Study of spectrum of head and neck lesions diagnosed on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)

Meenai F. J.1, Jain R.2, Ojha S3, Sawke G. K.4, Gupta S.5

1Dr. Farah Jalaly Meenai, Associate Professor, 2Dr. Rubal Jain, Assistant Professor, 3Dr. Sandeep Ojha, Associate Professor, 4Dr. Gopal Krishna Sawke, Professor and Head, 5Dr. Sonam Gupta, Demonstrator, all authors are affiliated with Department of Pathology, Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Address for Correspondence: Dr. Rubal Jain, A-152, Shahpura, 1st Floor, Behind Shekhar Hospital, Bhopal (M.P). E-mail: drrubaljain@gmail.com



Abstract

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a cost effective and minimally invasive diagnostic outdoor procedure for head and neck lesions with high efficacy. Aims and objectives: To evaluate the spectrum of head and neck lesions with FNAC, its efficacy and correlating thefindings with histopathological diagnosis wherever possible. Materials and Methods: Retrospective observational study of 597 patients evaluated with FNAC for head and neck lesions from 2014 January to December 2016. Data were retrievedfrom the stored reports in Department Of Pathology and the results were analyzed. Clinical and radiological details were obtained from patients’ file wherever deemed necessary from Medical Record Department of the institute. Results: Most common site aspirated were Lymph nodes (64%) followed by Thyroid (18.3%), skin (5.7%) andsoft tissue (4.02%). Most common diagnosis in lymph node FNAC was metastatic lymphadenopathy (37.4%) followed by reactive lymphadenitis (31.9%) and granulomatous lymphadenitis (20.4%). Benign lesions were most common among thyroid swellings (70.1%)followed by papillary carcinoma (12.9%). Majority of salivary gland lesions were benign neoplasm (52.4%). Most common skin and soft tissuelesions were epidermal inclusion cyst (52.9%) and lipoma (66.7%) respectively. Histopathological diagnosis was available in 47.2% of cases with 94.7% concordance. Conclusion: Head and neck lesions are common superficial lesions that can be easily diagnosed oncytology. It differentiates inflammatory/infectionfrom neoplastic lesions and avoids unnecessary surgeries and expedites the management. FNAC is cost effective and accurate diagnostic procedure and can be recommended as a first line investigation.

Keywords: Cytology. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), Head and Neck, Swelling



Manuscript received: 15th November 2017, Reviewed: 24th November 2017
Author Corrected: 30th November 2017, Accepted for Publication: 4th December 2017

Introduction

Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is first line investigation in approach towards diagnosis of superficial and deep seated lesions of head and neck. FNAC is particularly relevant in head and neck location because of easy accessibility, rapidity, minimally invasive, accurate and cost effective procedure which is accepted by majority of the patients. It may help in triage of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions and thus helps to avoid unnecessary surgeries in non-neoplastic lesions thu sexp editing the process of management of malignant lesions [1,2]. It causes minimal trauma to the patient and carries virtually no risk andcomplications. Swellings within the region of head and neck, especially salivary gland and thyroid gland lesions can be readily diagnosed using this technique [3, 4].

Spectrum of lesions of head and neck comprises of developmental, inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. The most common sites which are encountered for FNAC in head and neck region are lymph nodes, thyroid, salivary gland, skin and soft tissue swellings. Lesions like carotid body tumours, branchial cyst, thyroglossal cyst, cystic hygroma, pharyngeal pouch and lump of skin appendages are less commonly encountered [2].

FNAC is both diagnostic and therapeutic in cystic swellings [5]. Fine needle aspiration cytology is helpful for the diagnosis of salivary gland tumors where it can differentiate between a malignant and a benign tumor with over 90% accuracy [6].

FNAC is particularly helpful in the work-up for cervical masses and nodules because biopsy of cervical adenopathy should be avoided unless all other diagnostic modalities have failed to establish a diagnosis [7]. It could be considered as diagnostic procedure of choice in cases of oral carcinoma presenting with neck node metastasis because positive metastatic lymph node on FNAC may avoid biopsy of oral lesions can be avoided if node is positive for metastasis.

In 1930, Martin introduced this technique for evaluation of head and neck lesion and the procedure has since then being used for all palpable swellings [8, 9].FNAC assessment needs relevant clinical history of patient as well as radiological findings to make plausible diagnosis.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wide spectrum of lesions diagnosed on FNAC in patients with head and neck swellings and to know the efficacy of FNAC in diagnosing head and neck lesions.

