A Retrospective study of 130 cases in
all age group presented with palpable head and neck swelling
Patel
F.1, Gonsai R.N.2, Patel M.L.3, Qureshi N.4,
Vora M.5
1Dr.
FalguniPatel,2Dr. R. N. Gonsai,3Dr. M. L. Patel,4Dr.
Nasrin Qureshi,5Dr. Maulik Vora, all authors are attached with
Department of Pathology, Dr. M K Shah Medical College & Research Centre,
Chandkheda, Ahmedabad
Corresponding
Author: Dr. Maulik Vora, E-mail:
dr.falgunipatelfp@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction:FNAC
is a simple, quick, inexpensive and minimally invasive technique for early diagnosis
of palpable lesions in Head and neck. It is usually performed in outpatient
department with nearly no complications.
Objectives:To evaluate the role of FNAC and its utility in the diagnosis of
palpable head and neck masses. To study the spectrum of head and neck lesions
and its correlation with age, sex, and frequency of occurrence and its
categorization into various groups.
Methods:A study was conducted over a period of one year and two months by
pathology department, SMS hospitals and Dr. M.K.Shah Medical College,
Ahmedabad. Total 130 cases of Head and neck lesions were included during the
study period. All patients coming from OPD’S of different departmentspresented
with head and neck swellingwere included in the study.Result:Out of 130 cases, 59(45%) were male, 71(55%) were female.
Head and neck swelling was most common in the age group of 21-30 years (25.3%).Highest
number of FNAC was done from lymph node followed by Thyroid gland and Salivary
gland respectively. Lymph node swelling were the most common 81(62%), followed
by thyroid 28(22%), skin/subcutaneous 12(9%), salivary gland 09(07%). Conclusion:The accuracy of cytology
diagnosis is very high if the requisition forms are accompanied with all
relevant clinical history along with proper laboratory information. FNAC could
differentiate the infective process from neoplastic one and avoids unnecessary surgeries.
Thus, FNAC can be recommended as a first line of investigation in the diagnosis
of head and neck swellings.
Key
words:Head and Neck, FNAC, Benign and
Malignant lesions, TuberculousLymphadenitis.
Author Corrected: 10th August 2018 Accepted for Publication: 14th August 2018
Introduction
The art and science of
cytology and cytopathology has been implemented and recognized as early as the
18th and 19th[1-5]. The first American Board of
Examination in cytopathology was undertaken in 1989.Europeans,especially north
Scandinavian countries,were able to utilize this technique even before the
World War II[1,4].The science of cytopathology is currently well standardized
with two major branches, exfoliative and aspiration biopsy.
FNAC is a very simple
diagnostic tool for the superficial swelling in the head and neck region [6].FNAC
is also very convenient now a days for clinicians because it is OPD base
procedure and it avoids the complications related to anesthesia and open
biopsy. It differentiates the lesions whether it is neoplastic or non-neoplastic
that greatly influences the planned treatment[7].
Among the most
frequently sampled palpable head and neck lesions are lymph nodes, thyroid and
salivary glands along with other rarely encountered lesions like subcutaneous tissue
swellings, lumps of skin appendages and oral cavity lesions.8Head
and neck neoplasia is one of the cause of cancer in India accounts 23% of all
male cancers and 6% of all female cancers[9]. FNAC is very useful in cervical
swellings because cervicalbiopsy is avoided unless all other methods fail to
establish the diagnosis[10].
The prime objective of
this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC in the Head and Neck lesions,
to assist the surgeon in selection of the patient for surgery and palliative
therapy.
Methods
Place
of study and type of study:This retrospective
study was conducted at SMS multispecialty hospital and Dr. M.K.Shah Medical College
and research Centre, Chandkheda, Ahmedabad from November 2016 to December 2017.
Inclusion
criteria:All patients with neck swelling who were
presented in different OPDs were included in the study.
Exclusion
criteria:Patients who presented with swellings
other than neck were excluded from the study.
Sample
collection and sampling methods:Those patients
who were presented with swelling in neck region from Medicine, ENT, Surgery,
Pediatrics, Orthopedics and Skin Department and requested for FNAC were
included in the study. Through examinations of patients were done and detailed
history of the aboutswelling as well as related history such as family history
of T.B, colloid goiter, cancer and other diseases were taken. A detailed examination
of the swelling was done and its size,shape,consistency,movement, tenderness,
skin overlying it was noted. Examinations of local lymph nodes were done. Patients
were explained about procedure; risk and a written consent was taken. FNAC was
done by 22-23 gauged 3-5 cm long needle with 10 ml syringe by a trained
Pathologist with all aseptic precautions.Minimum three to four slides were made
from aspirated material from the swelling, wet fixed in 95% alcohol and were
stained by H & E stain.If fluid is drained from theswelling it is collected
in EDTA vacuatte and slides are prepared from sediment obtained from it.
Reporting was done by expert Pathologist and Cytomorphological findings from
all patients were recorded and advised biopsy depending upon the pathology.
Statistical
analysis: The obtained parameters were evaluated
using descriptivestatisticalanalysis.Statistical analyses were performed
usingMicrosoft Office Excel 2010 software.
