%)
were voluntary donors and 11482(69.61%) were replacement donors. Maximum blood
donors were Rh positive. There was a higher rate of male blood donation than females.
Most of the donors were from age groups of 20–40 years. Thus indicating
more youngster population as donors
Table-1: VariousTTI among total blood donors
Transfusion transmitted infections(TTI) |
Voluntary donors(5013) |
Replacement donors(11486) |
Totaldonors(16495) |
Malaria |
0 |
5 |
5 |
HIV |
03 |
14 |
17 |
Hepatitis B |
109 |
202 |
311 |
Hepatitis C |
03 |
31 |
34 |
Syphilis |
0 |
4 |
4 |
Table-2: Percentage of various infections in total TTI
Transfusion transmitted infections |
% of Total TTI |
Malaria |
1.34% |
HIV |
4.58% |
Hepatitis B |
83.82% |
Hepatitis C |
9.16% |
Syphilis |
1.078% |
Totally,
2.25% (n = 371) bags were seropositive for transfusion transmitted
infections (TTI) out of 16495 donors. Prevalence
of Hepatitis B is highest 1.88% (311 donors) followed by infected with HCV
0.20% (34 donors), HIV 0.10% (17 donors), malaria 0.03% (5 donors) and syhlilis
0.024% (4 donors) (Table 1). Hepatitis B was the leading cause among the TTI
83.82% followed HCV 9.16% and HIV 4.58% (Table 2).5 out of 16495 donor
population were positive on Immuno chromatographic rapid diagnostic test for
malarial antigen detection. In our study all 5 malaria positive donors were
replacement donor.
Discussion
Malaria, one of
the most important parasitic diseases inunder-developed countries, is a serious
transfusion transmitted infection ranked after viral hepatitis and HIV.
The extensive use
of blood and its products, and close contacts of human beings, enhanced the
risk of transfusion transmitted malaria. Plasmodium species can be
transmittedby transfusion of cellular components in labile blood products, and
unlikely by frozen/thawed therapeutic plasma. All Plasmodium species are able to
survive in stored blood, even if frozen, and retain their viability for at
least 1 week, possibly well over 10 days depending on the conditions
of storage; in fact, microscopically detectable malaria parasites were present
even after 28 days of storage at 4°C although a decrease of infectivity
after 2 weeks was observed [6,7,8]. Asymptomatic carriers
have potential role as the source of infection for Anopheles vectors as well as
blood recipient. Presence
of Plasmodium falciparum inblood may lead to fatalities when the blood
is transfused especially in the children under 5 years, pregnant women, and
accident victims etc [6]. A recent international forum showed that in Europe, as
well as the USA, prevention of transfusion associated protozoa infections depend
mainly on selection of donors using questionnaires. A donor is rejected for 3 years
after their last visit to the endemicarea [9]. Persons from the non endemic
areas, who visited the malaria endemic area, are rejected for 4-12 months [10].
Over the last decade only a few cases of transfusiontransmitted malaria were
reported in variouscountries. There is evidencethat ABO histocompatibility of
blood groupis not correlated to the incidence ofmalaria [9], but it has been
linked as a coreceptor in parasite and vascularcytoadherence with higher
rosette rates among non group O compared to group Oerythrocytes [11]. Donors
who are implicated asthe source of transfusion transmitted malariacases
typically have very low level ofparasitemia undetectable even on several thickfilms
[12]. Several studies have demonstrated an overall high sensitivity of
Histidine Rich Protein (HRP 2) based diagnostic assays and their potential
clinical utility for the diagnosis of malaria in symptomatic patients [13,14,15].
In our study there
are only 5 cases(all cases found in replacement donors) found positive on Rapid
detection test by immunochromatography
(0.03% prevalence rate). which was comparable with study conducted by Bahadur et al (prevalence 0.03%
) [5], Fernandes H et al (prevalence 0.01%)[16], Pallavi et al were unable to
find a single case of malaria [17], Yadav et al were unable to find a single
case of malaria [18], Negi et al (prevalence 0.002%) [19], Rajesh Kumar et al (prevalence
0.006%) [20], Fulzele et al (prevalence0.0177%)[21] and Akanksha Rawat et al (prevalence rate 0.06%)[22]. Authors Ali MSM
et al[23], Okocha EC et al[24], Owusu-Ofori Alex K et al[25] found very high
prevalence of 6-55% in their studies may be due to high endemic area.