Material and Methods


Place of study- Department of Pathology, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital.Type of study-This was a retrospective observational study. Sampling methods and collection -Data were retrieved from the stored reports ofpatients in Department Of Pathology and results were tabulated, analyzed and studied. Clinical and radiological details were obtained from patients files. Inclusion and exclusion criteria-All the cases of head and neck cases were segregated from other lesions which were aspirated over a period of two years (January 2015 to December 2016). Relevant clinical and demographic details were noted and tabulated. This study also included FNA performed under ultrasound guidance. Both air dried and alcohol fixed smears stained with May Grundwald Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicalaou (PAP) stain respectively and were studied. Results were also correlated with special stains like Ziehl Nelson (ZN) stain wherever applicable. The sites of FNAC were classified as lymph nodes, thyroid, skin, soft tissue, salivary gland, oral cavity, nasal cavity, parathyroid, orbit and miscellaneous where exact site or location cannot be ascertained. Statistical methods-Data was tabulated,slides were reviewed wherever necessary and the percentages were calculated for estimating frequency of various pathological conditions. The cytological diagnosis was correlated with histopathology wherever available and the concordance rate, sensitivity, specificity value were calculated keeping histopathology diagnosis as gold standard using the statistical program Epi-info.


Result


In present study, out of 1800 patients enrolled for FNAC during study period, 597 patients presented with head and neck swellings. Patients’age ranged from 10 months to 84 years of age with male to female ratio of 1.3:1.

Incidence of lymph node lesions was highest in 382 cases (64 %) followed by thyroid lesion in 109 cases (18.25%), skin lesions in 34 cases (5.7%), soft tissue in 24 (4%) and salivary gland in 21 cases (3.5%). Distribution of lesions with gender distribution was as in Table 1.

Table-1: Distribution of Lesions in Head and Neck FNAC and Gender distribution (Total n=597)

Organ involved

Total cases

Male

Female

Lymph node

382 (64 %)

239

143

Thyroid

109 (18.3 %)

27

82

Skin

34(5.7 %)

22

12

Soft Tissue

24 (4.02%)

16

08

Salivary gland

21(3.5 %)

16

05

Oral and nasal cavity

16(2.7%)

12

04

Parathyroid

02 (0.3%)

01

01

Orbit

01 (0.2%)

00

01

Miscellaneous lesion

08 (1.3%)

06

02

Total

597

339 (56.8%)

258 (43.2%)


The distribution of various sites aspirated and their cytological diagnosis is illustrated in Table 2.

Table-2: Distribution of lesion of head and neck with cytological diagnosis
    

Site

Total cases

Lesions

Cases

%

Lymph Nodes

382

Metastasis

141

36.9%

Reactive Lymphadenitis

118

30.9%

Granulomatous

74

19.4%

Lymphoma

29

7.6%

Acute inflammation

05

1.3%

Inconclusive

15

3.9%

Thyroid

109

Benign lesion & Thyroiditis

75

68.8%

neoplasm

32

29.2%

Inconclusive

2

1.8%

Salivary Gland

21

Inflammatory

5

23.8%

Benign neoplasm

11

52.4%

Malignant

4

19%

Inconclusive

1

4.8%

 

Skin

 

34

Epidermal inclusion cyst

18

52.9%

Inflammatory lesion

10

29.4%

Granulation

5

14.7%

Inconclusive

1

2.9%

Soft Tissue

24

Lipoma

16

66.7%

Benign spindle cell neoplasm

4

16.7%

Lymphangioma

1

4.2%

Chordoma

1

4.2%

Sarcoma

1

4.2%

Inconclusive

1

4.2%

 

Oral Cavity

 

13

Round cell tumor

1

7.7%

Mucococele

1

7.7%

Squamous cell carcinoma

11

84.6%

Orbit

1

Round cell tumor

1

100%

Parathyroid

2

Parathyroid Adenoma

2

100%

Nasal Cavity

3

Squamous cell carcinoma

2

66.6%

Metastasis of Renal Cell Carcinoma

1

33.3%

Miscellaneous lesion

 

8

Benign Cystic lesion

3

37.5%

Brachial cleft cyst

1

12.5%

Inflammatory

4

50%

Total

597

 

597

 


AmongLymph node swellings, the highest number of cases were of non-neoplastic lesion (53.6%) of which majority were reactive (31.9%), followed by granulomatous lymphadenitis (78%) and acute lymphadenitis (1.3%). Malignant lesions were 45 % of which most common were metastatic carcinomas from different sites mostly sqaumous in originfollowed by hematolymphoid malignancies (7.6%). Out of 29 cases of hematolymphoid malignancy, majority of the cases were Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (20 cases, 69%), followed by Hodgkin’s lymphoma (7 cases, 24.1%), one case each ofmyeloid sarcoma and follicular dendritic cell sarcoma. Fine needle aspiration was inconclusive in 1.3% of cases.

