Study of spectrum of head and
neck lesions diagnosed on fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC)
Meenai F. J.1,
Jain R.2, Ojha S3, Sawke G. K.4, Gupta S.5
1Dr. Farah Jalaly Meenai, Associate Professor, 2Dr. Rubal
Jain, Assistant Professor, 3Dr. Sandeep Ojha, Associate Professor, 4Dr.
Gopal Krishna Sawke, Professor and Head, 5Dr. Sonam Gupta,
Demonstrator, all authors are affiliated with Department of Pathology,
Chirayu Medical College & Hospital, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh,
India
Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Rubal Jain, A-152, Shahpura, 1st
Floor, Behind Shekhar Hospital, Bhopal (M.P). E-mail:
drrubaljain@gmail.com
Abstract
Background:
Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a cost effective and
minimally invasive diagnostic outdoor procedure for head and neck
lesions with high efficacy. Aims
and objectives: To evaluate the spectrum of head and neck
lesions with FNAC, its efficacy and correlating thefindings with
histopathological diagnosis wherever possible. Materials and Methods:
Retrospective observational study of 597 patients evaluated with FNAC
for head and neck lesions from 2014 January to December 2016. Data were
retrievedfrom the stored reports in Department Of Pathology and the
results were analyzed. Clinical and radiological details were obtained
from patients’ file wherever deemed necessary from Medical
Record Department of the institute. Results:
Most common site aspirated were Lymph nodes (64%) followed by Thyroid
(18.3%), skin (5.7%) andsoft tissue (4.02%). Most common diagnosis in
lymph node FNAC was metastatic lymphadenopathy (37.4%) followed by
reactive lymphadenitis (31.9%) and granulomatous lymphadenitis (20.4%).
Benign lesions were most common among thyroid swellings (70.1%)followed
by papillary carcinoma (12.9%). Majority of salivary gland lesions were
benign neoplasm (52.4%). Most common skin and soft tissuelesions were
epidermal inclusion cyst (52.9%) and lipoma (66.7%) respectively.
Histopathological diagnosis was available in 47.2% of cases with 94.7%
concordance. Conclusion:
Head and neck lesions are common superficial lesions that can be easily
diagnosed oncytology. It differentiates inflammatory/infectionfrom
neoplastic lesions and avoids unnecessary surgeries and expedites the
management. FNAC is cost effective and accurate diagnostic procedure
and can be recommended as a first line investigation.
Keywords:
Cytology. Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC), Head and Neck,
Swelling
Manuscript
received: 15th November 2017, Reviewed: 24th
November 2017
Author
Corrected: 30th November 2017, Accepted for Publication: 4th
December 2017
Introduction
Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is first
line investigation in approach towards diagnosis of superficial and
deep seated lesions of head and neck. FNAC is particularly relevant in
head and neck location because of easy accessibility, rapidity,
minimally invasive, accurate and cost effective procedure which is
accepted by majority of the patients. It may help in triage of
neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions and thus helps to avoid
unnecessary surgeries in non-neoplastic lesions thu sexp editing the
process of management of malignant lesions [1,2]. It causes minimal
trauma to the patient and carries virtually no risk andcomplications.
Swellings within the region of head and neck, especially salivary gland
and thyroid gland lesions can be readily diagnosed using this technique
[3, 4].
Spectrum of lesions of head and neck comprises of
developmental, inflammatory and neoplastic conditions. The most common
sites which are encountered for FNAC in head and neck region are lymph
nodes, thyroid, salivary gland, skin and soft tissue swellings. Lesions
like carotid body tumours, branchial cyst, thyroglossal cyst, cystic
hygroma, pharyngeal pouch and lump of skin appendages are less commonly
encountered [2].
FNAC is both diagnostic and therapeutic in cystic swellings
[5]. Fine needle aspiration cytology is helpful for the diagnosis of
salivary gland tumors where it can differentiate between a malignant
and a benign tumor with over 90% accuracy [6].
FNAC is particularly helpful in the work-up for cervical
masses and nodules because biopsy of cervical adenopathy should be
avoided unless all other diagnostic modalities have failed to establish
a diagnosis [7]. It could be considered as diagnostic procedure of
choice in cases of oral carcinoma presenting with neck node metastasis
because positive metastatic lymph node on FNAC may avoid biopsy of oral
lesions can be avoided if node is positive for metastasis.
