Histomorphological
spectrum of endometrial lesion in women presenting with abnormal uterine
bleeding: A 3-year study at a tertiary care center
Sharma
R.1, Mishra P.2, Kumar N.3, Srivastava P.4
1Dr.
Ritu Sharma. Assistant Professor, 2Dr Poornima Mishra, Assistant Professor,3Dr. (Brig.)
Nikhilesh Kumar, Professor (Brig.) and Head;
all above authors are attached with Department of Pathology, 4Dr.
Prachi Srivastava, Assistant Professor, Department of Obs& Gynae, all authors are affiliated with T.S. Misra
Medical college and Hospital Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Corresponding
Author:Dr.
Poornima Mishra, Assistant Professor,TSM Medical College & Hospital,
Amausi, Lucknow, U.P. Email: histopath6@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) is the most common
presentation amongst the women of all age groups attending the gynecology Out
Patient Department. Histopathological evaluation of
the endometrial samples plays a significant role in the diagnosis of abnormal
uterine bleeding. Aim: To determine
the various histomorphological patterns of the endometrium in women presenting
with AUB.Material and Method: A retrospective analysis of 183 patients age
ranged from 15 to 71 years, presenting with AUB was done who underwent
endometrial sampling during a 3-year period from August 2015 to July 2018 in
Department of Pathology at T.S Misra Medical College and hospital. Detailed clinical history like age,
menstrual status including painful bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding,
periodicity & regularity of cycle were obtained from the case records. Patients
were categorized into reproductive age group, perimenopausal and postmenopausal.
Specimens were routinely processed and stained with Haematoxylin& Eosin
stain and microscopic morphological evaluation was done. Results: The most common age group affected is perimnopausal presenting withAUB
frequently seen in 41-50 years of age group (47.5%). The commonest
Histomorphological pattern in these patients was proliferative endometrium
(38.8%), secretory endometrium (16.3%), endometrial hyperplasia seen in 22
cases (12.0%), hormonal changes/Pill endometrium were seen in 6.0% of the cases
and least number cases were of endometrial carcinoma forming 1.1% of the total
cases taken in the study. Conclusion: In our study patients with AUB show variable pathology on
endometrial biopsy as milder as inflammatory cause to as notorious as malignancy.
Key words:Endometrium,
Postmenopausal, Malignancy,Abnormal uterine bleeding
Author Corrected: 20th November 2018 Accepted for Publication: 27th November 2018
Introduction
Abnormal
uterine bleeding (AUB) is the most common presentation amongst the women of all
age groups attending the Gynecology Out Patient Department. AUBis the term used
to describe any departure from normal menstruation or from a normal menstrual
cycle pattern. The key characteristics are regularity, frequency, heaviness of
flow and duration of flow [1]. Menstrual bleeding is considered abnormal when
the pattern is irregular of prolonged duration (i.e>20 days) in individual
cycle lengths over a period of 1 year or heavy menstrual bleeding. Recently,
the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics working group on
menstrual disorder has developed a classification system (PALM-COEIN) for
causes of the AUB in non-gravid women of reproductive age. There are nine main
categories, which are arranged according to the acronym PALM-COEIN: Polyp;
adenomyosis; leiomyoma; malignancy and hyperplasia; coagulopathy; ovulatory
dysfunction; endometritis; iatrogenic; and not yet classified [2]. Two types of causes including functional causes
like normal cyclical endometrium, abnormal physiological changes of endometrium
(atrophic endometrium, weakly proliferative and disordered proliferative
endometrium) and organic lesions like chronic endometritis, endometrial
hyperplasia, endometrial polyp, carcinomas and pregnancy related complications
[2]. In reproductive age group heavy menstrual bleeding accounts for 30% of
total DUB cases [3], while postmenopausal bleeding accounts for 5% of all
gynaecological visits. Histopathological examination of endometrial sample is
used for the diagnosis of majority of lesions. Endometrial biopsy and curettage
are chief sampling methods [4].