Amongst the thyroid swellings, FNAC revealed 68.8% of Non-neoplastic lesions including colloid goiter and thyroiditis. Whereas neoplastic lesions comprised of29.4% of which most common tumor diagnosed was papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) comprising of total 22 cases, followed by 4 cases diagnosed as follicular neoplasm (3.7%), 3 cases each of medullary thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma of thyroid (2.8%). Thyroid lesions had female preponderance with male: female ratio of approximately 1:3.

A total of 21 cases of salivary gland lesions were aspirated, which accountedfor 3.5% of total Head and Neck- swellingswith male predominance. Most common lesions were benign (47.6%) and comprised 6 cases of pleomorphic adenoma, 2 cases of sialadenosis, and 2 benign lymphoepithelial lesions. Malignant neoplasms were second most common and comprised of Adenoid cystic carcinoma (3 cases) and one case each of mucoepidermoid carcinoma, acinic cell carcinoma, and carcinoma- ex- pleomorphic adenoma. There were 4 cases diagnosed as inflammatory lesions of which 3 cases showed features of chronic sialadenitis and one case was of acute sialadenitis.

Thirty four cases of skin lesions located in head and neck region were aspirated, of which the most common lesion was epidermal inclusion cyst (52.9 %) followed by other inflammatory lesions (29.4%). Five cases of malignancy were diagnosed of which three cases were of scar recurrence inknown case of oral squamous carcinoma and one case each of subcutaneous deposits of thyroid carcinoma and primary squamous cell carcinoma of skin.

Soft tissue lesions were also aspirated of which lipoma was most common (66.7%) and was followed by benign spindle cell neoplasm (16.7%) and one case each of lymphangioma, chordoma, malignant spindle cell sarcoma. Thirteen cases of intraoral lesions were also aspirated composed of 8 cases of squamous carcinoma, 3 cases of pleomorphic adenoma and one case each of mucocele and round cell tumor which was later diagnosed as primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Other sites which were also aspirated were orbit (1 case of rhabdomyosarcoma), two cases of parathyroid adenoma, 3 cases of nasal cavity (two cases of squamous carcinoma and one case was of metastasis of renal cell carcinoma). There were 2 cases of thyroglossal cysts, 2 cases of Paraganglioma, one case of branchial cleft cyst and 3 inflammatory lesions whose site of origin cannot be ascertained.

Histopathological diagnosis was available in 47.2% of cases of which cytology was concordant with histopathology in 94.7% of cases and was discordant in 5.6%. Histopathological correlation with cytological diagnosis was as inTable 3 while reason for discordant cases was as in Table 4.

Table-3: Cyto- histopathological correlation of Head and neck lesions

Organ involved

Total cases

Histopath diagnosis available

Concordant

Discordant

Lymph node

382

182

176

6

Thyroid

109

50

47

3

Skin

34

7

6

1

Soft Tissue

24

12

10

2

Salivary gland

21

10

9

1

Oral Cavity

13

11

11

0

Nasal Cavity

03

3

3

0

Parathyroid

02

2

1

1

Orbit

01

1

1

0

Miscellaneous lesion

08

4

3

1

Total

597

282 (47.2%)

267 (94.7%)

15 (5.3%)


Table-4: Distribution of cyto –histopatholgical discordant cases and reasons
    

 