In 1930, Martin introduced this technique for evaluation of
head and neck lesion and the procedure has since then being used for
all palpable swellings [8, 9].FNAC assessment needs relevant clinical
history of patient as well as radiological findings to make plausible
diagnosis.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wide spectrum
of lesions diagnosed on FNAC in patients with head and neck swellings
and to know the efficacy of FNAC in diagnosing head and neck lesions.
Material
and Methods
Place of study- Department
of Pathology, Chirayu Medical College and Hospital.Type of study-This
was a retrospective observational study. Sampling methods and collection
-Data were retrieved from the stored reports ofpatients in Department
Of Pathology and results were tabulated, analyzed and studied. Clinical
and radiological details were obtained from patients files. Inclusion
and exclusion criteria-All the cases of head and neck cases were
segregated from other lesions which were aspirated over a period of two
years (January 2015 to December 2016). Relevant clinical and
demographic details were noted and tabulated. This study also included
FNA performed under ultrasound guidance. Both air dried and alcohol
fixed smears stained with May Grundwald Giemsa (MGG) and Papanicalaou
(PAP) stain respectively and were studied. Results were also correlated
with special stains like Ziehl Nelson (ZN) stain wherever applicable.
The sites of FNAC were classified as lymph nodes, thyroid, skin, soft
tissue, salivary gland, oral cavity, nasal cavity, parathyroid, orbit
and miscellaneous where exact site or location cannot be ascertained.
Statistical methods-Data was tabulated,slides were reviewed wherever
necessary and the percentages were calculated for estimating frequency
of various pathological conditions. The cytological diagnosis was
correlated with histopathology wherever available and the concordance
rate, sensitivity, specificity value were calculated keeping
histopathology diagnosis as gold standard using the statistical program
Epi-info.
Result
In present study, out of 1800 patients enrolled for FNAC during study
period, 597 patients presented with head and neck swellings.
Patients’age ranged from 10 months to 84 years of age with
male to female ratio of 1.3:1.
Incidence of lymph node lesions was highest in
382 cases (64 %) followed by thyroid lesion in 109 cases (18.25%), skin
lesions in 34 cases (5.7%), soft tissue in 24 (4%) and salivary gland
in 21 cases (3.5%). Distribution of lesions with gender distribution
was as in Table 1.
Table-1: Distribution of
Lesions in Head and Neck FNAC and Gender distribution (Total n=597)
Organ involved
|
Total cases
|
Male
|
Female
|
Lymph node
|
382 (64 %)
|
239
|
143
|
Thyroid
|
109 (18.3 %)
|
27
|
82
|
Skin
|
34(5.7 %)
|
22
|
12
|
Soft Tissue
|
24 (4.02%)
|
16
|
08
|
Salivary gland
|
21(3.5 %)
|
16
|
05
|
Oral and nasal cavity
|
16(2.7%)
|
12
|
04
|
Parathyroid
|
02 (0.3%)
|
01
|
01
|
Orbit
|
01 (0.2%)
|
00
|
01
|
Miscellaneous lesion
|
08 (1.3%)
|
06
|
02
|
Total
|
597
|
339 (56.8%)
|
258 (43.2%)
|
The distribution of various sites aspirated and their
cytological diagnosis is illustrated in Table 2.