Materials
and Methods
A retrospective study was undertaken which included
183 endometrial samples with a clinical diagnosis of AUB. The study was carried
out in the Department of pathology, T.S. Misra Medical College & Hospital
Lucknow (U.P.), India, over a period of 3 years from August 2015 to July 2018.
Inclusion
Criteria: Patients with isolated endometrial
causes of abnormal uterine bleeding were included for study. Endometrial
samples (Biopsy or Dilation & Curettage) obtained from those patients were
studied.
Exclusion
Criteria: Patients presenting with AUB due to
cervical or vaginal pathology and haemostatic disorders were excluded from the
study.
Detailed
clinical history like age, menstrual status including painful bleeding, heavy menstrual bleeding, periodicity &
regularity of cycle were obtained from the case records. Relevant findings of
general and systemic examination were recorded. Endometrial samples were
obtained from dilatation and curettage or endometrial biopsy. Specimens were
received in 10% formalin. Gross morphology of these tissue samples was studied.
These were studied grossly and were processed in automated tissue processor.
Five-micron thick paraffin embedded serial sections were taken and stained by
Haematoxylin and Eosin stain. Special stains like Zeil- Neelson stain and
Periodic Acid Schiff stain were done as per the case requirement. Detailed
microscopic examination was done in each case. The data was recorded and
tabulated under relevant headings and thorough analysis was done.
Results
During
the study period of 3 years, a total of 183 endometrial samples were selected.
Table-1a:
Distribution according to various age groups
Age group (Years) |
Number of patients (%) |
15-20 |
06
(3.3%) |
21-30 |
25
(13.7%) |
31-40 |
46
(25.1%) |
41-50 |
87
(47.5%) |
51-60 |
11
(6.1%) |
61-70 |
05
(2.7%) |
>70 |
03
(1.6%) |
Table
1b: Cases in different age groups
Age Group |
Cases |
Reproductive |
77(42.1%) |
Perimenopausal |
87(47.5%) |
Postmenopausal |
19 (10.4%) |
Total |
183 |
Minimum age of presentation of AUB
was 15 years and maximum was 71 years. Most common age group affected was
between 4th and 5th decade which is perimenopausal age
group (47.5%), (Table1a &1b).
Table
No-2: Relationship of AUB with bleeding pattern
Bleeding Pattern |
No. of Patients(%) |
Disturbances
of Regularity |
30(16.4%) |
Disturbances
of frequency |
28(15.3%) |
Disturbances
of heaviness of flow |
76
(41.5%) |
Disturbances
of the duration of flow |
15(8.2%) |
Abnormal
bleeding with hormonaltherapy |
13(7.1%) |
Irregular
Non-menstrual bleeding |
10(5.5%) |
Bleeding
outside reproductive age |
11(6.0%) |
Table 2 shows that disturbances of
heaviness of flow was the commonest bleeding pattern seen in 76 patients
(41.5%) followed by disturbances of regularity of menstrual cycle seen in 30
patients (16.4%). Least common bleeding pattern was irregular non- menstrual
bleeding seen in 10 patients (5.5%).
Table
No 3: According to Endometrial Histopathology report.
S.No |
Histomorphology finding |
Cases |
Percentage % |
1. |
Proliferative
Endometrium |
71 |
38.8% |
2. |
Secretory
Endometrium |
30 |
16.4% |
3. |
Endometrial
Hyperplasia |
22 |
12.0% |
4. |
Disordered
Proliferative Endometrium |
12 |
6.5% |
5. |
Hormonal
change/pill endometrium |
11 |
6.0% |
6. |
Inadequate |
11 |
6.0% |
7. |
Atrophic
Endometrium |
08 |
4.4% |
8. |
Pregnancy
related changes |
06 |
3.3% |
9. |
Endometritis |
06 |
3.3% |
10. |
Endometrial
Polyp |
04 |
2.2% |
11. |
Endometrial
Carcinoma |
02 |
1.1% |
After detailed microscopic
examination, depending upon their histomorphological features all the cases
were categorized into 11 groups (Table 3). Amongst these, maximum number of the
samples showed proliferative phase 71(38.8%), followed by 30 cases (16.4%) of
secretory phase and endometrial hyperplasia 22(12%). Disordered proliferative
endometrium was observed in 12 (6.5%) cases. Hormonal changes/ pill endometrium
was observed in 11 cases (6.0%). Total 8 cases (4.4%) revealed atrophic
endometrium. Both pregnancy related changes and endometritis were reported in 6
cases (3.3%) each. Among pregnancy related changes there were 2 cases of
retained product of conception (RPOC) and partial mole and single case of
complete mole and Arias – Stella reaction each.