Site of FNAC

Cytological Diagnosis

Histological Diagnosis

Type of error

Case 1

Lymph Node

Acute Lymphadenitis

Cystic metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma

Sampling

Case 2

Lymph Node

Granulomatous

Metastatic signet ring adenocarcinoma

Interpretation

Case 3

Lymph Node

Granulomatous

Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Interpretation

Case 4

Lymph Node

Reactive

Low grade Non Hodgkins Lymphoma

NA as biopsy was advised to rule out NHL

Case 5

Lymph Node

Reactive

Kikuchi like necrotizing lymphadenitis

Sampling

Case 6

Lymph Node

Reactive

Granulomatous

Sampling

Case 7

Thyroid

PTC

Hyperplastic Goitre

Interpretation

Case 8

Thyroid

PTC

Goitre with degeneration

Interpretation

Case 9

Thyroid

Hyperplastic Goitre

PTC

Sampling

Case 10

Parathyroid

Follicular Neoplasm of Thyroid

Parathyroid Adenoma

Improper clinical details

Case 11

Skin

Inflammatory lesion

Scar recurrence of SCC

Sampling

Case 12

Soft Tissue

Benign spindle cell lesion

Angiosarcoma

Interpretation

Case 13

Soft Tissue

Malignant spindle cell sarcoma

Ancient Schwannoma

Interpretation

Case 14

Salivary Gland

Adenoid cystic carcinoma

Pleomorphic adenoma

Interpretation

Case 15

Miscellaneous

PTC

Paraganglioma

Interpretation


Discussion

FNAC is arapid diagnostic test in the initial assessment of the head and neck lesions which are superficial and easy to access .It has inherent advantage of being an outpatientprocedure,does not require sedation or anaesthesia ,minimally painful and takes only few minutes to perform compared to time consuming, complicated and invasivebiopsy procedure [10].


Comparative evaluation of various head and neck lesions was done with other similar studies as in Table 5.

In this study, most common organ aspirated was lymph-node (64%)andmost common diagnosis was metastatic lymphadenopathy which is in discordance with other authors [10-12] who reported reactive lymphadenitis and Valiya LG [13]who reportedgranulomatous lymphadenopathyas most common lesion. The distribution of lymph node cytological assessment in various studies was as in Table 6.


Table-5: Comparison of results of FNAC of head and neck studies

Study

Lymphnode

Thyroid

Salivary Gland

Soft Tissue

Nanik J (10)

64.3%

17.5%

4.8%

13.5%

Kishor H.et.al.(11)

39.58%

31.25%

18.75%

7.29%

Sreedevi P (13)

50.32%

44.07%

3.28%

2.3%

Present study

63.98%

18.25%

3.5%

14.3%


Table-6: Comparison of results in Lymph-node Lesion

Lesion

Valiya LG [13]

Kishore H. [11]

Sreedevi P [12]

Present Study

Reactive lymphadentitis

28.79%

35.08%

51.63%

28.53%

Non-specific inflammation

19.13%

12.80

9.15

3.4%

Granulomatous lesions

30.12

47.36

27.4

18.84%

Metastasis

19.80

3.50

5.88

36.38%

Lymphoma

2.16

0.87

5.88

7.59%

Inconclusive

-

-

-

5.23%


This difference is probably due to the fact that our hospital is a tertiary care centre with well-established oncology unit hence the high rates of referral of cancer patients. Most common primary formetastatic lesion was found to be oral cavity and upper respiratory tractsquamous cell carcinoma followed by duct carcinoma breast. The sensitivity of FNAC for metastatic lymph nodes varies from 97.9% to 100% with nearly 100 % specificity [14 ,15]. Indians account for highestintake of multiple types of tobacco products leading to high incidence of carcinoma oral cavity/pharynx, esophagus andlarynx[16]. Out of total 382 lymph node aspirated, there were 1.3 % aspirate which was inconclusive and most common reason was hemorrhagic aspirate.

Histopathological correlation was available in 182 cases and the cytological diagnosis was discordant in mere 3.2 % of cases. Two cases were cytologically diagnosed as granulomatous lymphadenitis and turned out to be malignant. One case was metastatic signet ring cell adenocarcinoma where the confusion was due to presence of granulomas along with signet ring cells resembling macrophages of sarcoidosis. And other case was Hodgkin’s lymphoma and is a known tumor to be associated with granulomas. Careful search for presence of Reed Sternberg cells should be done. On reviewing the smears of FNAC, the smears were hemorrhagic with few granulomas. On careful screening the smears also showed few eosinophils and occasional mononuclear cells and was considered as interpretation and screening error. Three discordant cases were due to sampling error and the smears on review also don’t show any representative cells. One case was diagnosed as reactive but in this case biopsy was advised to rule out low grade lymphoma because of the presence of monomorphic cell population. Thus, with proper technique and careful study, FNA of lymph nodes isa simple tool in the diagnosis of reactive, granulomatousas well as metastatic lesions and help detect occult primary malignancies inpatients.