Table-2: Distribution of
lesion of head and neck with cytological diagnosis
Site
|
Total cases
|
Lesions
|
Cases
|
%
|
Lymph Nodes
|
382
|
Metastasis
|
141
|
36.9%
|
Reactive
Lymphadenitis
|
118
|
30.9%
|
Granulomatous
|
74
|
19.4%
|
Lymphoma
|
29
|
7.6%
|
Acute
inflammation
|
05
|
1.3%
|
Inconclusive
|
15
|
3.9%
|
Thyroid
|
109
|
Benign lesion
& Thyroiditis
|
75
|
68.8%
|
neoplasm
|
32
|
29.2%
|
Inconclusive
|
2
|
1.8%
|
Salivary Gland
|
21
|
Inflammatory
|
5
|
23.8%
|
Benign neoplasm
|
11
|
52.4%
|
Malignant
|
4
|
19%
|
Inconclusive
|
1
|
4.8%
|
Skin
|
34
|
Epidermal
inclusion cyst
|
18
|
52.9%
|
Inflammatory
lesion
|
10
|
29.4%
|
Granulation
|
5
|
14.7%
|
Inconclusive
|
1
|
2.9%
|
Soft Tissue
|
24
|
Lipoma
|
16
|
66.7%
|
Benign spindle
cell neoplasm
|
4
|
16.7%
|
Lymphangioma
|
1
|
4.2%
|
Chordoma
|
1
|
4.2%
|
Sarcoma
|
1
|
4.2%
|
Inconclusive
|
1
|
4.2%
|
Oral Cavity
|
13
|
Round cell tumor
|
1
|
7.7%
|
Mucococele
|
1
|
7.7%
|
Squamous cell
carcinoma
|
11
|
84.6%
|
Orbit
|
1
|
Round cell tumor
|
1
|
100%
|
Parathyroid
|
2
|
Parathyroid
Adenoma
|
2
|
100%
|
Nasal Cavity
|
3
|
Squamous cell
carcinoma
|
2
|
66.6%
|
Metastasis of
Renal Cell Carcinoma
|
1
|
33.3%
|
Miscellaneous lesion
|
8
|
Benign Cystic
lesion
|
3
|
37.5%
|
Brachial cleft
cyst
|
1
|
12.5%
|
Inflammatory
|
4
|
50%
|
Total
|
597
|
|
597
|
|
AmongLymph node swellings, the highest number of cases were
of non-neoplastic lesion (53.6%) of which majority were reactive
(31.9%), followed by granulomatous lymphadenitis (78%) and acute
lymphadenitis (1.3%). Malignant lesions were 45 % of which most common
were metastatic carcinomas from different sites mostly sqaumous in
originfollowed by hematolymphoid malignancies (7.6%). Out of 29 cases
of hematolymphoid malignancy, majority of the cases were Non Hodgkins
Lymphoma (20 cases, 69%), followed by Hodgkin’s lymphoma (7
cases, 24.1%), one case each ofmyeloid sarcoma and follicular dendritic
cell sarcoma. Fine needle aspiration was inconclusive in 1.3% of cases.
Amongst the thyroid swellings, FNAC revealed 68.8% of
Non-neoplastic lesions including colloid goiter and thyroiditis.
Whereas neoplastic lesions comprised of29.4% of which most common tumor
diagnosed was papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) comprising of total 22
cases, followed by 4 cases diagnosed as follicular neoplasm (3.7%), 3
cases each of medullary thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma of
thyroid (2.8%). Thyroid lesions had female preponderance with male:
female ratio of approximately 1:3.
A total of 21 cases of salivary gland lesions were
aspirated, which accountedfor 3.5% of total Head and Neck-
swellingswith male predominance. Most common lesions were benign
(47.6%) and comprised 6 cases of pleomorphic adenoma, 2 cases of
sialadenosis, and 2 benign lymphoepithelial lesions. Malignant
neoplasms were second most common and comprised of Adenoid cystic
carcinoma (3 cases) and one case each of mucoepidermoid carcinoma,
acinic cell carcinoma, and carcinoma- ex- pleomorphic adenoma. There
were 4 cases diagnosed as inflammatory lesions of which 3 cases showed
features of chronic sialadenitis and one case was of acute sialadenitis.
Thirty four cases of skin lesions located in head and neck
region were aspirated, of which the most common lesion was epidermal
inclusion cyst (52.9 %) followed by other inflammatory lesions (29.4%).
Five cases of malignancy were diagnosed of which three cases were of
scar recurrence inknown case of oral squamous carcinoma and one case
each of subcutaneous deposits of thyroid carcinoma and primary squamous
cell carcinoma of skin.
Soft tissue lesions were also aspirated of which lipoma was
most common (66.7%) and was followed by benign spindle cell neoplasm
(16.7%) and one case each of lymphangioma, chordoma, malignant spindle
cell sarcoma. Thirteen cases of intraoral lesions were also aspirated
composed of 8 cases of squamous carcinoma, 3 cases of pleomorphic
adenoma and one case each of mucocele and round cell tumor which was
later diagnosed as primitive neuroectodermal tumor. Other sites which
were also aspirated were orbit (1 case of rhabdomyosarcoma), two cases
of parathyroid adenoma, 3 cases of nasal cavity (two cases of squamous
carcinoma and one case was of metastasis of renal cell carcinoma).
