An extensive study: to assess the changing trends in
prevalence and development of TTIs in non-remunerated blood donors at a
tertiary care teaching hospital in Central India
Jain R.1, Jain P.2 Mohit Kashiv3, P. Desai4, U. Chudgar5, N. Choudhury6, V.K. Mahadik7
1Dr.
Roopam Jain, 2Dr. Preeti Jain, 3Dr. Mohit Kashiv, C. R. Gardi Hospital and R. D.
Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, MP, India, 4Dr. P. Desai, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, 5Dr.
U. Chudgar, Prathama Blood Centre,
Ahmedabad, 6Dr. N. Choudhury, Fortis
Memorial Hospital, Delhi, 7Dr. V.K. Mahadik, C. R. Gardi Hospital and R. D. Gardi Medical College,
Ujjain, MP, India.
Corresponding Author:
Dr. Preeti Jain, C.R. Gardi Hospital and
R.D.Gardi Medical College, Ujjain, MP, India
Abstract
Background:
Transfusion transmitted infections (TTI) are a major challenge to the
transfusion services all over the world. The problem of TTIs is directly
proportionate to the prevalence of the infection in the blood donor community
which represents the general population. The purpose of this study is to
analyze the status of Transfusion transmitted infections among seemingly
healthy donors, targeting the non-remunerated blood donors (voluntary and
replacement) during the period 2009- 2017. Material
and method: A total of 84,975 blood donors were screened for seropositivity
of HBsAg, anti-HCV, HIV, VDRL and malaria antigen at Regional blood transfusion
center, in central India. Result: Out
of 84,975 donations, 1906 (2.24%) were sero-reactive for five blood transmitted
infections. Among these, prevalence of HIV was 0.067% (57 donors), seroprevalence
of HBsAg was 1.39% (1184 donors), HCV showed 0.068% (58 donors), VDRL showed
0.66% (564 donors) and malaria had 0.05% prevalence (43 donors). Conclusion: HBV is the most common
infection among voluntary blood donors, followed by Syphilis. Replacement
donors have higher prevalence of TTIs in overall donor population. A change to
voluntary blood transfusion service would reduce the chances of post
transfusion infections.
Keywords:
Blood donors, TTIs, Seropositivity, Prevalence,
Voluntary donors, Replacement donors
Author Corrected: 10th August 2018 Accepted for Publication: 16th August 2018
Introduction
Transfusion transmitted infections impose
significant burden on Blood Safety. The incidence rates across the world are
difficult to calculate given the asymptomatic and often latent nature of the disease
prior to clinical presentation. Every blood transfusion therefore carries a
potential risk for transmissible diseases [1].
Transmission of diseases still occurs, primarily
because of the inability of the test to detect the disease in the ‘window’ phase
of their infection, high cost of screening, a lack of funds and trained
personnel, immunologically variant viruses, non-seroconverting chronic or
immuno silent carriers and inadvertent laboratory testing errors[2].
Blood transfusion is a lifesaving measure in various
medical and surgical emergencies. Transfusion medicine, apart from being
important for the medical treatment of each patient, also has great public
health importance. National blood policy adopted by Ministry of Health and
Family Welfare in 2002, with major objective to reiterate firmly the Government’s
commitment to provide safe and adequate quantity of blood, blood components and
blood products [3].
Currently the
transfusion transmitted infections are divided into four divisions namely,
viral, bacterial, parasitic and emerging. However, to ensure safe blood
donation, NACO (National Aids Control Organization) recommends the testing of 5
TTIs. They are HIV, HBV, HCV, Malaria and Syphilis[4].
Voluntary unpaid blood donors are vital for ensuring
a sufficient, stable blood supply. A well-established voluntary unpaid blood
donor program can contribute to a significant reduction in the risk for TTIs.
India reports the greatest increase in the number of voluntary unpaid blood
donations from 3.6 million in 2007 to 4.6 million in 2008 and from 7.4 million
in 2012 to 8.5 million in 2013 [5].
This study focuses to assess the yearly trends and
development of TTIs during a study period of 9 years from 2009- 2017 at
Regional Blood Transfusion Center in central India.