In our study, female preponderance was observed in thyroid lesions withsimilar to 1:4 by Rathod GB [17]. Benign thyroid lesions including inflammatory were more common (70.64%) similar to Rathod GB [17]and Kishore HS [11].

Papillary Thyroid carcinoma (PTC) wasmost common thyroidmalignancy in our study similar to other authors [11,13,17]. Valiya LG [13]also concluded that surgical intervention for a purely diagnostic purpose can be avoided in majority of thyroid lesions with cytological assessment. FNA serves dual roleof diagnostic and therapeutic in cystic thyroid lesions.

In our study FNAC of salivary glands, Pleomorphic adenoma was most common lesionsimilar toBhagat VM. [18]. However,studies by Kishor SH [11], Valiya LG [13] and Rathod GB [17] had different observation with inflammatory and reactive lesions comprising themajority.

In our study oral lesion constitutes 13 cases diagnosed on FNAC. We got 11 (84.61%) cases of Squamous cell carcinoma, followed by mucocele 1(7.69%) and 1 case of round cell tumor (7.69%).Similar results were found in a study done by Gupta N et al[19] which states salivary gland tumor and Squamous cell carcinoma are the most common lesion in the oral cavity.

In present study epidermal inclusion cyst was the most common lesion (55.88%) on FNAC done on skin lesion. It is followed by inflammatory lesion (29.4%). Same results were also generated by a study done by Bhagat VM et al [18] and Sreedevi P. [12].

In our study soft tissue swellings, showed lipoma as a predominant lesion.It is followed by 1 case of each Lymphangioma (4.16%), spindle cell neoplasm(4.16%), chordoma(4.16%) and sarcoma (4.16%) almost similar tomiscellaneousl esions studied by Kishore SH [11] where epidermal cyst was 57.14% and lipoma was 23.8%.In our study we found 1 case of round cell tumor on FNAC from orbit. In present study, 3 cases of nasal cavity FNAC were done and two of them showed Squamous cell carcinoma and 1 case showed metastasis of Renal cell carcinoma.2 cases of Parathyroid FNAC was done, which showed primary hyperplasia and was associated with brown tumor of bone with lytic lesions.

Histopathological correlationwas evaluated in 47.2% of available cases for which a 94.7%concordance was observed.FNA of head and neck lesions has high histopathological concordance rateof over 90 %as observed by Nanik J [10] andKishor SH [11]as well. Fifteen cases haddiscordant diagnosis, careful interpretation, radiological guidedcytological assessment wherein lesions were deep and ill defined, necessaryand careful examination may have avoided the wrong diagnosis.

Inconclusive findings were observed in 3.35 % cases probably causes were non-cooperative patients especially pediatric population, small ill-defined small swellings, scanty aspirate, dry tap,haemorrhagic aspirates and non-representative sampling mostly in deep neck swelling.

Inflammatory/reactive and benign lesion comprised 58.29% cases in our studythus FNAC can help avoid unnecessary surgical biopsy and its attendant risks along with disadvantages such asscarring, greater duration of hospital stays and increased costs [20].

Conclusions


The present study conclude that Lymph node is the organ which is aspirated most and metastasis is the predominant lesion in our set-up. FNAC issimple, quick and cheap diagnostic tool to differentiate between neoplastic and non -neoplastic lesions andhelpsavoid unnecessary surgical intervention. We recommend FNA as first line investigation inswellings of head and neck for best diagnostic and therapeutic approach.


What this study adds to existing knowledge?This is a tertiary care centre study based in capital city of central Indian state. it adds to the demographic knowledge of head and neck lesions as well as increased prevalence of metastatic lesion in lymph nodes compared to similar studies in other parts of India. Oral and upper respiratory tract cancerspresent as lymph node swellings in head and neck region and timely diagnosis of such lesions on FNA, a simple procedure which can be carried out in peripheral regions and villages in health camps can decrease the morbidity and mortality significantly.