There were 2 cases of thyroglossal cysts, 2 cases of Paraganglioma, one
case of branchial cleft cyst and 3 inflammatory lesions whose site of
origin cannot be ascertained.
Histopathological diagnosis was available in 47.2% of cases
of which cytology was concordant with histopathology in 94.7% of cases
and was discordant in 5.6%. Histopathological correlation with
cytological diagnosis was as inTable 3 while reason for discordant
cases was as in Table 4.
Table-3: Cyto-
histopathological correlation of Head and neck lesions
Organ involved
|
Total cases
|
Histopath diagnosis available
|
Concordant
|
Discordant
|
Lymph node
|
382
|
182
|
176
|
6
|
Thyroid
|
109
|
50
|
47
|
3
|
Skin
|
34
|
7
|
6
|
1
|
Soft Tissue
|
24
|
12
|
10
|
2
|
Salivary gland
|
21
|
10
|
9
|
1
|
Oral Cavity
|
13
|
11
|
11
|
0
|
Nasal Cavity
|
03
|
3
|
3
|
0
|
Parathyroid
|
02
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
Orbit
|
01
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Miscellaneous lesion
|
08
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
Total
|
597
|
282 (47.2%)
|
267 (94.7%)
|
15 (5.3%)
|
Table-4: Distribution of
cyto –histopatholgical discordant cases and reasons
|
Site of FNAC
|
Cytological Diagnosis
|
Histological Diagnosis
|
Type of error
|
Case 1
|
Lymph Node
|
Acute
Lymphadenitis
|
Cystic metastasis
of squamous cell carcinoma
|
Sampling
|
Case 2
|
Lymph Node
|
Granulomatous
|
Metastatic signet
ring adenocarcinoma
|
Interpretation
|
Case 3
|
Lymph Node
|
Granulomatous
|
Hodgkin’s
lymphoma
|
Interpretation
|
Case 4
|
Lymph Node
|
Reactive
|
Low grade Non
Hodgkins Lymphoma
|
NA as biopsy was
advised to rule out NHL
|
Case 5
|
Lymph Node
|
Reactive
|
Kikuchi like
necrotizing lymphadenitis
|
Sampling
|
Case 6
|
Lymph Node
|
Reactive
|
Granulomatous
|
Sampling
|
Case 7
|
Thyroid
|
PTC
|
Hyperplastic
Goitre
|
Interpretation
|
Case 8
|
Thyroid
|
PTC
|
Goitre with
degeneration
|
Interpretation
|
Case 9
|
Thyroid
|
Hyperplastic
Goitre
|
PTC
|
Sampling
|
Case 10
|
Parathyroid
|
Follicular
Neoplasm of Thyroid
|
Parathyroid
Adenoma
|
Improper clinical
details
|
Case 11
|
Skin
|
Inflammatory
lesion
|
Scar recurrence
of SCC
|
Sampling
|
Case 12
|
Soft Tissue
|
Benign spindle
cell lesion
|
Angiosarcoma
|
Interpretation
|
Case 13
|
Soft Tissue
|
Malignant spindle
cell sarcoma
|
Ancient Schwannoma
|
Interpretation
|
Case 14
|
Salivary Gland
|
Adenoid cystic
carcinoma
|
Pleomorphic
adenoma
|
Interpretation
|
Case 15
|
Miscellaneous
|
PTC
|
Paraganglioma
|
Interpretation
|
Discussion
FNAC is arapid diagnostic test in the initial assessment of the head
and neck lesions which are superficial and easy to access .It has
inherent advantage of being an outpatientprocedure,does not require
sedation or anaesthesia ,minimally painful and takes only few minutes
to perform compared to time consuming, complicated and invasivebiopsy
procedure [10].
Comparative evaluation of various head and neck lesions was
done with other similar studies as in Table 5.
