Adenocarcionma Of Mullerian
Origin masquerading as an ovarian tumour- a rare case report.
Sarangi S1, Sarkar U2,
Chakrabarti S3
1Dr. Sujata Sarangi, 2Dr. Urvee Sarkar, 3Dr. Suchismita Chakrabarti,
All the authors are affiliated with Department Of Pathology, R G Kar
Medical College, Kolkata, Address- Department Of Pathology,
RG Kar Medical College, 1, Khudiram Bose
Road, Kolkata-700004, India
Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Urvee Sarkar, Department of Pathology,
R G Kar Medical College, Kolkata. Address- Department of Pathology, RG
Kar Medical College, 1, Khudiram Bose Road, Kolkata, India. Email-
drurvee.sarkar@gmail.com
Abstract
Objective:
To create awareness about this rare tumour and the way it can mislead
the clinician into believing it to be of an ovarian origin. Case
report: A 50 years old postmenopausal female presented with a partly
solid-partly cystic mass noted arising from the mesentery of sigmoid
colon, obliterating the pouch of douglas and adhered to the posterior
surface of uterus and right adnexa. The histopa thological features were
suggestive of Adenocarcinoma of Mullerian origin. Conclusion: Great
caution and precision are needed to ascertain the origin and management
of these tumours as they carry a bad prognosis.
Keywords:
Adenocarcinoma, Mullerian, Peritoneal
Manuscript received: 10th
August 2017, Reviewed:
20th August 2017
Author Corrected: 28th
August 2017, Accepted for
Publication: 4th September 2017
Introduction
Adenocarcinoma of Mullerian origin, previously, known as
‘mesothelioma of pelvic origin’, is a rare primary
malignancy of the peritoneum [1]. It is frequently found identical to
papillary serous adenocarcinoma of the ovary, hence, also referred to
as extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma. We present a
case of a 50 year old postmenopausal lady presenting with a
heterogenous abdominal SOL arising from the mesentery. The mass was
diagnosed as Adenocarcinoma of Mullerian origin. It is of value to
emphasize that the presentation of the case may be misleading as was in
our case where the patient complained of bleeding per vaginum
compelling the clinician to suspect carcinoma of the reproductive tract.
Case
report
A 50 years old postmenopausal female came to the Gynaecology and
Obstetrics outdoor department with the complaints of bleeding per
vaginum. No gross abnormality was noted on physical examination.
CT scan of the abdomen revealed a moderate to large heterogenous solid
enhancing mass with irregular necrosis in the right adnexal region
pushing the uterus anteriorly, with minimal encysted fluid. Left ovary
was found to be bulky and heterogenous in density. No calcification was
seen on either side.
On exploratory laparotomy, a partly solid-partly cystic mass was noted
arising from the mesentery of sigmoid colon, obliterating the Pouch of
Douglas. The mass was adhered to the posterior surface of uterus and
right adnexa. The uterus along with the adnexa were grossly normal.
Pan-hysterectomy was done along with adhesiolysis and resection of the
mass.
On gross examination, we found that uterus and cervix measured 6x4x3
cm. Both adnexa were found to be within normal limits. Along with the
specimen of TAH-BSO, we found a mass measuring 6 x 4 x 2 cm. Cut
section showed whitish solid areas with regions of cystic degeneration.
Papillary projections were noted on the surface.
Histopathological examination showed a tumour composed of poorly
differentiated epithelial cells arranged in sheets and papillary
configurations Fig (1).
Fig 1:
Micrograph showing section from the tumour tissue composed of poorly
differentiated epithelial cells arranged in sheets (High power view)
The neoplastic cells were highly anaplastic and bizarre cells with foci
of elongated plump spindle cells Fig (2).
Fig 2:
Micrograph of section from the tumour tissue showing highly anaplastic
and bizarre cells with foci of elongated plump spindle cells (high
power view)
The nuclei were hyperchromatic and irregular and there were many areas
of haemorrhage and necrosis. The features were suggestive of
Adenocarcarcinoma of Mullerian origin.
Discussion
Adenocarcarcinoma of Mullerian origin is a rare fatal entity.
Previously this tumour was called Mesothelioma of Pelvic peritoneum
resembling papillary serous adenocarcinoma of ovary [1].
This rare malignant tumour is usually seen in 56-62 years of
postmenopausal females. This tumour presents as peritoneal
carcinomatosis with no evidence of primary site of origin. The usual
presenting features are abdominal pain and ascites. In our case, the
patient was a postmenopausal female presenting with bleeding per
vaginum [2].