Endometritis
was seen in 6(3.3%) cases, out of which 1 case showed necrotizing granulomatous
endometritis with cystic change i.e caseating granulomas, Langhans type of
giant cells, areas of necrosis with cystic dilation of glands. 3 cases showed
acute on chronic endometritis & remaining 2 cases show chronic endometritis
(Fig 1a &1b).
Endometrial
polyps were seen in 4 (2.2%) cases, out of which 2 cases showed hyperplastic
endometrial polyp. Endometrial carcinoma which is common in postmenopausal
women was encountered in 2(1.1%) cases. Scant endometrial tissue with
predominantly blood clot, autolyzed samples and tissue with suboptimal fixation
that hindered the microscopic evaluation were considered inadequate. In our
study 11 samples (6.2%) were inadequate for evaluation and were excluded from
the study group.
Table
No: 4 Percentage of Endometrial hyperplasia cases
S.no. |
Histologic types |
Number cases |
Percentage (%) |
1 |
Simple
hyperplasia without atypia |
12 |
54.5% |
2 |
Complex
hyperplasia without atypia |
05 |
22.7% |
3 |
Simple
hyperplasia with atypia |
03 |
13.6% |
4 |
Complex
hyperplasia with atypia |
02 |
9.2% |
More than half of the
histomorphologically reported cases of endometrial hyperplasia showed simple
hyperplasia without atypia among which few showed cystic changes. 3 cases
(13.6%) showed simple hyperplasia with atypia and whereas 5(22.7%) cases showed
complex hyperplasia without atypia and 2(9.1%) cases showed complex hyperplasia
with atypia (Table 4).
Table
5: Distribution of cases according to different age group
Age Groups |
15-20 |
21-30 |
31-40 |
41-50 |
51-60 |
61-70 |
>70 |
Proliferative
endometrium |
02 |
09 |
14 |
45 |
01 |
- |
- |
SecretoryEndometrium |
01 |
07 |
11 |
11 |
- |
- |
- |
EndometriumHyperplasia |
- |
01 |
06 |
13 |
02 |
- |
- |
Disordered
ProliferativeEndometrium |
- |
01 |
05 |
04 |
02 |
- |
- |
Hormonal/Pill
endometrium |
- |
01 |
03 |
05 |
01 |
01 |
- |
Atrophic
|
- |
- |
- |
02 |
02 |
01 |
03 |
Inadequate |
- |
01 |
03 |
05 |
01 |
01 |
|
PregnancyChange |
02 |
03 |
01 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Endometritis |
- |
02 |
01 |
02 |
- |
01 |
- |
Endometrial
polyp |
01 |
- |
02 |
- |
01 |
- |
- |
Endo
Ca |
- |
- |
- |
- |
01 |
01 |
- |
Total |
06 |
25 |
46 |
87 |
11 |
05 |
03 |
Maximum number of proliferative
endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia and pill endometrium were present in the 5th
decade. Maximum number of cases of disordered proliferative endometrium in 4th
and 5th decades. Endometrial carcinoma was observed in 6th&
7th decade of life (Table 5), (Fig 2&4).
Fig 1a &1b: Photomicrograph ofNecrotizing
Granulomatous Endometritis showing Caseating granulomas, langhans type of giant
cells & areas of necrosis (40x & 4x).
Fig 2a &2b: Photomicrograph of Endometrial
Carcinoma showing invasive complex endometrial gland with anaplastic epithelial
cells and pleomorphic hyperchromatic nuclei (10x and 40x).