Results
Total 130 patients from
SMS Multispecialtyhospital underwent head and neck FNAC during the study period
from Nov-2016 to Dec-2017. There were 59(45%) Male and 71(55%) Females. The
male to female ratio is 9:11.
Table-1:Age
wise distribution of all patients
Age (in years) |
No of patients |
Percentage |
0-10 |
18 |
13.8% |
11-20 |
19 |
14.6% |
21-30 |
33 |
25.3% |
31-40 |
18 |
13.8% |
41-50 |
15 |
11.5% |
51-60 |
16 |
12.3% |
61-70 |
08 |
6.15% |
71-80 |
02 |
1.50% |
81-90 |
01 |
0.76% |
The
most common age group involved in the study is 21-30 years.The youngest and the
oldest age in the study is 2and 81 yearsrespectively [Table 1].
Table-2:
Site wise distribution of lesions
Site of FNAC |
No of patients (%) |
Lymph node |
81(62) |
Thyroid |
28(22) |
Salivary
gland |
09(07) |
Skin/soft
tissue |
12(09) |
Total |
130(100) |
As
seen in table2the most common site is Lymph node 81 (62%)and the least common
is salivary gland 09 (07%).
The most common lesion
in the lymph node,thyroid,skin and subcutaneous tissue is reactive
lymphadenitis 44 (54%), ColloidGoitre16 (57%),Lipoma and least common is Acute
suppurative inflammation 02 (2.5%), Lymphocytic Thyroiditis 03(11%),sebaceous
and keratinous cyst respectively.
In salivary gland there
is equal number of cases of pleomorphic adenoma and Benign Salivary gland
lesion.
Table-3:Frequency
distribution according to nature of the swelling
Nature of the swelling |
No of patients (%) |
Benign |
124(95.4) |
Malignant |
6(4.6) |
Total |
130(100) |
Majority
of the cases in the study are Benign, only 4.6% cases are malignant, all of which
are metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in lymph node. No malignant lesion is
found in thyroid,salivary, skin and subcutaneous tissue.
Discussion
In 1930, Martin and
Ellis described and first introduced the technique of FNAC for diagnosis of
organ lesion [11].
The two fundamental
requirements on which success of FNA depends are nonrepresentative sample and
high quality of preparation. These two prerequisites will always remain a sine
qua non,no matter how sophisticated are the supplementary techniques [6].
Table-4:
Comparison of sex wise distribution of cases in various studies
Name of study |
No. Of cases |
||
Male |
Female |
Total |
|
Pathak R
et al [12] |
116 |
93 |
209 |
Himanshu
Shekhar et al [13] |
114 |
86 |
200 |
Garima Gupta
R et al [14] |
56 |
90 |
146 |
Shaan
Khetrapalet al [15] |
128 |
162 |
290 |
Nanik J
et al [16] |
376 |
380 |
750 |
Present
study |
59 |
71 |
130 |
In
our study the common age group was 21-30 (<50) years which comprised of 31
patients which is similar to the Pathak R et alstudy in which the predominant
age group was <50 years and number of patients was 127 out of 209 patients
[12] and the Himanshu Shekhar et al [1study in which the preponderance were
seen in the 31 to 45 (<50) years with 62 patients out of 200 patients [13].
The peak incidence in
Himanshu Shekhar et al [13]was between 21 to 30(<50)years with 90 patients
out of 290 patients, which is similar to the present study.
Table-5:
Comparison of Distribution of Head and Neck lesions according to the
Predominant site in different studies
Name of study |
Predominant site |
Number of cases |
Total No. Of cases |
Pathak R et al [12] |
Lymph node |
128 |
209 |
Himanshu Shekhar et al [13] |
Lymph node |
84 |
200 |
Garima Gupta R et al [14] |
Lymph node |
107 |
146 |
Fernandeset al [17] |
Thyroid |
350 |
629 |
Present study |
Lymph node |
81 |
130 |
Table-6:
Comparison of frequency of Lesion (most common diagnosis) according to the site
in different studies
Name of study |
Site(most common diagnosis) |
||
Lymphnode |
Thyroid |
Salivary gland |
|
Pathak R et al [12] |
Reactive Lymph node |
Colloid goitre |
Sialdenosis |
Himanshu Shekhar et al[13] |
Reactive Lymph node |
Colloid goitre |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
Garima Gupta R et al [14] |
Tuberculous lymphadenitis |
- |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
Shaan Khetrapalet al [15] |
Granulomatous lymphadenitis |
Colloid goitre |
Chronic sialadenitis |
Shreedevi et al [18] |
Reactive Lymph node |
Nodular goitre |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
Deval N. Patelet al [19] |
Nonspecific inflammatory lesion |
Benign neoplastic lesion |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
Sudershan Kapoor et al [20] |
Tuberculous lymphadenitis |
Colloidgoitre |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
Present study |
Reactive lymphadenitis |
Colloidgoitre |
Pleomorphic adenoma |
In
present study the most common lesion in skin and subcutaneous tissue is lipoma
which is similar to the findings in other studies[13,15,18]. In Pathak R et al,
And Sudershan Kapoor et al studies the common diagnosis was epidermal cyst,
while in Deval N.Patelet alstudy the benign cystic lesion was the commonest
finding[12,20,19].