In this study, most common organ aspirated was lymph-node
(64%)andmost common diagnosis was metastatic lymphadenopathy which is
in discordance with other authors [10-12] who reported reactive
lymphadenitis and Valiya LG [13]who reportedgranulomatous
lymphadenopathyas most common lesion. The distribution of lymph node
cytological assessment in various studies was as in Table 6.
Table-5: Comparison of
results of FNAC of head and neck studies
Study
|
Lymphnode
|
Thyroid
|
Salivary Gland
|
Soft Tissue
|
Nanik J (10)
|
64.3%
|
17.5%
|
4.8%
|
13.5%
|
Kishor H.et.al.(11)
|
39.58%
|
31.25%
|
18.75%
|
7.29%
|
Sreedevi P (13)
|
50.32%
|
44.07%
|
3.28%
|
2.3%
|
Present study
|
63.98%
|
18.25%
|
3.5%
|
14.3%
|
Table-6: Comparison of
results in Lymph-node Lesion
Lesion
|
Valiya LG [13]
|
Kishore H. [11]
|
Sreedevi P [12]
|
Present Study
|
Reactive lymphadentitis
|
28.79%
|
35.08%
|
51.63%
|
28.53%
|
Non-specific inflammation
|
19.13%
|
12.80
|
9.15
|
3.4%
|
Granulomatous lesions
|
30.12
|
47.36
|
27.4
|
18.84%
|
Metastasis
|
19.80
|
3.50
|
5.88
|
36.38%
|
Lymphoma
|
2.16
|
0.87
|
5.88
|
7.59%
|
Inconclusive
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5.23%
|
This difference is probably due to the fact that our
hospital is a tertiary care centre with well-established oncology unit
hence the high rates of referral of cancer patients. Most common
primary formetastatic lesion was found to be oral cavity and upper
respiratory tractsquamous cell carcinoma followed by duct carcinoma
breast. The sensitivity of FNAC for metastatic lymph nodes varies from
97.9% to 100% with nearly 100 % specificity [14 ,15]. Indians account
for highestintake of multiple types of tobacco products leading to high
incidence of carcinoma oral cavity/pharynx, esophagus andlarynx[16].
Out of total 382 lymph node aspirated, there were 1.3 % aspirate which
was inconclusive and most common reason was hemorrhagic aspirate.
Histopathological correlation was available in 182 cases and
the cytological diagnosis was discordant in mere 3.2 % of cases. Two
cases were cytologically diagnosed as granulomatous lymphadenitis and
turned out to be malignant. One case was metastatic signet ring cell
adenocarcinoma where the confusion was due to presence of granulomas
along with signet ring cells resembling macrophages of sarcoidosis. And
other case was Hodgkin’s lymphoma and is a known tumor to be
associated with granulomas. Careful search for presence of Reed
Sternberg cells should be done. On reviewing the smears of FNAC, the
smears were hemorrhagic with few granulomas. On careful screening the
smears also showed few eosinophils and occasional mononuclear cells and
was considered as interpretation and screening error. Three discordant
cases were due to sampling error and the smears on review also
don’t show any representative cells. One case was diagnosed
as reactive but in this case biopsy was advised to rule out low grade
lymphoma because of the presence of monomorphic cell population. Thus,
with proper technique and careful study, FNA of lymph nodes isa simple
tool in the diagnosis of reactive, granulomatousas well as metastatic
lesions and help detect occult primary malignancies inpatients.
In our study, female preponderance was observed in thyroid
lesions withsimilar to 1:4 by Rathod GB [17]. Benign thyroid lesions
including inflammatory were more common (70.64%) similar to Rathod GB
[17]and Kishore HS [11].
Papillary Thyroid carcinoma (PTC) wasmost common
thyroidmalignancy in our study similar to other authors [11,13,17].
Valiya LG [13]also concluded that surgical intervention for a purely
diagnostic purpose can be avoided in majority of thyroid lesions with
cytological assessment. FNA serves dual roleof diagnostic
and therapeutic in cystic thyroid lesions.
In our study FNAC of salivary glands, Pleomorphic adenoma
was most common lesionsimilar toBhagat VM. [18]. However,studies by
Kishor SH [11], Valiya LG [13] and Rathod GB [17] had different
observation with inflammatory and reactive lesions comprising
themajority.