Aims and Objectives
1. To
evaluate the seroprevalence of TTIs among apparently healthy donors.
2. To
assess seroprevalence of TTI among different donor groups.
3. To
observe the yearly trends and variations in the prevalence of TTIs.
Material and Method
Place
of study-Regional blood transfusion center, C R
Gardi Hospital and R D Gardi Medical College, Ujjain.
Type
of study- Cross-sectional and Observational Study
Duration
of study- The study was performed among all the
units of blood collected during a period of nine years (2009-2017).
Inclusion
criteria-The subjects included all replacement
and voluntary blood donors. Donors were selected by taking history, clinical
examination and following donors’ selection criteria according to the Indian
FDA rules and regulations for donor selection. Written consent was taken. Blood
was collected in blood bags containing anticoagulant-preservative solution.
About 3-5 ml of donor blood was also collectedin pilot tube for ABO grouping,
Rh typing and testing of infectious diseases.
Procedure
Planned-Donor samples were analyzed for the TTIs
like Malaria, HIV, Syphilis and Hepatitis, with routine examinations of blood
grouping and Rh typing.
All the samples were screened for Hepatitis B
surface antigen (HBs Ag), HIV (1and 2), Hepatitis C virus (HCV) by ELISA method
for determination of respective antigens and antibodies in human serum/plasma.
Screening for Syphilis was done Syphilis Rapid Test Strips to detect antibodies
for Treponema Pallidum in serum/plasma/whole blood. Malaria parasite was
screened by gold standard light microscopy.
Additional data analysis was conducted to examine
the prevalence trends associated with each infection.
Data
Collection- Information regarding donor was
extracted from Donor register. Donor register is filled for eligible donors
before blood collection. The data included relevant history, clinical
examination findings and results for HIV, Syphilis, HBV, HCV, and Malaria.
Data
Analysis- Computerized compilation and coding of
collected data was done. All statistical analysis was made by using Stata
(version 12, college station, Texas, USA). For comparing various categorical
variables we used ‘Chi-square’ test of significance, ‘Yates correction’ was
used at relevant places. ‘Z-test’ of variation between two means was applied to
compare various means at 5% level of significance. P-value of <0.05 was
considered statistically significant
Result
A total of 84,975 donors were enlisted in the study.
Of these, 24,135 (28.40%) were voluntary and 60,840 (71.60%) replacement
donors. Males outnumbered females with 79,137 (93.13%) donations while only
5,838 (6.87%) donors were females. Among these, 55,565 (65.39%) of the donors
aged from 18 to 30 years, 21,125 (24.86%) from 31 to 40 years and 8,285 (9.75%)
were in the 41–60 years age group.
Fig01:
Seroprevalence of various TTIs. Out of
total 84,975 donors,
1906 were found seropositive for various
TTIs.
Fig. 02:
Annual trends in the prevalence of overall TTI among voluntary and replacement
donors. Out of 84,975 donors, 1906 donors were found seropositive for various
TTIs, of which 1296 (68%) were replacement donors and rest 610 (32%) were
Voluntary donors.
Fig.
03: Seroprevalence of various TTIs among different blood donors. Out of 1906
seropositive donors, 1296 were replacement donors and rest, 610 were voluntary
donors.
Fig.-04: Annual trends
of each TTI over the study period 2009-2017
Table-01: Incidence of TTI amongst voluntary and
replacement donors during nine year study period (2009–2017).
Year |
Totaldonors |
Seropositive Replacement Donors |
Seropositive Voluntary Donors |
Total Seropositive Donors |
2009 |
5594 |
64 (1.14%) |
31 (0.55%) |
95 |
2010 |
8979 |
153 (1.7%) |
72 (0.80%) |
225 |
2011 |
9156 |
181 (1.97%) |
85 (0.93%) |
266 |
2012 |
8135 |
152 (1.86%) |
72 (0.88%) |
224 |
2013 |
9230 |
168 (1.82%) |
79 (0.85%) |
247 |
2014 |
12065 |
188 (1.55%) |
89 (0.74%) |
277 |
2015 |
11178 |
151 (1.35%) |
69 (0.62%) |
220 |
2016 |
11378 |
144 (1.26%) |
68 (0.59%) |
212 |
2017 |
9160 |
95 (1.04%) |
45 (0.49%) |
140 |
Total |
84975 |
1296 |
610 |
1906 |
Table 02- Incidence of HIV, HBsAg, HCV, Syphilis and
Malaria in blood donors during nine year study period (2009- 2017).