Inflammatory and
non-neoplastic lesions was the predominant cause of head and neck masses in our
study which is in concordance with most of the national studies, while various
international studies show neoplastic lesion as the commonest finding.
Conclusion
It was concluded from
the present study, that reactive lymphadenitis is the commonest problem in
patients presenting with neck swellings in our set up. As benign lesions (124)
cases overrated the malignant one (6) cases and FNAC could differentiate the
inflammatory process from neoplastic one. Nowadays with increasing cost of
medical facilities any technique which heralds the process of diagnosis, limits
the physical and psychological trauma to the patients and is cost effective
will be of tremendous value. Histopathology confirmation of FNAC should be done
to arrive at the accurate conclusion; hence this technique should be complement
to each other along with newer diagnostic techniques.
So we conclude that
FNAC is an excellent preliminary test and a useful adjunct to histopathology.
What
this study adds to existing knowledge:This
study provides with knowledge of evaluation of swelling whether benign,
inflammatory or malignant without surgery or in setups where proper surgical
facilities are unavailable, so that proper management of patients can be done
on time.
Author
contributions: All authors had equally contributed
in each and every part of research like proposal making, data collection,
statistical analysis and manuscript making.
References
1. Frable WJ.
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy: a review. Human Pathology 1983; 14(1):9-28. [pubmed]
2. Frable WJ.
Integration of surgical and cytopathology: A historical perspective. Diagnostic
cytopathology1995;13(5):375-8. [pubmed]
3. DeMay RM. The art
and science of cytopathology. 1996. American Society of Clinical Pathologists
Press, Chicago, IL.
4. Cibas ES, Ducatman
BS. Cytology: diagnostic principles and clinical correlates. Gulf Professional
Publishing; 2003.
5. Geisinger KR,
Stanely MW, Raab SS, Silverman JF, Abati A. Modern Cytopathology. Philadelphia,
Pa: Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
6. Orell SR, Sterrett
GF, Walters MN, Whitaker D. Manual and Atlas of Fine Needle Aspiration
Cytology. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone 2nd ed.1995.
7. Watkinson JC, Wilson
JA, Gaze M, Stell PM, Maran AGD. Stell and Maran’s Head and neck surgery,
Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 4thedition ,chapter 2; 2000. P20-21.
8. Chauhan S, RathodD,Joshi
DS. FNAC of swellings of head and neck region. Indian Journal of Applied and
Basic Medical Sciences2011;13:1-6.
9. Rao YN, Gupta S,
Agarwal SP, National Cancer Control Programme: Current status & strategies.
In Agarwal SP,ed. Fifty Years of Cancer Control In India. Dir Gen of Health
Services, MOHFW, Government of India,2002;41-7.
10. Layfield LJ.
Fine-needle aspiration of the head and neck. Pathology- Phila 1996;4:409-38. [pubmed]
11. Martin H, Ellis EB.
Biopsy of needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg 1930;92:169-81. [pubmed]
12. Pathak R, Prasad
KBR, Rauniyar SK, Pudasaini S, Pande K, Koirala S et al Fine needle aspiration
cytology of head and neck lesions and its correlation with histopathology.
Journal of pathology of Nepal 2016;6:985-9. [pubmed]
13. Shekhar H, Kaur A,
Agrawal P, Pancharia A, Jadeja P. Fine needle aspiration cytologyin head and
neck swellings: a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. Int J Res Med Sci
2014;2(4):1667-71.
14. GuptaG,Joshi DS,
Shah A, Gandhi M, Shah NR.FNAC ofHead and Neck Swellings. GCSMC J Med Sci 2014;3(1):38-41.
15. Khetrapal S, Jetley
S, Jairajpuri Z, Rana R, Kohli S. FNAC of head and neck lesions and its utility
in clinical diagnosis: A study of 290 cases. Natl J Med Res. 2015;5(1):33-38.
16. Nanik J, Rathore H,
Pachori G, Bansod P, RatnawatK.Cytomorphologyof Head and Neck lesions: A study
in teritery care hospital. Panacea Journal of medical science 2015;5(3):145-9.
17. Fernandes H,
D’souza C, Thejaswini B. The role of fine needle aspiration cytology in
palpable head and neck masses. J Clin Diag Res. 2009;(3):1719-25.
18. Sreedevi P, Kishore
Kumar Ch, Parankusa N COriginal Research Article: Diagnostic role of FNAC in
Evaluation of Head and Neck Lesions. Jou of Dent and Med Scie2016;15(9):11-13.
19. PatelDN, Patel PB,
Patel HV, Gandhi TJ. Fine needle aspiration cytology role in head and neck
lesions. IAIM 2015;2(8):99-104.
20. Kapoor S, Bagga PK,
Rupesh S, Singh A, Kumar A, Singh H.Diagnostic accuracy of Fine needle
aspiration cytology in Palpable lesions of head and neck in comparison to
histopathology. Int Jouof Contemporary Med Res 2017;4(2):449-53.