Fig 3: Complex Hyperplasia with atypia (4x), Fig 4:
Endometrial Ca with anaplasticback-to-back glands. (40 x)
Table-6:
Comparison of various histopathological patterns of endometrium in AUB by
various authors
Endometrial
Pattern |
Present
Study |
AyeshaFatima10(2017) |
Sarika5Et
al(2016) |
AnuradhaSalvi13et
al(2015) |
RajeshPatil8
(2013) |
BhoomikaDadhiana14(2013) |
Proliferative |
71(38.8%) |
56(19.7%) |
84(41.6%) |
93(37.2%) |
42(22.1%) |
32(21.3%) |
Secretory |
30(16.3%) |
29(10.2%) |
35 (17.3%) |
46 (18.4%) |
37(19.5%) |
23(15.3%) |
Hyperplasia |
22(12.0%) |
132(46.5%) |
31(15.3%) |
63(25.2%) |
76(40%) |
40(26.7%) |
DisorderProliferative |
12(6.5%) |
14(4.93%) |
15(7.4%) |
- |
- |
Irregular proliferative 4(2.7%) |
Pill/Hormonal Change |
11(6.0%) |
- |
13(6.4%) |
- |
- |
- |
Endometritis |
06(3.3%) |
- |
06(2.97%) |
- |
- |
- |
Polyp |
04(2.2%) |
- |
03(1.5%) |
- |
- |
- |
Atrophic |
08 (4.4%) |
07(2.5%) |
04(1.98%) |
20(8%) |
- |
- |
Endoca |
02(1.1%) |
- |
04(1.98%) |
- |
- |
- |
Pregnancy |
06(3.3%) |
- |
01(0.51%) |
- |
Others 2(1.06% |
Others 38(25.3%) |
Inadequate |
11(6.0%) |
16(5.62%) |
06(2.97%) |
- |
- |
06 (4.0%) |
Discussion
The
endometrium is undergoing regular cyclical changes in response to the
recurrenthormonal changes of the ovulatory cycles thus it is crucial to take
endometrial sample at an appropriate time of ovulatory cycle. Inadequate
clinical information also leads to erroneous diagnosis. AUB with organic cause
can be due to reproductive disease, iatrogenic causes and systemic diseases.
When no specific cause of AUB is found, then by exclusion, a diagnosis of
dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) is assumed. AUB occurs as heavy, prolonged
or acyclic flow at perimenopausal period or as spotting or minimal bleeding at
post-menopausal period and requires proper evaluation to rule out malignancy.
In
the current study 183 specimens of endometrium (curettage/biopsy) were
evaluated in order to find age, clinical and pathological features. The
incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding was more in perimenopausal age group
than postmenopausal age group. This might be due to earlier evaluation. In our
study majority of patients belonged to 41-50 years age group. This is in
concordance to the studies done by Sarika et al [5], Doraiswami S et al [6] and
Muzaffar et al [7]. whereas the study conducted by Rajesh Patil et al [8] and
Mitra K et al [9] showed AUB predominantly in a decade earlier i.e. age group
31-40 year and was recorded to be 45.2% and 62% respectively. The most common
bleeding pattern encountered in present study was heavy menstrual bleeding
57.3% which is comparable with the study by Ayesha Fatima [10] and Rajesh Patil
et al [8].
Comparison
of various histopathological patterns of endometrium in AUB by various authors
is shown in Table 6. Normal physiological phases of endometrium, such as
proliferative and secretory pattern were encountered in maximum number of
cases. Proliferative endometrium comprised of 71 cases (38.8%) in our study,
this finding is in very much alliance with the studies done by Sarika et al
[5], Rajshri P et al [11] and Khare et al [12]. This is followed by secretory
endometrium in 30(16.3%) cases. The third commonest lesion was hyperplasia
observed in 22(12%) cases with its maximum number of patients falling in the
age group of 41 to 50 years which is comparable with study done by Sarika et al
[5] (15.3%) and is in discordance with the studies done by Rajesh Patil et al
[8] (40%), Anuradha salviet al [13] (25.2%), Bhoomika Dadhania et al [14]
(26.7%), who observed a high incidence of endometrial hyperplasia. Endometrial
hyperplasia is commonly seen in perimenopausal age group due to failure of
ovulation. Persistent unripe follicles expose the endometrium to excessive and
prolonged estrogenic action. The incidence of simple hyperplasia was more
common in the perimenopausal age group. In our study there were only two cases
(9%) of complex hyperplasia with atypia, this is in contrast to the findings of
Rajshri P et al [11], Khare et al [12] who observed a higher incidence of
19.35% & 33.3% respectively.