There are various controversies regarding the origin of these tumours;
some studies claim them to be of mesothelial origin whereas others have
also suggested them to be associated with BRCA1 or p53 mutation and
also with pathology of fimbrial end of fallopian tube.[2, 3]. In our
case the presentation was a bit unusual as the CT scan revealed that
the mass arose from the right adnexa, which was disproved only on
laparatomy, which showed that both adnexa were normal and the mass was
actually located on the posterior aspect of uterus, arising from the
mesentery of sigmoid colon.
Adenocarcarcinoma of Mullerian origin can be diagnosed by excluding any
primary tumour of ovary and if present, then, the tumour should be
confined within the ovarian capsule without any cortical invasion. This
diagnosis is preferred when histology of this tumour resembles that of
ovarian serous tumour Various immunohistochemistry panels have been
experimented in cases to distinguish this tumour form primary ovarian
serous neoplasm. Immunostaining for CK7, WT1, PAX8 and negativity for
CK20 is highly indicative of the disease but this panel has not proven
to be uniform and of much diagnostic help [3, 4, 5, 6].
According to Patil et al, to prove the tumour to be Adenocarcinoma of
Mullerian origin, radiological evidence should also point towards
grossly normal uterus and adnexa. Our case was not in concordance with
this fact as the innocence of the adnexa was proved on laparotomy and
not on radiological study [7].
According to the available research, the prognosis of our tumour is
worse than even stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma hence a prompt diagnosis
and subsequent treatment is imperative.
Cytoreductive surgery is not the mainstay of treatment.
Chemotherapeutic agents like Cisplatin have proved useful [8].
Conclusion
As these tumours have a worse prognosis than the ovarian carcinomas,
they should be treated with great caution and their diagnosis should be
accurate as far as possible, so as not to confound the judgement of the
medical and radiation oncologist in subsequent management of the case.
Funding:
Nil, Conflict of
interest: None initiated.
Permission from IRB:
Yes
References
1. Swerdlow M. Mesothelioma of the pelvic peritoneum resembling
papillary cystadenocarcinoma of the ovary; case report. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1959;77(1):197–200 doi:
10.4103/0973-1075.132653.
2. Piek JM, van Diest PJ, Zweemer RP, Jansen JW, Poort-Keesom RJ, Menko
FH, et al. Dysplastic changes in prophylactically removed Fallopian
tubes of women predisposed to developing ovarian cancer. J
Pathol.2001;195(4):451–6. doi:10.1002/path.1000. [PubMed]
3. Schorge JO, Muto MG, Lee SJ, Huang LW, Welch WR, Bell DA, Keung EZ,
Berkowitz RS, Mok SC. BRCA1-related papillary serous carcinoma of the
peritoneum has a unique molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res.
2000;60:1361–1364. [PubMed]
4. Hou T, Liang D, He J, et al. Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: a
clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of six cases. Int J
Clin Exp Pathol. 2012;5(8):762–9 doi:
10.4103/0973-1075.132653.
5. Phillips V, Kelly P, McCluggage WG. Increased p16 expression in
high-grade serous and undifferentiated carcinoma compared with other
morphologic types of ovarian carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2009
Mar;28(2):179-86. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e318182c2d2.
6. Cameron RI, Ashe P, O'Rourke DM, Foster H,
McCluggage WG. A panel of immunohistochemical stains assists in the
distinction between ovarian and renal clear cell carcinoma. Int J
Gynecol Pathol. 2003 Jul;22(3):272-6. [PubMed]
7. Patil RP, Bharambe BM, Mahure AH, Kurdukar
MD, Patil AA, Deshpande KA . A case report of primary psammomatous
serous adenocarcinoma of the Peritoneum. S Afr J Obstet Gynaecol 2016;
8(1):1–3. doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2015.1116186.
8. Fowler JM, Nieberg RK, Schooler TA,
Berek JS. Peritoneal adenocarcinoma (serous) of Müllerian
type: a subgroup of women presenting with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1994 Jan;4(1):43-51.
How to cite this article?
Sarangi S, Sarkar U, Chakrabarti S. Adenocarcionma Of
Mullerian Origin masquerading as an ovarian tumour- a rare case report.
Trop J Path Micro 2017;3(3):313-316.doi: 10.17511/jopm.2017.i3.15.