Table-3: Comparison-malaria
prevalence of various studies with present study
S.N. |
Study |
Malaria positivity (%) |
1 |
Bahadur et al,LadyHarding MC, Delhi [5] |
0.03% |
2 |
Fernandes H et al,Mangalore (India)[16] |
0.01% |
3 |
Pallavi et al,Mysore[17] |
0.00% |
4 |
Yadav et al, Central India [18] |
0.00% |
5 |
Negi et al,Uttarakhand [19] |
0.002% |
6 |
Rajesh kumar et
al, Ludhiana [20] |
0.006% |
7 |
Fulzele et al,Mumbai [21] |
0.0177% |
8 |
Akanksha Rawat
et al,Delhi [22] |
0.06% |
9 |
Ali MSM et al, Sudan [23] |
6.5% |
10 |
Okocha EC et al,Nigerian teaching hospital[24] |
30.2% |
11 |
Owusu-Ofori Alex K et al, Northern Nigeria[25] |
55% |
12 |
Present study |
0.03% |
The drugs and cosmetic act in Indiamandates
the testing for malaria but there is no definite guidelines onthe choice of the
test. Since apparentlyhealthy individuals those selected for blood donation may
have very low density and may be easily missed [26]. Donors who are considered
as the source of transfusion transmitted malaria cases, typically have very low
level of parasitemia. Which undetectable even on thick smears.
Malaria antibody screeningis not indicative
of active infection andresults in unnecessary high discarding of collected
blood units. Malaria antibody may persist up to several years after infection. PCR
test have limited availability. Also malaria immunoprophylaxis to all blood
recipients is also not feasible practically.
Post-transfusion
malaria may
cause severe clinical symptoms in the recipients, especially in those with no
previous exposure to malaria or in immuno-compromised patients due to other
coexisting diseases [27]. An important difference between the natural infection
and TTM is that the former undergoes an initial asymptomatic phase
(pre-erythrocytic) which allows the activation of innate immunity cells against
malaria parasites. Infected blood transfusions directly release malaria
parasites in the recipient’s bloodstream triggering the development of high
risk complications and potentially leading to a fatal outcome [28]. Delayed or
missed diagnosis of P. falciparum in particular increases the risk of
severe disease which may be fatal especially in non-immune individuals.
In case a patient is transfused with a
malaria positive blood, the patient can be given a curative regimen of
antimalarials, especially when the patient falls into the malaria vulnerable
group (children, pregnant women, immigrants from outside malarious regions).
Conclusion
Our study result showed that Blood donors in Blood Bank, Jhalawar Hospital & Medical College Society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan have low prevalence of malaria.
Voluntary donations are safer as compared to replacement donation.
Recommendations: Use
of rapid detection devices with peripheral smear screening of positive cases
(2) strict
donor selection, proper donor testing
and post testing counseling. (3) Voluntarily blood donations should be
encouraged so as to prevent blood donations from being made under emergency
situations because in such cases the likelihood of transfusing infected blood
will be higher.
Contribution from authors
·
Dr. Manish Kumar: Preparation of manuscript,
Data collection, Data compiling, literature review, final approval.
·
Dr. Brajendra Shakyawal:
Manuscript editing, literature review, final
approval
·
Dr. Yogendra Madan:
Literature review, Final approval
Funding: This research did not receive any specific
grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or nonprofit
organizations.
Ethical approval: The study was conducted after ethical approval
by the Institutional Ethics Committee.
References
How to cite this article?
Manish Kumar, Shakyawal B, Madan Y. Prevalence of malaria among blood donors in blood bank, Jhalawar Hospital & Medical College Society, Jhalawar, Rajasthan. Trop J Path Micro 2019;5(2):83-87.doi:10.17511/ jopm. 2019.i2.06.