Year |
Donors |
HIV |
HBsAg |
HCV |
VDRL |
Malaria |
2009 |
5594 |
4 (0.07%) |
68 (1.21%) |
3 (0.05%) |
18 (0.32%) |
2 (0.03%) |
2010 |
8979 |
8(0.09%) |
158 (1.75%) |
6 (0.06%) |
49 (0.54%) |
4 (0.04%) |
2011 |
9156 |
11 (0.12%) |
158 (1.72%) |
18 (0.19%) |
77 (0.84%) |
2 (0.02%) |
2012 |
8135 |
8 (0.09%) |
133 (1.63%) |
6 (0.07%) |
72 (0.88%) |
5(0.06%) |
2013 |
9230 |
4 (0.04%) |
145 (1.57%) |
7 (0.07%) |
87 (0.94%) |
4 (0.04%) |
2014 |
12065 |
6 (0.05%) |
172 (1.42%) |
8 (0.06%) |
84 (0.69%) |
7(0.06%) |
2015 |
11178 |
7 (0.06%) |
125 (1.12%) |
2 (0.02%) |
80 (0.71%) |
6(0.05%) |
2016 |
11378 |
6 (0.05%) |
137 (1.20%) |
2 (0.02%) |
62 (0.54%) |
5(0.04%) |
2017 |
9160 |
3 (0.03%) |
88 (0.96%) |
6 (0.06%) |
35 (0.38%) |
8 (009%) |
Total |
84975 |
57 (0.067%) |
1184(1.39%) |
58(0.068%) |
564(0.663%) |
43(0.050%) |
Out
of the 84,975 blood donors, 1,906 (2.24%) were tested reactive for various
blood transmitted infections (Fig. 01). Out of these seropositive donors, 1,296
(68%) were replacement donors (Fig. 02). The prevalence for HIV was 0.067% (57
donors) in total donors, more in replacement (45 donors) as compared to
voluntary (12 donors). The seroprevalence of HBsAg in total donors was 1.39%
(1184 donors). Replacement donors (760 donors) had a high incidence as compared
to voluntary donors (424 donors). The seropositivity of HCV in total donors was
0.068% (58 donors), with a higher seropositivity (39 donors) in replacement
donor group. The seroprevalence of VDRL among all donors was 0.66% (564 donors)
with the replacement donors (418 donors) having a higher prevalence as compared
to voluntary donors (146 donors). Forty three (0.05%) blood donors tested
positive for malaria parasite. In all the five diseases the incidence was high
in males and in replacement donors (Fig. 03) (Table- 01). The concurrent rates
for seroreactivity were highest for HBsAg followed by VDRL, HCV, HIV, and
malaria in descending order (Fig. 04) (Table- 02).
Discussion
Transfusion of blood and blood components, as a
specialized modality of patient management saves millions of lives worldwide
each year and reduces morbidity. It is well known that blood transfusion is
associated with a large number of complications, some are only marginal and
others are potentially life threatening, demanding for thorough pretransfusion
testing and screening particularly for TTIs.
In our study, the number of replacement donors (71.60%)
was higher than voluntary blood donors (28.40%). The number of replacement donors
was consistently higher than voluntary donors over the years. However, there
was a trend for increasing voluntary blood donation in the recent years and the
percentage of voluntary donations increased in the last few years to 33.2%.
This increase was seen due to strong blood donor motivation strategies over the
years.
Of the total donation received, majority (93.13%)
were from male donors. This could be explained on the basis that the Indian
women have a very high incidence of anemia especially in the child bearing age
and hence are likely to face disqualification while being screened for blood
donation.
Overall prevalence of TTIs estimated in our study (2.24%)
is significantly lower than the prevalence found in other studies [6,7,8,10]. This
studyhavealso shown high seropositivity rates of TTIs in replacement donors
compared to voluntary donors, a similar finding was noted in other studies [2,7,9,11,13,16].