In our study oral lesion constitutes 13 cases diagnosed on
FNAC. We got 11 (84.61%) cases of Squamous cell carcinoma, followed by
mucocele 1(7.69%) and 1 case of round cell tumor (7.69%).Similar
results were found in a study done by Gupta N et al[19] which states
salivary gland tumor and Squamous cell carcinoma are the most common
lesion in the oral cavity.
In present study epidermal inclusion cyst was the most
common lesion (55.88%) on FNAC done on skin lesion. It is followed by
inflammatory lesion (29.4%). Same results were also generated by a
study done by Bhagat VM et al [18] and Sreedevi P. [12].
In our study soft tissue swellings, showed lipoma as a
predominant lesion.It is followed by 1 case of each Lymphangioma
(4.16%), spindle cell neoplasm(4.16%), chordoma(4.16%) and sarcoma
(4.16%) almost similar tomiscellaneousl esions studied by Kishore SH
[11] where epidermal cyst was 57.14% and lipoma was 23.8%.In our study
we found 1 case of round cell tumor on FNAC from orbit. In present
study, 3 cases of nasal cavity FNAC were done and two of them showed
Squamous cell carcinoma and 1 case showed metastasis of Renal cell
carcinoma.2 cases of Parathyroid FNAC was done, which showed primary
hyperplasia and was associated with brown tumor of bone with lytic
lesions.
Histopathological correlationwas evaluated in 47.2% of
available cases for which a 94.7%concordance was observed.FNA of head
and neck lesions has high histopathological concordance rateof over 90
%as observed by Nanik J [10] andKishor SH [11]as well. Fifteen cases
haddiscordant diagnosis, careful interpretation, radiological
guidedcytological assessment wherein lesions were deep and ill defined,
necessaryand careful examination may have avoided the wrong diagnosis.
Inconclusive findings were observed in 3.35 % cases probably
causes were non-cooperative patients especially pediatric population,
small ill-defined small swellings, scanty aspirate, dry
tap,haemorrhagic aspirates and non-representative sampling mostly in
deep neck swelling.
Inflammatory/reactive and benign lesion comprised 58.29%
cases in our studythus FNAC can help avoid unnecessary surgical biopsy
and its attendant risks along with disadvantages such asscarring,
greater duration of hospital stays and increased costs [20].
Conclusions
The present study conclude that Lymph node is the organ which is
aspirated most and metastasis is the predominant lesion in our set-up.
FNAC issimple, quick and cheap diagnostic tool to differentiate between
neoplastic and non -neoplastic lesions andhelpsavoid unnecessary
surgical intervention. We recommend FNA as first line investigation
inswellings of head and neck for best diagnostic and therapeutic
approach.
What this study adds to existing knowledge?This is a
tertiary care centre study based in capital city of central Indian
state. it adds to the demographic knowledge of head and neck lesions as
well as increased prevalence of metastatic lesion in lymph nodes
compared to similar studies in other parts of India. Oral and upper
respiratory tract cancerspresent as lymph node swellings in head and
neck region and timely diagnosis of such lesions on FNA, a simple
procedure which can be carried out in peripheral regions and villages
in health camps can decrease the morbidity and mortality significantly.
Contribution
|
Study conception and design
|
Acquisition of data
|
Analysis and interpretation of data
|
Drafting of manuscript
|
Critical revision:
|
Author 1
|
Yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
Author 2
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
Author 3
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
Author 4
|
yes
|
|
|
yes
|
yes
|
Author 5
|
yes
|
|
|
yes
|
yes
|
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Abrari A, Ahmad SS, Bakshi V.
Cytology in the otorhinolaryngologist’s domain - a study of
150 cases, emphasizing diagnostic utility and pitfalls. Indian Journal
of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2002;54(2):107-110.
doi:10.1007/BF02968727.
2. Ahmad T, Naeem M, Ahmad S, Samad A, Nasir A. Fine needle
aspiration cytology (FNAC) and neck swellings in the surgical
outpatient. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Jul-Sep;20(3):30-2. [PubMed]
3. Gamba PG, Messino A, Antoniello LM, Boccato P, Blandamura
S, Cecchetto G, et al. A simple exam to screen superficial masses,
FNAC. Med Pediatr Oncol, 1995:24:97-9. [PubMed]
4. Lee JC, Siow JK. Thyroid surgery--the Tan Tock Seng
Hospital otolaryngology experience. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2002
Mar;31(2):158-64. [PubMed]
5. Afridi S, Malik K, WaheedI.Role of fine needle aspiration
biopsy and cytology in breast lumps J Coll Physicians Surg. Pak.