12(6.5%)
cases showed disordered proliferative pattern in our study, which is in
accordance with Jetley S et al [15]. The term ‘disordered proliferative
endometrium’ is a complex term that denotes an endometrium that is hyperplastic
but without an increase in endometrial volume. Although it resembles a simple
hyperplasia, but the process is focal rather than diffuse.
Hormonal
change on endometrium was seen in 11(6.0%) cases in our study which was in
concordance with the study done by Sarkiaet al [5] who reported 13 cases
(6.43%). But Khare et al [12] showed effects of hormones in 9 cases only,
whereas Abidet al [16] showed a higher incidence of 27%.
Patients
with chronic endometritis can present with AUB, pelvic pain and infertility,
which are distressful symptoms and thus needs to be timely and accurately
diagnosed because with specific treatment endometrium starts functioning
normally. Study done by Jetly et al [15] found 20 cases of endometritis which
is quite a higher incidence comparing to our study in which this condition was
diagnosed in few patients (6 cases), out of which 3 cases shows acute on
chronic endometritis, 2 cases showed chronic endometritis and remaining 1 case
showed necrotizing granulomatous endometritis with cystic change.
Atrophic
endometrium was seen between 41 -60 years age group i.e. premenopausal and
postmenopausal age groups. The incidence of atrophic endometrium in the present
study (4.4%) is lower as compared with results shown by Abdullah LS et al [17] and Sarika et al [5]. It
is now well known that atrophic endometrium leads to bleeding and it is
postulated to be due to anatomical changes in the vasculature or abnormalities
in the local haemostatic mechanisms. The expanding cystic glands lead to
distension and thinning of veins overlying these glands and eventually making
the vessel prone to injury.
Endometrial
polyps are defined as polypoidal fragments lined with epithelium on its three
sides, fibrous stroma and thick walled blood vessels. The incidence of
endometrial polyp was (2.2%) in our study, which is in accordance with Jetley S
et al [15] (2.7%) and Doraiswami S et al [6] in (11.2%). 2 cases (1.1%) of
endometrial carcinoma were found in this study which is common in
post-menopausal age group. This finding is comparable to the findings in
Sarikaet al [5] (1.98%). On the contrary, this finding is lower than the
incidence recorded by Doraiswami et al [6] (4.4%), Khare et al [12] (3.7%)
& Bhatta et al [18] (5.7%). Endogenous and exogenous hyperestrogenism is
the most common risk factors for endometrial carcinoma. The most common
precursor lesion for endometrial carcinoma is endometrial hyperplasia. Changes
of pregnancy were seen in 6(3.3%) cases in 15-40 year age with findings of
RPOC, partial mole, complete mole and Arias-stella reaction. Eleven cases
(6.0%) of endometrial biopsies were scanty and inadequate for opinion.
Conclusion
The
histopathological study of endometrium in females with abnormal uterine
bleeding in all the age groups plays an important role in diagnosing various
histopathological patterns and aetiopathological factors. Present study
confronted a wide spectrum of histomorphological changes in endometrial
biopsies of patients presenting with AUB ranging from normal endometrium to
malignancy.
However
histopathological evaluation of endometrial biopsies is a challenging task for
pathologist due to the frequent inadequate endometrial sampling requiring
proper screening of endometrial samples for prompt but accurate diagnosis.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
References
How to cite this article?
Sharma R., Mishra P., Kumar N., Srivastava P. Histomorphological spectrum of endometrial lesion in women presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding: A 3-year study at a tertiary care center. Trop J Path Micro 2018;4(7):525- 531.doi:10.17511/ jopm. 2018.i7.08.