Seroprevalence of HIV, HBsAg, HCV, VDRL and malaria
found in this study are 0.067%, 1.39%, 0.068%, 0.66% and 0.05% respectively. Hepatitis
B and C and HIV units are of major concern due to carrier state and
complications associated with these infections.Hepatitis B virus (HBV),
hepatitis C virus (HCV), Human immune deficiency virus (HIV) and syphilis are
the most important lethal agents in transfusion transmitted infections (TTIs)
and it remains a large health care burden globally. The incidence rates across
the world are difficult to calculate given the asymptomatic and often latent
nature of the disease prior to clinical presentation. Every blood transfusion
therefore carries a potential risk for transmissible diseases.
HBV incidence is higher in our population (1.39%) as
compared to other similar studies [2,6,7,13,14]. HBV positivity indicates a
carrier state or an active infection. These seropositive donors may progress to
develop chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and even progress to hepatocellular
carcinomas.
A WHO report states that the viral dose in HIV
transmission through blood is so large that one HIV positive transfusion leads
to death, on an average, after 2 years in children and after three to 5 years
in adults [16]. HIV seropositive donors were 0.067% of the total (84,975) blood
donors studied, which is lower than the published data in other studies [6,7,8,9,10,13,14].
VDRL reactive donors were estimated at 0.66% in this
study which is greater than calculated in other studies [2,6,7,9,12,13,14].
Transfusion transmitted syphilis is not a major hazard in modern blood
transfusion therapy. It is not the transmission of syphilis that is worrisome,
being a sexually transmitted disease, it’s presence points towards donor’s
indulgence in “high risk” behavior and consequent higher risk of exposure to
infections like HIV and hepatitis [17].
Of the major transfusion transmitted diseases,
malaria is a major cause of TTPI in tropical countries. Blood transfusion
possesses a problem because the parasites keep their infective activity for at
least 14 days in blood bottles stored at 4 0C, a leading cause of
TTPI [18].
A moderately fluctuating trend was observed in our
series for all infections with a mild reduction in hepatitis B and syphilis
infection in the recent years (Fig. 04). Improvements must be made in donor
selection criteria and screening for infectious diseases in order to provide a
safe blood supply. Blood can save lives; however, it also carries the potential
to transmit life-threatening infections.
Methods to ensure a safety blood supply should be
encouraged. For that, screening with a better selection of donors and use of
sensitive screening tests including nucleic acid testing technology should be
implemented.
Conclusion
In this study the overall prevalence of TTIs was
estimated at 2.24%, with seroprevalence of HIV, HBsAg, HCV, VDRL and malaria
found in this study are 0.067%, 1.39%, 0.068%, 0.66% and 0.05% respectively. There
was increased seropositivity rate amongst the replacement donors as compared to
the voluntary donors.
Blood transfusion is an important preventable
modality of spread of TTIs. It is a time of urgent and concrete measures to
eliminate the transfusions from paid donors and to improve the safety of the blood
supply. To provide proper transfusion facilities to underdeveloped areas. These
conditions can be overcome by development of a fair and organized system of
blood screening and transfusion.
Despite stringent donor screening and testing
practices, safe blood free from TTIs remains an elusive goal because the threat
of TTIs agents entering the blood supply is not static. This study showed
growing evidence in the burden of TTIs in blood donors. The field of
transfusion medicine has encountered huge precautions in providing safe blood.
Prevention of spread of TTIs should be the main goal at the current time.
Funding:
Nil
Conflicts of interest:
All authors declare that he/she has no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval:
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in
accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national
research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later
amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed
consent: Informed consent was obtained from all
individual participants included in the study.
References
1.
Bhawani Y, Rao PR, Sudhakar V: Seroprevalence of transfusion transmissible
infections among blood donors in a tertiary care hospital of Andhra Pradesh.
Biol Med, 2010, 2(4):45-48.
2.
Fernandes H, D'souza PF, D'souza PM. Prevalence of transfusion transmitted
infections in voluntary and replacement donors. Indian J Hematol Blood
Transfus. 2010 Sep;26(3):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s12288-010-0044-0. Epub 2010 Oct
21.[pubmed]
3.