1995;5:75-7. [PubMed]
6. Kevin G Burnand, Antony E Young, Jonathan Lucas et al.
The New Aird’s companion in surgical studies 3rd ed,
Elsevier, Churchill Livingstone.2005 P- 179 -81.
7. Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration of the head and neck.
Pathology (Phila). 1996;4(2):409-38. [PubMed]
8. Bagga PK, Mahajan NC. Fine needle aspiration cytology of
thyroid swellings: how useful and accurate is it? Indian J Cancer. 2010
Oct-Dec;47(4):437-42. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.73564. [PubMed]
9. Martin HE, Ellis EB. Biopsy by needle puncture and
aspiration. Ann Surg. 1930 Aug;92(2):169-81. [PubMed]
10. Nanik J, Rathore H, Pachori G, Bansod P, Ratnawat K.
Cytomorphology of head and neck lesions: A study in tertiary care
hospital. Panacea J Med Science. 2015;5:145-9.
11. Kishore SH, Rajshri DP, Nandkumar DV,Yogesh T.Spectrum
of FNAC in palpable head and neck lesions in a tertiary care hospital
in india- a 3 years study; Indian Journal of Pathology and Oncology,
January – March 2015; 2(1); 7-13.
12. Sreedevi P, Kishore Ch, Pararkusa NC. Diagnostic Role of
FNAC in evaluation of Head and Neck Lesions IOSR Journal of Dental and
Medical Sciences. Volume 15, Issue 9 September 2016,11-13.
13. Valiya LG, Padhariya BB, Baxi SN. Spectrum of FNAC in
Palpable Head and Neck Lesions In a tertiary care hospital in Western
India - A 2 years study. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016
June; 15(6):14-19.
14. Alam K, Khan A, Siddiqui F, Jain A, Haider N, Maheshwari
V. Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): A handy tool for metastatic
lymphadenopathy. Int J Pathol. 2010;10:2.
15. Hirachand S, Lakhey M, Akhter J, Thapa B. Hirachand S1,
Lakhey M, Akhter J, Thapa B. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration
cytology of lymph nodes in Kathmandu Medical College, Teaching
hospital. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2009 Apr-Jun;7(26):139-42. [PubMed]
16. Rastogi T, Devesa S, Mangtani P, Mathew A, Cooper N, Kao
R, Sinha R. Cancer incidence rates among South Asians in four
geographic regions: India, Singapore, UK and US. Int J Epidemiol. 2008
Feb;37(1):147-60. Epub 2007 Dec 19. [PubMed]
17. Rathod GB, Parmar P. Fine needle aspiration cytology of
swellings of head and neck region. Indian J Med Sci. 2012
Mar-Apr;66(3-4):49-54. doi: 10.4103/0019-5359.110896. [PubMed]
18. Bhagat VM, Tailor HJ, Saini PK et al. Fine needle
aspiration cytology in non-thyroid head and neck masses-a descriptive
study in teritary care hospital. National Journal of Medical Science
Research 2013;3(3): 273-76.
19. Gupta N, Banik T, Rajwanshi A, Radotra BD, Panda N, Dey
P, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R. Fine needle aspiration cytology of oral
and oropharyngeal lesions with an emphasis on the diagnostic utility
and pitfalls. J Cancer Res Ther. 2012 Oct-Dec;8(4):626-9. doi:
10.4103/0973-1482.106581.
20. Karayianis SL, Francisco GJ, Schumann GB. Clinical
utility of head and neck aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol.
1988;4(3):187-92. [PubMed]
How to cite this article?
Meenai F.J, Jain R, Ojha S, Sawke G.K, Gupta S. Study of spectrum of
head and neck lesions diagnosed on fine needle
aspiration cytology (FNAC). Trop J Path Micro 2018;4(1):93-100. doi:
10.17511/jopm.2018.i1.17.