Contribution
    

 

Study conception and design

Acquisition of data

Analysis and interpretation of data

Drafting of manuscript

Critical revision:

Author 1

Yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Author 2

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Author 3

yes

yes

yes

yes

yes

Author 4

yes

 

 

yes

yes

Author 5

yes

 

 

yes

yes


Funding: Nil, Conflict of interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB: Yes

References

1. Abrari A, Ahmad SS, Bakshi V. Cytology in the otorhinolaryngologist’s domain - a study of 150 cases, emphasizing diagnostic utility and pitfalls. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2002;54(2):107-110. doi:10.1007/BF02968727.

2. Ahmad T, Naeem M, Ahmad S, Samad A, Nasir A. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and neck swellings in the surgical outpatient. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):30-2. [PubMed]

3. Gamba PG, Messino A, Antoniello LM, Boccato P, Blandamura S, Cecchetto G, et al. A simple exam to screen superficial masses, FNAC. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1995:24:97-9. [PubMed]

4. Lee JC, Siow JK. Thyroid surgery--the Tan Tock Seng Hospital otolaryngology experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002 Mar;31(2):158-64. [PubMed]

5. Afridi S, Malik K, WaheedI.Role of fine needle aspiration biopsy and cytology in breast lumps J Coll Physicians Surg. Pak. 1995;5:75-7. [PubMed]

6. Kevin G Burnand, Antony E Young, Jonathan Lucas et al. The New Aird’s companion in surgical studies 3rd ed, Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone.2005 P- 179 -81.

7. Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration of the head and neck. Pathology (Phila). 1996;4(2):409-38. [PubMed]

8. Bagga PK, Mahajan NC. Fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid swellings: how useful and accurate is it? Indian J Cancer. 2010 Oct-Dec;47(4):437-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.73564. [PubMed]

9. Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg. 1930 Aug;92(2):169-81. [PubMed]

10. Nanik J, Rathore H, Pachori G, Bansod P, Ratnawat K. Cytomorphology of head and neck lesions: A study in tertiary care hospital. Panacea J Med Science. 2015;5:145-9.

11. Kishore SH, Rajshri DP, Nandkumar DV,Yogesh T.Spectrum of FNAC in palpable head and neck lesions in a tertiary care hospital in india- a 3 years study; Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology, January – March 2015; 2(1); 7-13.

12. Sreedevi P, Kishore Ch, Pararkusa NC. Diagnostic Role of FNAC in evaluation of Head and Neck Lesions IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. Volume 15, Issue 9 September 2016,11-13.

13. Valiya LG, Padhariya BB, Baxi SN. Spectrum of FNAC in Palpable Head and Neck Lesions In a tertiary care hospital in Western India - A 2 years study. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016 June; 15(6):14-19.

14. Alam K, Khan A, Siddiqui F, Jain A, Haider N, Maheshwari V. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): A handy tool for metastatic lymphadenopathy. Int J Pathol. 2010;10:2.

15. Hirachand S, Lakhey M, Akhter J, Thapa B. Hirachand S1, Lakhey M, Akhter J, Thapa B. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph nodes in Kathmandu Medical College, Teaching hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2009 Apr-Jun;7(26):139-42. [PubMed]

16. Rastogi T, Devesa S, Mangtani P, Mathew A, Cooper N, Kao R, Sinha R. Cancer incidence rates among South Asians in four geographic regions: India, Singapore, UK and US. Int J Epidemiol. 2008 Feb;37(1):147-60. Epub 2007 Dec 19. [PubMed]

17. Rathod GB, Parmar P. Fine needle aspiration cytology of swellings of head and neck region. Indian J Med Sci. 2012 Mar-Apr;66(3-4):49-54. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.110896. [PubMed]

18. Bhagat VM, Tailor HJ, Saini PK et al. Fine needle aspiration cytology in non-thyroid head and neck masses-a descriptive study in teritary care hospital. National Journal of Medical Science Research 2013;3(3): 273-76.

19. Gupta N, Banik T, Rajwanshi A, Radotra BD, Panda N, Dey P, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R. Fine needle aspiration cytology of oral and oropharyngeal lesions with an emphasis on the diagnostic utility and pitfalls. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):626-9. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.106581.

20. Karayianis SL, Francisco GJ, Schumann GB. Clinical utility of head and neck aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 1988;4(3):187-92. [PubMed]



How to cite this article?

Meenai F.J, Jain R, Ojha S, Sawke G.K, Gupta S. Study of spectrum of head and neck lesions diagnosed on fine needle
aspiration cytology (FNAC). Trop J Path Micro 2018;4(1):93-100. doi: 10.17511/jopm.2018.i1.17.