NACO: National Blood Policy, National AIDS Control Organization, Ministry of
Health and Family Welfare Government of India, New Delhi, 2007
[www.naco.nic.in]
4.
Neelam Marwaha: Voluntary blood donation in India: Achievements, expectations
and challenges. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015 Apr; 9(Suppl. 1): S1–S2. doi:
10.4103/0973-6247.157011
5.
Global status report on blood safety and availability 2016. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2017.
6.
Dushyant Singh Gaur, Gita Negi: Trends of transfusion transmissible diseases
among blood donors at Uttarakhand, India. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 3,
July-September, 2014, pp. 183-186
7. R.N. Makroo, Vikas Hegde, Mohit Chowdhry,
Aakanksha Bhatia, and N.L. Rosamma Seroprevalence of infectious markers &
their trends in blood donors in a hospital based blood bank in North India.
Indian J Med Res. 2015 Sep; 142(3): 317–322. [pubmed]
8.
Jain R, Jain P, Mahadik V, Choudhury N: Prevalence And Incidence Of Transfusion
Transmitted Infections Amongst VNRBDs In Central India. Natl J Integr Res Med,
2015; 6(4): 82-85
9.
Garg S, Mathur DR, Garg DK. Comparison of seropositivity of HIV, HBV,
HCV and syphilis in replacement and voluntary blood donors in western
India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2001 Oct;44(4):409-12.[pubmed]
10.
Buseri FI, Muhibi MA, Jeremiah ZA. Sero-epidemiology of
transfusion-transmissible infectious diseases among blood donors in Osogbo,
south-west Nigeria. Blood Transfus. 2009 Oct;7(4):293-9. doi:
10.2450/2009.0071-08.[pubmed]
11.
Tulika Chandra, S. Nishat Fatima Rizvi, and Devisha Agarwal: Decreasing
Prevalence of Transfusion Transmitted Infection in Indian Scenario. The
Scientific World Journal Volume, 2014, Article ID 173939, 4 pages
12.
N Kocak, S Hepgul, S Ozbayburtluet al: Trends
in Major Transfusion-transmissible Infections among Blood Donors over 17 Years
in Istanbul, Turkey The Journal of
International Medical Research, 2004;
32: 671 – 675
13.
Pallavi P, Ganesh CK, Jayashree K, Manjunath GV. Seroprevalence and trends in transfusion
transmitted infections among blood donors in auniversity hospital blood bank: a
5 year study. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2011 Mar;27(1):1-6. doi:
10.1007/s12288-010-0047-x. Epub 2010 Dec 14.[pubmed]
14.
Chandekar SA, Amonkar GP, Desai HM, Valvi N, Puranik GV. Seroprevalence of
transfusion transmitted infections in healthy blood donors: A 5-year Tertiary
Care Hospital experience. J Lab Physicians, 2017; 9:283-7.
15. Choudhury N, Ramesh V, Saraswat S, Naik S:
Effectiveness of mandatory transmissible diseases screening in Indian blood
donors. The Indian Journal of Medical Research, 1995.[01 Jun 1995, 101:229-232]
16.
Arora D, Arora B, Khetarpal A. Seroprevalence of HIV, HBV, HCV and
syphilis in blood donors in Southern Haryana. Indian J Pathol
Microbiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;53(2):308-9. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.64295.[pubmed]
17.
Ness PM: Bacterial and protozoal infections transmitted by transfusion. In:
Principles of Transfusion Medicine. EC Rossi , TL Simon , GS Moss, (Eds.), 1st
Edn; Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1991: pp.611-618.
18.
K. Park. Epidemiology of Communicable Diseases In: Park’s Textbook of
Preventive and Social Medicine, 24th edition, Bhanot Publishers, 2017, p.271.
How to cite this article?
Jain R, Jain P, Mohit Kashiv, P. Desai, U. Chudgar, N. Choudhury, V.K. Mahadik. An extensive study: to assess the changing trends in prevalence and development of TTIs in non-remunerated blood donors at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Central India. Trop J Path Micro 2018; 4(6):448-454.doi:10. 17511/ jopm. 2018.i6.06.